Andhra Pradesh Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Salem Venkata Ramana Vs. Mellacheruvu Umamaheswar Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3913 o24. 01.2012 Salem Venkata Ramana Mellacheruvu Umamaheswar Rao and another Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Chetluru Sreenivas Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared CASES REFERRED:1. 2010(4) SCC 78.2. (1990) 4 SCC 59.3. (2008) 11 SCC 20.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order, dated 11.07.2011, in I.A.No.262 of 2011 in O.S.No.32 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Khammam. Even though notice is served on both the respondents and proof of service is filed vide U.S.R.No.1701 of 2011, no one appeared for the respondents. I have heard Sri Chetluru Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.32 of 2009 filed for specific performance of agreement of sale. The respondents who are defendants in the suit filed I.A.No.262 of 2011 for framing additional issues. The petitioner filed a cou...
Syed Yakub and Another Vs. Bee Amma Begum and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1429 o24. 01.2012 Syed Yakub and another Bee Amma Begum and another ^Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Kowturu Vinay Kumar !Counsel for the Respondents: Sri J.A.Qureshi ORDER: The petitioners, who are defendant Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.14 of 2010 filed by respondent No.1, filed this Civil Revision Petition feeling aggrieved by order, dated 03.11.2010, in I.A.No.523 of 2010 in O.S.No.14 of 2010, whereby the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Khammam partly allowed the said application. The facts in brief which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of this Civil Revision Petition are stated as under: - The petitioners are the sons of respondent No.2 and brothers of respondent No.1. Respondent No.1, a married woman and living with her husband separately, filed the above-mentioned suit for partition and allotment of 1/5th share of the suit schedule properties to her. Respondent No.1 filed I.A.No.523 o...
Kambala Venkanna Naidu Vs. the Andhra Bank, Rep.by Its Authorised O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.27821 OF 201.24.01.2012 Kambala Venkanna Naidu The Andhra Bank, Rep.by its Authorised Officer & The Chief Manager, Palkole Branch, Palakole, West Godavari District and another Counsel for Petitioner: Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar Counsel for Respondents: Sri V.Raghu Cases referred 1. AIR 198.SC 105.ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) A short question of considerable significance in the enforcement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereafter, the SARFAESI Act or the Act), would arise for consideration in this Writ Petition filed by a borrower of Andhra Bank, Royapet Branch, Narsapur, West Godavari District. The question is whether the Branch Chief Manager (BCM) of Andhra Bank, Palakol Branch, is competent to issue a demand notice under Section 13 (2) of the said Act when the loan was sanctioned by the Royapet ...
Y.V. Narasimha Murhty Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited, Repr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
Oral Order : (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The appellant is a Senior Citizen and he is a member of the family consisting of himself, his wife and two children. He was hale and healthy. The appellant as a measure of social security had joined the Group Insurance for the benefit of his family in the event of ill health. The appellant was introduced through the Banker-4th respondent as he was having term deposit account with it. The Policy was non-medical and he was not asked to furnish the details of health either of him or any one of his family members. The respondents had accepted the proposal of the appellant and treated him as a member of the policy bearing No.050400/48/05/00551. On 19.05.2006 the appellant had chest pain and was admitted to Appolo Hospital where he was treated by Dr. P.V. Naresh Kumar and he had incurred expenditure for an amount of `1,87,324/- towards hospitalization and medical expenses fo...
Rasi Seeds Company Limited and Another Vs. Gundla Nadipanna and Anothe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
Oral Order (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) This revision petition is preferred against the order of the District Forum directing them to approach the State Commission in order to pass appropriate orders for withdrawal of the amounts deposited towards statutory amount. The complainant filed CC No.17/2001 alleging that the seeds sold by the opposite parties were defective and the complaint was allowed. An appeal was preferred by the opposite parties by depositing the statutory amount before the District Forum which was dismissed. Thereafter they preferred second appeal before the National Commission which was remanded to the District Forum for fresh disposal. The District Forum allowed the complaints remanded by the National Commission and the opposite parties want to prefer appeal before the State Commission and hence they filed the present petition for return of the statutory amount made before the District Forum and enable them to deposit the same before the State Commi...
M/S. Saisha Finance and Chits Rep. by Its Managing Partner and Another ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
Oral Order : (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) The learned counsel for revision petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the revision. Permission accorded. In the result R.P.(SR) No.34/2012 is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs....
V.Sudhakar Vs. R.Ram Mohanrao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2012
R.KANTHA RAO, J.COMMON JUDGMENT:1. Crl.R.C.No.1249 of 2004 arises out of Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2004 in S.C.No.24 of 2004 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District.2. Crl.R.C.No.1250 of 2004 arises out of Crl.M.P.No.16 of 2004 in S.C.No.27 of 2003 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District.3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/complainant, first respondent/accused and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State/second respondent.4. The brief facts giving rise for filing the criminal revision cases are that the wife of the revisionist Smt.T.Bazaramma was working as Bill Collector in Gram Panchayat, Uppal Kalan Municipality was having some disputes with the then Municipal Commissioner G.Ram Narayana Reddy and also some municipal staff which led to departmental action against her by withholding increments, future promotion, recovery of some amounts and surrendering her services to the Controller...
The Fishermen Marketing Cooperative Soci Vs. the Commissioner of Fishe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2012
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J.ORDER :1) The petitioner-society represented by its president questions proceedings of the 1st respondent/Commissioner of fisheries initiating enquiry under Section 51 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act (in short, the Act) against the affairs of the society on two grounds viz., (1) that the requirements under Section 51 of the Act are not existing for ordering enquiry thereunder; and (2) that since the 2nd respondent-Deputy Director of Fisheries is also notified as Registrar in respect of fishermen cooperative society, the Commissioner may not exercise the powers of Registrar under Section 51 of the Act.2) By G.O.Ms.No.1968, F&A, dated 14.06.1966, the Governor of Andhra Pradesh designated the Deputy Director of Fisheries dealing with the administration of Fishermen Co-operative Societies as Deputy Director of Fisheries and Ex-officio Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies. The said G.O whereby the Deputy Director was designated as Ex-officio Joint Regist...
Perim Janardhana Rao So. Perim Raja Vs. Malepati Balaji So. M.Pushpaia ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2012
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.JUDGMENT:1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.107/2007 is the revision petitioner. He filed the said suit against the respondents for declaring that the suit schedule property is nominally purchased in the name of defendant Nos.1 and 2 from out of the amounts received by defendant Nos.1 and 3 from him and for granting permanent injunction restraining defendant Nos.1 and 2 and persons claiming through them from in any manner alienating the suit schedule properties.2. The plea of the petitioner was that he has in all paid Rs.3,20,45,826-50 ps. to defendant Nos.1 to 3 for purchase of properties in his name and that the suit schedule property was purchased in the name of defendant Nos.1 and 2 nominally from out of the monies advanced by him. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1913/2008 on 26-12-2008 before the court of V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, seeking amendment of the pleadings and the prayer in the suit. The said application was transferred to the court of the learned...
Linga Reddi Lakshmana Reddy, So.Chenga Vs. the State,rep. by the Autho ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2012
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.Order:1. The civil revision petition is filed against the common judgment dated 12-02-2002 in L.R.A.C.No.7 of 1990 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge cum Chairman, L.R.A.C.Tribunal, Chittoor, whereby he has confirmed the order dated 24-4-1990 in C.C.No.1277/SKHT/1975 on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal, Chittoor.2. I have heard Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation for the respondent at the hearing.3. One Linga Reddy Anki Reddy is the common ancestor. He had two sons, by name Pola Reddy and Rami Reddy. Pola Reddy had three sons. The petitioner is the son of one of the three sons, namely, Chinna Chenga Reddy. The petitioner and his father filed separate declarations under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act') before the Land Reforms Tribunal, Chandragiri (hereinafter referred to as 'primary tribunal'), wherein he ha...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »