Andhra Pradesh Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by the Regional Manager, Regional Of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
( Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha Honble Member ) These appeals are disposed of by a common order, since the facts are similar in all these appeals. F.A.No.110/2010: Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.79/2008 on the file of District Forum, Nellore, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant insured his lorry with opposite party No.3 under policy bearing No.501902/31/04/6300017 valid from 02-4-2005 to 01-4-2006. While so the lorry met with an accident on 22-12-2005 and the complainant intimated the same to opposite party No.3 and submitted the claim immediately. Opposite party No.3 got the vehicle surveyed at the accident spot and also conducted final survey at workshop and the surveyor submitted his report to opposite party No.3. The complainant further submitted relevant papers including bills claiming Rs.1,40,345/- to opposite party No.3 and made several requests to settle the claim and addressed a letter da...
Pramod Sanghi Vs. Chutneys Coffee House Opp:hindu Shamshan Ghat Banjar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.756/2009 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased mineral water for which opposite party No.1 charged Rs.25/- when the actual price is Rs.14/- only. It is the case of the complainant that the mineral water consumed by him in the opposite partys restaurant was manufactured by opposite parties 2 and 3 and the bottle does not reflect the maximum retail price and thereby opposite parties 2 and 3 violated the packaging rules prescribed under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1977 and hence the opposite parties are liable for unfair trade practice in charging more price than the MRP and also for selling the bottles without printing MRP on the bottles. Hence the complaint for a direction to the opposite parties to refund Rs.11/- charged more than the MRP., pay Rs.50,000/- towa...
Dr. G. Mohan Rao Vs. the Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupath
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
ORDER: 1. This writ petition is filed seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in regularizing the services of the petitioner as Principal in Sri Venkateswara College of Music and Dance, Tirupati, as unjust, illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Principal and pay him all the emoluments w.e.f. 31-12-1997. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed on 12-03-1970 as a Tutor in vocal in Sri Venkateswara College of Music and Dance, Tirupati run by Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams. He is totally blind by birth. He was selected on merit and was entrusted to teach vocal graduation classes. He has completed Masters Degree from S.V. University during 1966-68 and he was awarded Doctorate in Music by Delhi University in 1979. It is further alleged that he is the senior most and highly qualified Lecturer among the 23 teaching staff members in the col...
P.Seshagiri Rao and Another Vs. P.Soma Sekhar Rao and anr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.ORDER:1. This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 28.09.2011, in I.A.No.79 of 2011, in O.S.No.37 of 2003, on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad. The petitioners filed the suit against the respondents for declaration of their title and also for cancellation of the judgment and decree, dated 12.07.2002, in O.S.No.1203 of 2001, on the file of the learned XI Additional Junior Civil Judge, Secunderabad and for consequential injunction. The evidence has commenced in the year 2008. The respondents have confronted petitioner No.1, who was examined as PW.1 with Exs.B5 and B6, which were the purported receipts issued by the petitioners. After closure of the evidence on the petitioners' side and during the course of evidence of the respondents' side, Ex.B10 was marked through the chief examination of DW.2 in June, 2010. The petitioners filed I.A.No.79 of 2011 for sending Exs.B5, B6 and B10 for the opinion of an expert as to the genuinen...
Commissioner of Income Tax, VijayawadA. Vs. Ms.O.R.Distilleriesltd., T ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
COMMON ORDER:1. These two Referred Cases can be disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the assessment of income tax of the same assessee, namely, M/s.O.R.Distilleries Ltd., Tirupathi. In R.C.No.254 of 1996, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) referred the following questions under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), for opinion of this Court. 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT is correct in holding that the article or thing, viz., alcohol including rectified spirit and denatured spirit manufactured by the assessee company do not come under the ambit of Eleventh Schedule of the I.T.Act, 1961? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT is correct in law in holding that the assessee company is entitled to investment allowance u/s.32A of the I.T.Act, 1961 for the asst.year 86-87? In R.C.No.77 of 1997 the ITAT referred the following two questions for the opinion of this Court. 1. Whether on th...
Commissioner of Income Tax, VijayawadA. Vs. Ms.O.R.Distilleries Ltd., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
V.V.S.RAO; B.N.RAO NALLA, J.COMMON ORDER:1. These two Referred Cases can be disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the assessment of income tax of the same assessee, namely, M/s.O.R.Distilleries Ltd., Tirupathi. In R.C.No.254 of 1996, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) referred the following questions under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), for opinion of this Court. 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT is correct in holding that the article or thing, viz., alcohol including rectified spirit and denatured spirit manufactured by the assessee company do not come under the ambit of Eleventh Schedule of the I.T.Act, 1961? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT is correct in law in holding that the assessee company is entitled to investment allowance u/s.32A of the I.T.Act, 1961 for the asst.year 86-87? In R.C.No.77 of 1997 the ITAT referred the following two questions for the opinion of ...
Commissioner of Income-tax, VijayawadA. Vs. Ms.Vijaya Vani Educational ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) In R.C.No.46 of 1998 under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad, had referred the following six questions for the opinion of this Court. 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in holding after an overall appraisal of the clauses of the Trust Deed that the Trust was for charitable purposes within the meaning of s.2 (15) of the IT Act? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the original infirmity in clause III (aims and objects of the association) of the Trust Deed stood rectified after the amendment to the clauses of the Trust Deed in October, 1989? 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the amendment of a Deed of a Codicil has a retrospective effect and consequently...
Smt.K.Sri Rekha Vs. Sri K.Vijay Krishna
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J.Order:1. This Civil Revision Petition is a vexatious piece of litigation indulged in by the petitioner, who seems to think that she can approach this Court again and again by raising the same issue, which was raised in the previous rounds of litigation, wherein she has conclusively lost. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent, who filed OP.No.312 of 2009 before the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, for declaration that the marriage between him and the petitioner is a nullity. Pending the said OP, the petitioner filed IA.No.296 of 2010 for dismissing the OP on the ground that the respondent failed to satisfy the ingredients of Section 12 (1) (c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'). By detailed Order, dated 30th July, 2010, the lower Court dismissed the said application. Challenging the said order, the petitioner filed CRP.No.4303 of 2010, which was dismissed as withdrawn by Order, dated 24-09-2010. The petitioner again took her chance by f...
Commissioner of Income-tax, VijayawadA. Vs. M/S.Vijaya Vani Educationa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA R.C.NOs.46 OF 199.AND 4.OF 200.27.01.2012 Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vijayawada. M/s.Vijaya Vani Educational Trust, Chowdepalle Counsel for Petitioner: Senior Counsel for Income Tax Counsel for Respondent: Sri J.V.Prasad Ms. Pushpan Kiran Cases referred 1. (2011) 339 ITR 33.(AP) 2. (2011) 332 ITR 61.(AP) 3. (2011) 334 ITR 25.(AP) 4. (1996) 217 ITR 69.(SC) 5. (1976) 103 ITR 77.(SC) 6. (1971) 82 ITR 70.: (1971) 3 SCC 47.7. (2011) 333 ITR 34.(AP) 8. (2011) 334 ITR 30.(AP) And one other case. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA R.C.NOs.46 OF 199.AND 4.OF 200.COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) In R.C.No.46 of 1998 under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad, had referred the following six questions for the opinion of this Court. 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of...
P.Seshagiri Rao and Another Vs. P.Soma Sekhar Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5388 o27. 01.2012 P.Seshagiri Rao and another P.Soma Sekhar Rao and another ^Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms.Manjiri S.Ganu !Counsel for respondents: Sri R.A.Achutanand Cases referred:1. AIR 197.SC 1.2. 2008-AWC-4-3790 3. AIR 200.AP 16.ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 28.09.2011, in I.A.No.79 of 2011, in O.S.No.37 of 2003, on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad. The petitioners filed the suit against the respondents for declaration of their title and also for cancellation of the judgment and decree, dated 12.07.2002, in O.S.No.1203 of 2001, on the file of the learned XI Additional Junior Civil Judge, Secunderabad and for consequential injunction. The evidence has commenced in the year 2008. The respondents have confronted petitioner No.1, who was examined as PW.1 with Exs.B5 and B6, which were the purported receipts issued by the petitioners. After closure of the e...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »