Andhra Pradesh Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Guntur City House Construction Coope Vs. the Tahsildar, Guntur Man ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P. No.26566 o18. 01.2012 The Guntur City House Construction Cooperative Society Ltd. The Tahsildar, Guntur Mandal and another. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Vijaya Kiran Counsel for the respondent: Government Pleader for Revenue. ORDER: The petitioner is a Cooperative Housing Society. It has acquired properties in various survey numbers of Koritapadu village, Guntur mandal. The land purchased is said to have been converted into plots by obtaining necessary permission and clearance from the concerned authorities. The petitioner intended to execute sale deeds in favour of its members by transferring the plots so carved out. The petitioner approached the Sub-Registrar, Koritapadu, Guntur District, the second respondent herein seeking necessary information for the purpose of presenting the documents for registration. In the process, the second respondent has furnished a copy of the proceedings dated 30.08.2010 issued by the Tahsildar, Guntur Dis...
B.Venu Madhav, S/O.Late Sri B.Mohan Rao Vs. National Consumer Disputes ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30394 o18. 01.2012 B.Venu Madhav, S/o.Late Sri B.Mohan Rao National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Represented by its Registrar, New Delhi And others Counsel for petitioner: Mr.Chandraiah Sunkara Counsel for Respondent No.1: Mr.Krishna Mohan Sikharam Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: -- CITATIONS:1. (1997) 3 SCC 26.: AIR 199.SC 112.2. (2009) 7 SCC 76.3. Civil Appeal No.10706 of 2011, dated 07.12.2011 4. (1994) 1 SCC 24.: AIR 199.SC 78.ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) In this writ petition the order dated 14.10.2011 in Revision Petition No.478 of 2007 passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereafter, the National Commission) is assailed as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction, with a further prayer to set aside the same. The brief fact of the matter to the extent necessary for in limine disposal of the writ petition...
J. Shravan Kumar and Others Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Pros ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.7735 o18. 01.2012 J.Shravan Kumar and others State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor Counsel for Petitioner : Sri Aadesh Varma Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor CASES REFERRED:1. 2007 (1) FAC 19.2. 2009 (2) FAC 22.3. 2007 (1) FAC 4.4. 2006 (1) FAC 23.5. 2006 (1) FAC 10.6. 2011 (1) FAC 14.7. AIR 198.SC 61.8. 2009 (2) FAC 36.9. 2006 (1) FAC 15.10. 2007 (1) ALD (Cri) 316 = 2007 CriLJ 111.ORDER:- In this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Code) the petitioners herein who are A-1, A-3, A-4 and A-5 in C.C.No.1021 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate (Mobile Court), Ranga Reddy District (trial court), are seeking quashing of the said case against them.2. The aforesaid case has been instituted by Food Inspector, Division-I, Ranga Reddy District, and the offence alleged against the petitioners is sale of adulterated groundnut oil punishable under Se...
M/S. Global Impex Represented by Its Pro Vs. M/S. Greenply Industries ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY C.R.P.No.4666 o18. 1-2012 M/s. Global Impex Represented by its ProprietorRajesh Mandoth, Mysore,Karnataka M/s. Greenply Industries Ltd.,Represented by its G.P.A. Holder Dr. Rama Krishna, Hyderabad. Counsel for petitioner : Sri N. Subba Rao Counsel for respondent : -- ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 15-7-2011 in I.A.No.2009/2008 in O.S.No.55/2008 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Judge- Fast Track Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.55/2008 filed by the respondent, alleging infringement of copyright. The petitioner filed I.A.No.2009/2008 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of the plaint mainly on three grounds, namely, (i) that no part of cause of action had arisen within the jurisdiction of the Court in which the suit is filed; (ii) that the defendant was not properly described, thereby no cause arose in respect of the defendant as s...
Durgam Anitha, W/O.Late Durgam Darshanam Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION No.17909 o18. 01.2012 Durgam Anitha, W/o.Late Durgam Darshanam And another State Bank of Hyderabad, represented by its Authorised Officer, Mahboobgunj Branch, Hyderabad And others Counsel for petitioner: Mr.B.Venkata Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Mr.Ambadipudi Satyanarayana Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: -- CITATIONS:1. (2010) 8 SCC 11.: AIR 201.SC 341.2) (1998) 8 SCC 1 : AIR 199.SC 2.3) AIR 199.SC 101.4) (1992) 1 SCC 41.: AIR 199.1780 5) (1992) 4 SCC 6.: AIR 199.SC 122.6) (2003) 6 SCC 23.= AIR 200.SC 268.ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The petitioners are allegedly owners of land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in S.No.150 situated at Doolapally village of Qutbullapur Mandal in Ranga Reddy District District, by virtue of Occupancy Rights Certificate (ORC) dated 06.4.1998 issued to them under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955. They statedly purchased anothe...
M/S Kapil Chit Fund (P) Ltd. Vs. Smt Farahana
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
Oral Order : (As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant company. The respondent filed compliant seeking direction to the appellant company to pay an amount of `22,000/- together with interest @24% p.a. and to pay `50,000/- towards damages on account of unfair trade practice and deficiency in service. 2. The respondent joined in the chit group bearing reference no.NMIH -25 with the appellant company for the chit value of `3 lakh and the monthly subscription payable is `10,000/- in duration of 30 months. The respondent claimed to have paid a sum of `1205/-, `2,000/-, `1200/- and `5,000/- on 25-11-2003, 27-12-2003, 19-01-2004 and 18-02-2004 respectively and she has also said to have paid `1875/- for which receipts stated to have not been passed and the appellant company said to have made entries in the pass book to the extent of payment of `10,000/- and having come to know the discrepancy in the entries of the pass book, she demanded the appellant compan...
Kishore Kashiwale Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.75/2008 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of Lorry No.AP12U 1103 registered under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and insured the same with the opposite party vide Policy bearing No.052100/31/05/01203 dated 11-5-2005 valid from 12-5-2005 to 11-5-2006 and paid a premium of Rs.10,089/-. On 09-6-2005 the lorry met with an accident at Kurkumbh ghat Village on Pune Solapur Road in Maharashtra State at about 11.30 p.m. and a case was registered vide FIR No.103/2005 dated 10-6-2005. According to the panchanama, the vehicle met with an accident while the driver of the vehicle tried to overtake another vehicle and severe loss and damage was caused to the vehicle and due to the accident two persons died on the spot and others received minor injuries. At the time of the accident, t...
Sri Muppidi Eswara Rao Vs. Icici Bank Limited Rep. by Its Branch Manag ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
Oral Order : (As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. Feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded of `28,480/-with interest @9%p.a. towards refund of the amount paid by him, `1,00,000/- towards compensation and costs of `8,000/- . the complainant filed the appeal contending that the amount awarded is inadequate. 2. The facts of the case leading to filing the appeal are that the appellant obtained house building loan of `2,50,000/- from the respondent bank on 21-09-2002 with floating rate of interest @ 11.25% payable in 133 equated monthly installments @ `3,202/-. The loan was to be repaid during the period from 7-11-2002 to 7-11-2013. The appellant deposited the title deeds of his property and post dated cheques as security for repayment of the loan amount. 3. The appellant claimed to have chosen for preclosure of loan account on the premise of the respondent charging excessive rate of overdue charges and on his filing application for grant of loan, the GIC Housing ...
M/S.Jayalakshmi Motors Rep. by Its Proprietor Bvk Bhagawan Vs. the Ori ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.507/2007 on the file of District Forum, Guntur, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of 2004 model Scorpio and insured the same with the opposite parties for the period from 13-12-2004 to 12-12-2005. While so, on 19-5-2005 the vehicle met with an accident and the complainant immediately informed to 2nd opposite party about the damages sustained and requested for appointment of a surveyor for assessing the damages. Accordingly the surveyor estimated the damages at Rs.2,55,166-47 ps and a job estimate was also given by M/s.Jayalakshmi Automotive, Guntur. After the second opposite party approved, the complainant affected repairs to a total extent of Rs.3,35,181. The complainant submitted the original bills along with police record and submitted that the opposite party agreed to reimburse Rs.2,55,167.47 ps. Thereafter ...
The General Manager (Personal) Head Office, Andhra Bank and Another Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.74/2010 on the file of District Forum-II, Vijayawada, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants husband during his life time availed house loan in the year by depositing house site patta and paid instalments upto 2001. The complainant submitted that later he failed to pay the instalments and was terminated under compulsory retirement on 28-6-2003 and at his request his retirement benefits were appropriated to his housing loan account and also obtained letter to clear the remaining balance from monthly pension. The complainants husband and did not pay any amount since January, 2005 due to his personal problems and died on 15-12-2007. Thereafter the complainant approached the opposite parties for pension and paid an amount of Rs.1,89,768/- towards house loan and requested the opposite parties to return the documents but the oppo...