Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Giridhar Kumar Vs. Miss Sellammal (Died Per Lrs)
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
This revision presents an important question of law, pertaining to the admissibility of a promissory note, in the context of adequacy of stamp duty. The petitioner filed O.S.No.145 of 2005 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati, against the respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs.9,49,175/-, on the strength of a promissory note dated 12-05-2002. The trial of the suit commenced, and the cross-examination of PW-1, i.e., the petitioner herein is in progress. When he sought to mark the promissory note, as an exhibit, objection was raised by the respondent, as to its admissibility. The promissory note was written on an impressed stamp paper of Rs.20/-, purchased in the State of Tamil Nadu. By executing that document, the respondent is said to have borrowed a sum of Rs.7 lakhs on 12-05-2002. Placing reliance upon Rule 3(iii) of the Indian Stamp Rules, 1925, as they apply to the State of Andhra Pradesh, (for short ‘the Rules’), it was urged that the instrument canno...
J.S. Ranga Nayakulu and Others Vs. the District Collector, Visakhapatn ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21400 o31. 10-2012 J.S. Ranga Nayakulu & others The District Collector, Visakhapatnam & others Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.V. Bhanu Prasad ^Counsel for respondenst: G.P. for Revenue for RRs 1 to 3 Sri SSV Prasada Rao, for R-4 : Citations: ORDER: The petitioners claim rights over the land in Sy.Nos.3, 11, 13 and 14/P of Purushottapuram Agraharam, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Their grievance is that even while an enquiry under Section 7(1) of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 (for short ' the Inams Act') is pending, the respondents 1 to 3 are trying to disturb their possession and are taking steps to bring about a Ship Building Unit of the Indian Navy. The petitioners submit that they are in possession and enjoyment of the land, referred to above, and the application filed by them for grant of ryotwari patta is pending. The District Collector, the 1st respo...
J.Rangaraj Vs. the A.P. State Handloom Weavers Coop. So
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.17894 o31. 10-2012 J.Rangaraj The A.P. State Handloom Weavers Coop. Society (APCO) Fabrics Offering Handloom Fabrics in the State), Hyderabad. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.Venkataramana Counsel for the respondent: Sri T.Venkata Raju Goud ?Cases referred 1.AIR 197.S.C. 2641 ORDER: In this writ petition an order passed by the respondent in reference No.4/99/Admin.1(5)CO/2000/3066, dated 15-09-2000 terminating the service of the petitioner from the post of Assistant Designer is challenged on the ground that the said termination is arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Assistant Designer with all consequential benefits including the benefit of voluntary retirement scheme. 2. The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Designer by an order of appointment dated 11-03-1986. Clause 4 of the said appointment order reads as follows...
Brij Gopal Pallod and Others Vs. Municipal Council Rep. by G. Vasudeva ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.854 o31. 10-2012 Brij Gopal Pallod & others Municipal Council rep. by G. Vasudeva Reddy, Zaheerabad Municipality, Medak District Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Sr. Counsel Counsel for respondent : Sri S. Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, S.C. : Citations:1. (2009) 2 SCC 40.2) (2008) 5 SCC 11.3) (2006) 6 SCC 49.4) (2005) 4 SCC 48.5) (2005) 6 SCC 34.JUDGMENT: Zaheerabad Municipality, the respondent herein filed O.S.No.139 of 2007 in the Court of Principal District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, against the petitioners herein for the relief of declaration to the effect that it is the absolute owner and possessor of Ac.18.11 guntas of land in Sy.Nos.145 and 146 of Zaheerabad Revenue Village, shown in plaint A and B schedule; for perpetual injunction, and for direction to the petitioners to hand over the vacant possession of the property. It was pleaded that Ac.225.03 guntas, including the suit land, was earmarked by the Jagi...
T.Niranjan Vs. Ch.Ramesh Chander Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO Tr.C.M.P.No.537 OF 201.31.10.2012 T.Niranjan Ch.Ramesh Chander Reddy Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 201.AP 10.2) 1913 Indian Case3. AIR 196.CALCUTTA 56 ORDER:- This petition is filed for transfer of O.S.No.644 of 2010 on the file of the Court of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, to the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, as the connected suits O.S.No.317 of 2010 and O.S.No.248 of 2011 are pending on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. It is alleged that the petitioner is the defendant in all the three suits and there was an understanding with regard to the payments of the amounts and the defence in all the suits is common and nature of evidence to be adduced is the same. When this Court questioned as to why the application is filed before this Court when the remedy under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short,...
M/S.Philips Electronics India Ltd. Rep. Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.33904 o31. 10-2012 M/s.Philips Electronics India Ltd. Rep. by Ms.Roop Loomba and 2 others The Govt. of A.P. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Legal Metrology Dept., and 2 others. ^Counsel for the petitioners: Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy !Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Metrology : ?Cases referred: NIL Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the seizure of 2 packages containing Philips DVD Video Player bearing Model not DVP3868X/94, manufactured by petitioner No.1, from the custody of petitioner No.2, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Metrology representing the respondents. Petitioner No.1 is the manufacturer of electronic goods and Petitioner No.2 is its franchisee. On 19-05-2012, respondent No.3- District Inspector of Legal Metrology, Guntur, inspected the trading premises of petitioner No.2 and se...
Kalavakuri Mallikarjuna Rao and Others Vs. the Government of Andhra Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.884 of 2011; 4593 o31. 10-2012 Kalavakuri Mallikarjuna Rao & others The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary-Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ravi Prasad Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Revenue : Citations: COMMON ORDER: For the sake of convenience the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in W.P.No.4593 of 2012. The 1st petitioner alone filed W.P.No.884 of 2011, with a prayer to declare the action of the Tahsildar, Kandukur, the 3rd respondent, in interfering with his possession and enjoyment of Ac.1.12 cents of land in Sy.No.91/IC of Kandukur Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, without initiating any proceedings as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. He pleaded that the land was owned by one, Sri Dama Kondaiah (3rd petitioner), and the latter executed a gift settlement deed dated 23-08-2008, settling Ac.1.12 cents of land in Sy.No.91/...
1.Eesa Koteswara Rao @ Kotaiah,s/O Nag Vs. 1. the State of A.P., Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.854 o31. 10-2012 Brij Gopal Pallod & others Municipal Council rep. by G. Vasudeva Reddy, Zaheerabad Municipality, Medak District Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Sr. Counsel Counsel for respondent : Sri S. Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, S.C. : Citations:1. (2009) 2 SCC 40.2) (2008) 5 SCC 11.3) (2006) 6 SCC 49.4) (2005) 4 SCC 48.5) (2005) 6 SCC 34.JUDGMENT: Zaheerabad Municipality, the respondent herein filed O.S.No.139 of 2007 in the Court of Principal District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, against the petitioners herein for the relief of declaration to the effect that it is the absolute owner and possessor of Ac.18.11 guntas of land in Sy.Nos.145 and 146 of Zaheerabad Revenue Village, shown in plaint A and B schedule; for perpetual injunction, and for direction to the petitioners to hand over the vacant possession of the property. It was pleaded that Ac.225.03 guntas, including the suit land, was earmarked by the Jagi...
M/S Kapil Chit Fund (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Musuku Su ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party has filed appeal challenging the order of the District Forum. 2. The respondent joined in the chit group bearing reference no ADM04F-1-5 with the appellant for the chit value of `1,50,000/- and the monthly subscription payable for the chit is `5,000/- in duration of 30 months. The chit commenced on 28.-09-2007 and was terminated on 28.02.2010. The monthly subscription was agreed to be paid on or before 10th day of every month. The respondent contended that the agent of the appellant-chit fund company used to collect the subscription at the house of the respondent as he failed to turn up, the respondent could not pay the subscription for the month of October,2009 and when he visited the office of the appellant-chit fund company, he came to know that his membership was removed from the rolls of the chit subscribers. The respondent claimed for the amount paid for 23 months @`5,000/-, an amount of `1,15,000/- a...
M/S.R.K.Township Promoters (P) Ltd. and Another Vs. Sri G. Jaya Prakas ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
Oral Order (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite parties no. 1 and 2 have filed appeal contending that the respondent has to pay balance sale consideration of `2,00,000/- and get the plot registered in his name and the District Forum ought not to have directed for refund of the amount and that the respondent is a defaulter and that as per the contents of the agreement of sale, the respondent has to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the first respondent on or before 28.02.2009. It is contended that the complaint is not filed within the period of limitation and that the respondent is not a consumer as also that there was no deficiency in service on the part of the appellants. 2. The case of the respondent is that he paid an amount of Rs.4 lakh towards the cost of the plot measuring 200 sq.yards @`3,000/- per square yard, to the appellants during the month of November,2007 and as no development work was commenced, the respondent demanded the appellants to return the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »