Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
immadisetty Nagaratnamma (Died) Per Lrs Vs. Gostu Prameelamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-11-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2327 o11. 10-2012 Immadisetty Nagaratnamma (died) per LRs Immadisetty Mallikarjuna Rao and 5 others. Gostu Prameelamma ^Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P.Gangarami Reddy !Counsel for the respondent: Sri M.Chalapathi Rao : ?Cases referred: NIL Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 30-03-2012, in RCA.No.6 of 2010, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, whereby she has confirmed Order, dated 20-07-2010, in RCC.No.28 of 1990, on the file of the Court of the learned Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nellore. The respondent, who is the landlady, filed RCC.No.28 of 1990 against the husband of late Immadisetty Nagaratnamma, who was the original tenant, in the Court of the learned Rent Controller-cum- Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nellore, for his eviction under Sections 10 (2) (i), 10 (2) (v) and 10 (3) (iii) of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (L...
K. Anji Reddy Vs. Asha Jyothi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-11-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.680 o11. 10.2012 K. Anji Reddy Asha Jyothi and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D. Prakash Reddy Counsel for Respondents: Smt. Manjari S. Ganu : ?Citations: ORDER: The petitioner and respondent No.5 purchased an extent of Acs.3.09 guntas of land in Survey Nos.526 and 529 of Rampally Dayara Village, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from Smt. B.Uma Devi, through sale deed, dated 29.09.2007. Alleging that the respondents herein are interfering with their possession over the suit schedule property, the petitioner and respondent No.5 filed O.S.No.342 of 2008 in the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy at L.B.Nagar for the relief of perpetual injunction. They have also filed I.A.No.782 of 2008 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 filed a counter alleging that Uma Devi executed agreement of sale in favour of Sri Madhusudhan Reddy and Sri S.Yadagiri Goud in the year 2001 and...
V. Venkata Subba Reddy Vs. the Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Ms Genera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-11-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) The appellant is an unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brief is that he is a Class II contractor. He purchased Tata Hitachi Model EX200-LC Hydraulic Excavator by availing loan from R.2 Bank and the same was covered by a policy issued by R.1 for a sum of Rs.1,46,900/- covering the period from 25.07.2009 to 24.07.2010. While so, on 25.03.2010 the said vehicle met with an accident. On report, the Insurance Company appointed a surveyor, T.Sreenivasan, who assessed the loss. After informing the same to the Insurance Company, the vehicle was shifted to Sri M.S.V.Ganesh Engineering Works, Ananthapur for repairs. It had estimated Rs.1,46,900/- towards repairs. He had submitted documents pertaining to the vehicle along with the original bills and claim form, but the Insurance Company did not settle the claim. Therefore, he claimed Rs.1,46,900/- together with interest at 24% per annum, besides compensation of Rs.5,000/...
Duggireddy Naga Lakshumma Vs. the Dealer, Castrol India Ltd. and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-11-2012
Oral Order (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) 1.The appellant is an unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brief is that her husband, Duggireddy Venkata Reddy was the owner of the Tractor bearing No.AP-04-U-4648 with trolley No.4647 and by virtue of the Scheme floated by O.P.No.1, a personal accident policy was issued for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- covering the period from 31.03.2009 to 30.03.2010. While so, on 10.09.2009 while he was carrying a cement pole it slipped and fell down into the canal and as a result of which he sustained head injury as it fell on his head and consequently fell unconsciousness. Immediately, he was taken to RIMS Hospital, Kadapa for treatment, and on the very same day he was taken to SVIMS, Tirupathi for better treatment and was discharged on 24.09.2009 and after he was brought to his house he died on 04.10.2009. When she submitted the claim along with death certificate, etc. followed by a legal notice, there was no reply from the I...
Smt. M. Venkatamma Vs. the Senior Divisional Manager, Lic of India and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-11-2012
Oral Order: ( Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant against the order of dismissal of her complaint at the stage of admission itself. The case of the complainant in brief is that she is the wife of Madala Krishnaiah, who had taken a Jeevan Mitra (Triple Cover Endowment) Policy with Accident Benefit for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- covering the period from 28.03.2002 to 28.03.2022 keeping his brother Madala Chandraiah as nominee. The assured died on 24.03.2003. On that, the nominee, the brother of the deceased, filed a complaint CC.No.103/2005 claiming the amount. However, the same dismissed. The District Forum opined that the claimant was Class-II legal heir and therefore, he was not entitled to claim the amount. Later, she being the legally wedded wife and Class-I legal heir of the deceased claimed the amount after issuing a notice. The Insurance Company repudiated the same. Therefore, she filed the complaint claiming the amoun...
Cherukumali Sankara Rao and Another Vs. Koteru Veeramma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-10-2012
Order, dated 25-09-2012, in Memo in G.L.No.2235/2012 in E.P.No.3 of 2011 in OS.No.1/2009, on the file of the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nandigama, is the subject matter of this Writ Petition. By the aforesaid Order, the learned Senior Civil Judge opined that the memo filed by the petitioners for transfer of OS.No.1 of 2009 to any other Court is an act of contempt. The learned Senior Civil Judge, while dismissing the said memo with costs of Rs.7,000/-, directed arrest of the petitioner No.1 in the event of his failure to pay costs besides issuing contempt notice to the petitioners. In the Writ Petition, the petitioners averred that the learned Senior Civil Judge has no power to initiate contempt proceedings. Upon considering the facts noted by the learned Senior Civil Judge in the impugned order, this Court prima facie felt that petitioner No.1 was not fair in conducting himself as defendant in the suit as he did not co-operate in disposal of the Execution Proceedings. Thi...
The Chairman and Managing Director Southern Power Distribution Company ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-10-2012
PinakiChandra Ghose, ACJ. This writ appeal is directed against the order dt.28.9.2010 passed by the Hon'ble Sinlge Judge, in W.P. No.8231 of 2005. Respondent - writ petitioner filed the writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in not adjusting the import energy during the months of August 202 and November 2003 against the banked energy of the writ petitioner and raising the bills for the said two months against the petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction. The facts of the case briefly are as follows. Respondent - writ petitioner, which is an integrated sugar factory with co-generation of power, was sanctioned 8 Mega Watts (MW) bagasee cogeneration plant at its sugar factory by NEDCAP vide sanction letter dt.7.4.1997. The petitioner was permitted for captive consumption of 3 MW during the season and 1.2 MW during off-season. The sugar mill with 3 MW power generation went operational on 22.11.1997. Subsequent thereto, 5 MW power generator was added and &n...
P.Satyanarayana Vs. State, Rep. by Its Inspector of Police,s
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-10-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1083 OF 200.10.10.2012 P.Satyanarayana State, rep. by its Inspector of Police,SPE/CBI, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Special PP for CBI : Cases referred:1. AIR 200.Supreme Court 2022 (1) JUDGMENT:1. This Criminal Appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 06.07.2005 in Calendar Case No.14 of 2002 on the file of the Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases, Visakhapatnam, whereunder and whereby the appellant/sole accused was convicted of the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1) (d) (ii) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act'), and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.200/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month for the offence under Section 7 of the Act, and to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.300/- in default ...
The Chairman and Managing Director South Vs. M/S. Sudalagunta Sugars L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-10-2012
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1390 OF 201.10-10-2012 The Chairman and Managing Director Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Tirupati, and others M/s. Sudalagunta Sugars Limited Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Mr. S. Jayaram Chowdary COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS: Sri O. Manohar Reddy,Standing Counsel for A.P. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: Sri M.P. Chandramouli GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: (2012) 4 SCC 78.JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose) This writ appeal is directed against the order dt.28.9.2010 passed by the Hon'ble Sinlge Judge, in W.P. No.8231 of 2005. Respondent - writ petitioner filed the writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in not adjusting the import energy during the months of August 202 and November 2003 against the banked energy of the writ petitioner and raising t...
Bomiidala Sri Raja Vara Prasad Vs. the Superintending Engineer Operati ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-10-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the dismissal of the complaint. The District Forum dismissed the complaint on the premise that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint. The complaint was dismissed holding that the special tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Indian Electricity (AP Amendment) Act,2000 and the Electricity Act,2003 to decide the disputes relating to assessment. 2. The appellant purchased a house at Guntur from its owner on 17.10.2005 and got transferred the electricity service connection number 19880 on 14.03.2007 and prior to the mutation of his name in the records of the respondents, he leased out the house to M/s Godfrey Philip India Ltd for running its office and on 21.11.2005, the Additional Assistant Engineer (Operation) inspected the service connection and found that the domestic category service was utilized for commercial purpose and the sec...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »