Andhra Pradesh Court September 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D. Satya Murthy Vs. the Branch Manager L.i.C. of India Lower Tank Bund ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order of the Dist. Forum in denying bonus and interest under the policy. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he had taken LIC policy on his life for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- on 18.1.1960 for a period of 15 years the maturity date being 28.1.1975. On the advise of insurance company he had availed the option of conversion of above policy into increased paid-up whole life policy on 11.12.1971 and the same was accepted and endorsed on the policy. Since he had faced some health and financial problems he had decided to surrender the policy and intimated the same on 10.2.2001. Despite several letters and reminders over telephone he did not receive surrender value. However, on 19.4.2008 it had paid Rs. 10,000/- by way of demand draft. It did not pay either interest or bonus for all these years. Since non-payment of interest and bonus amounts to deficiency in servic...
The Managing Director Madhupala Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D. Vijaya Saradh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-21-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party a real estate company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to register the plot in respect of plot No. 126 or in the alternative refund Rs. 1,40,000/- with interest @ 18% p.a., from 2.3.2007 till the date of realization together with compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and costs of Rs. 5,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that she joined as a member in the venture floated by the appellant real estate company. It had agreed to sell residential plots admeasuring 200 sq.yds on payment of Rs. 2,000/- per month in 51 instalments. The appellant had given a discount of Rs. 10,000/-. Initially she paid Rs. 16,000/- on 27.8.2001. She had paid all the instalments and demanded the appellant to register the plot. However, it dragged on the matter. When she approached the appellant on 2.3.2007 again it had demanded Rs. 10,000/- more, and Rs. 14,000/- towards registrati...
The Secretary, the Kalikiri Co-op. Rural Bank Ltd. and Others Vs. Sri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2011
Oral Order:(Per Sri R.Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Honble Member.) 1. Both the appeals arise from the same order. F.A.No.937 of 2008 is filed by the opposite parties while the F.A.No.265 of 2010 is preferred by the complainant. The complainants sought for direction to the opposite parties to pay maturity amount of `12,84,840/- with interest @15%p.a. and future interest @24%p.a. as also an amount of `1,00,000/- towards compensation and costs . 2. The appellant no.1 is a retired employee of the 1st respondent bank and he and the 2nd appellant held a joint saving bank account bearing number 692 with the 1st respondent bank. The appellants invested the retirement benefits of the 1st appellant with the respondent no.1 bank, `50,000/- on 30-06-2001 for maturity value of `1,12,385/- under deposit receipt bearing number 18020, `50,000/- on 30-06-2001 for maturity value of `1,12,385/- under deposit receipt bearing number 18021, `50,000/- on 30-06-2001 for maturity value of `1,12,385/- under deposit r...
Dr. K. Vijaya Lakshmi Nursing Home and Others Vs. Gummadi Sridhar and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2011
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.80/2006 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada, the opposite parties preferred F.A.No.1362/08 and complainant preferred F.A.No.992/09. As both these appeals arise out of a common complaint, they are being disposed of by this common order. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant and his wife along with their minor son by name Gummadi Kartheek who was suffering with severe stomach ache approached Dr.M.Srinivas on 5.3.2004 at Gudivada who examined the complainants son and referred him to Annapurna Multispeciality Hospital where the doctors examined him and took an X-ray and advised him to go to Vijayawada for obtaining KUB Scanning. Accordingly, the complainant visited the opp.parties hospital on 6.3.2004 and on their advise, admitted his son in the hospital of opposite parties. Opposite parties sent the complainants son to Apollo Diagnostics, Vijayawada for...
The Chief General Manager, Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited A.P.Circle Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2011
Oral Order:(Per Sri R.Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Honble Member.) 1. The opposite party, Bharth Sanchar Nigam Limited is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint seeking direction to the appellant to erect tower at Gandhi Road, Chittoor and for payment of `50,000/- towards damages and costs. 2. The respondent is subscriber of the appellants with mobile phone service connection bearing No.9440737704 and he complained to the appellants no.1 and 2 by letter dated 25.4.2007 that the existing cell tower does not meet the requirement of the customers and requested them to erect a new tower at Gandhi Road, Chittoor or enhance the power of existing tower. The first appellant visited the office-cum-residence of the respondent and made enquiry as to the signals within the premises of the respondent. The respondent subsequently had sent letter dated 15.10.2007 to the appellant no.5 requesting to furnish information about the capacity of cell tower in Chittoor town for which the 5th appellant had ...
The Branch Manager Union Bank of India Manakondur Branch Karimangar Di ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) The opposite party bank preferred this appeal against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to refund Rs. 14,012.50 with interest @ 9% p.a., from the date of filing of the complaint till the date of payment together with costs of Rs. 1,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that it has been running a law college recognized by APSCHE affiliated to Kakatiya University approved by Bar Council of India. In compliance of formalities for recognition it required to furnish bank guarantee for Rs. 7.5 lakhs which was issued by the appellant bank for three years on payment of Rs. 67,500/- @ Rs. 22,500/- per year from 31.12.1999 to 31.12.2002. Later there was a change of formalities of affiliation and therefore it has cancelled the bank guarantee from 31.12.2001 after completion of two years. It had deposited cash of Rs. 7.5 lakhs and also deposited Rs. 2.5 lakhs in FDR for a period of 10 years. It sought for refund of ...
Mrs. Zohra HussaIn Chogani Vs. M/S. Suchir India Developers (P) Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-19-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is a complained filed u/s 17(a)(1) of the Consumer Protection Act for refund of Rs. 73,05,342/- with interest @ 24% p.a., together with compensation of Rs. 50,000/- and costs. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that the opposite party a developer floated a venture for sale of plots under the name and style of Gold Coast. It has agreed to sell developed plots of 240 sq.yds at Rs. 6 lakhs viz., Rs. 2,500/- per sq.yd. in the tentative layout with a promise that the final layout would be obtained in due course as per the scheme. It was further informed that she was liable to pay Rs. 5,000/- towards enrollment charges, Rs. 70,000/- towards reservation of plot and the balance of Rs. 5,25,000/- in 24 monthly instalments @ Rs. 21,875/- each besides Rs. 250/- towards admission fee. It was further informed that there would be other benefits to the members such as bumper draw, super bumper draw etc. Extra cost of Rs. 100/...
The Branch Manager United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. N. Malyadri
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-19-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 1,06,500/- with interest @ 9% p.a., from the date of filing of the complaint viz., 6.6.2006 till the date of realization. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he purchased an auto bearing No. AP 26 U 9521 under hire purchase agreement with the financier and got it insured with the appellant on 17.4.2003. While so on 13.7.2003 he kept the vehicle in front of his house, and by 5.00 a.m. he found that the vehicle was stolen. After making search he got a report issued to the police on 21.11.2003 which was registered it as a case in Crime No. 19/2003. After one year on 3.12.2004 they issued a certificate that it was not traceable. Immediately it was informed to the insurance company along with documents followed by registered lawyer notice on 10.4.2006 for which it gave reply with false and vexatious alle...
The Chairman, Andhra Bank Head Office and Another Vs. Smt. Nakkala Jay ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appal preferred by Andhra Bank against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to credit Rs. 50,000/- to the S.B. account of the complainant with interest @ 9% p.a., together with compensation of Rs. 2,000/- and costs of Rs. 500/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that she deposited a sum of Rs. 50,000/- and Rs. 1 lakh in her S.B. account with Op2 branch as she was receiving amounts from her relations from Gulf countries. Later she came to learn that one Mr. B. Jaya Raju, Clerk-cum-Cashier misappropriated the amounts. On verification of her account she fund that the amounts were not entered into the account or ledger of the bank. On complaint the police registered it as a case in Crime No. 228/2007 u/s 409 and 420 IPC pending trial. When she demanded refund of the amount the appellant did not pay. She gave legal notice for which the appellant bank gave reply. Alleging deficiency in service she filed t...
Suraksha Enterprises Vs. Pasham Bhaskar Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-14-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 4,30,000/- with interest 9% p.a., and Rs. 8,000/- per month towards loss and Rs. 5,000/- towards costs. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that when he intended to purchase a tractor for the purpose of earning and on his request the appellant being a dealer of the tractor issued a quotation for Rs. 4,30,000/-. Accordingly Rs. 4,30,000/- by way of pay order of Andhra Bank dt. 23.3.2007 was issued. Basing on which he obtained loan for Rs. 3 lakhs and remaining Rs. 1,30,000/- was paid by him. As per the loan agreement he has to pay Rs. 41,000/- half yearly towards instalment. The appellant promised to deliver the vehicle within four days on receipt of amount. However, it did not do so. For a period of nine months it did not comply, and finally on 15.12.2007 he demanded either deliver the tractor or refund the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »