Andhra Pradesh Court August 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Col.S.P.Putchala (Retd.) S/O.P.Mallikarjuna Rao and Another Vs. Cox an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) This is a cheque petition filed by the petitioners to issue cheque for Rs.30,000/- with accrued interest, if any, in favour of the first petitioner. Heard both sides. The learned counsel for the respondents in his counter affidavit submitted that the complainants are entitled to an amount of Rs.7,000/- only and contended in his counter affidavit that totally an amount of Rs.1,30,000/- was deposited before this Commission as well as National Commission. Due to wrong interpretation of the order, they have also issued a cheque for Rs.82,000/- dated 17-6-2011. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he is entitled to this amount of Rs.30,000/- which has been deposited before this Commission in view of the orders of the National Commission. The order of the National Commission in R.P.1557/2006 dated 30/8/2010 reads as follows: We therefore set aside the order of the State Commission by which petitioners have been asked...
Gitam Institute of International Business and Another Vs. Suryadevera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
Oral Order : (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.247/08 on the file of Dist.Forum-II, Vijayawada, Krishna, the opp.parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant paid Rs.1 lakh on 7.7.08 to the Administrative Officer of the opposite party University and obtained seat confirmation letter in NRI quota for the academic year 2008-09 in PGDIB Course for the complainants son. The complainant submits that he paid another sum of Rs.2 lakhs on 7.7.08 by way of two DDs drawn on SBI, Vijayawada and paid the same to the opposite parties towards one year fee and paid Rs.30,000/- towards hostel fees. The classes commenced on 1.8.08 and the complainants son became ill and attended classed for only one week and did not attend classes from 7.8.08 and wrote a letter to the opposite party on 28.8.08 enclosing a doctor certificate to pay back the said amounts and on receiving the said letter the hostel authorities returne...
M/S Mahavir Associates and Another Vs. M/S Mahavir Lok Chamber Ownerâ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. 2. The opposite parties entered into development agreement-cum-GPA dated 16.3.19997 with the President of complainant association for development of property, bearing H.No.3-5-907/2 to 9 and 3-5-908 admeasuring 1400 sq.yards situated at Himayatnagar, Hyderabad and the opposite parties in pursuance of the agreement constructed a commercial complex under the name and style of Mahaveer Lok. As per the terms of the agreement opposite parties are entitled to 48% share in the super built up area and the complainant association is entitled to 52% share in the property. The opposite parties had sold their 48% share to the prospective purchasers. The complainants found defects in the construction of the complex, such as seepage of water during rainy season causing damage to the fittings and fixtures to interior walls and ceiling. The President of the complainant association got issued notic...
Smt. Vanguri Venkata Lakshmi Prasanna Vs. M/S. Bhavanam Estates Pvt. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
Smt. M. Shreesha, Member: Aggrieved by the order C.C.No.139/09 on the file of Dist.Forum-III, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the case are that one K.Venkata Subbaraya Sarma purchased flat no.206 in Riviera Apartments by way of registered Sale Deed from opposite party no.1 on 7.9.1992 for a sale consideration of Rs.6,80,000/- and thereafter the said K.Venkata Subbaraya Sarma executed a Gift Deed in respect of flat no.206 admeasuring 1820 sq.ft. including common area and Car Parking together with undivided share of 50 sq.yards. in favour of the complainant by means of gift settlement deed on 19.9.2007. It is the complainants case that Car Parking P-16 was earmarked by opposite party no.1 on 11.11.03. Thereafter opposite party no.2 occupied the said car parking slot and the complainant sent a letter to opposite party no.3 on 14.1.08 and requested them to go through the documents earmarking P-16 as car parking to her. Opposite party no.2 rep...
Uppalapati Vijaya Lakshmi Vs. Cherukuri Lokanadha Rao (Died) Per L.Rs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2011
1. The 2nd defendant in O.S.No.5 of 1998 on the file of the District Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam is the appellant herein. 2. The suit was one filed for specific performance of contract of sale by the plaintiff alleging that the 1st defendant is the absolute owner of the property and agreed to sell the property @Rs.75,000/- per acre and executed an agreement of sale on 30.01.1995. A sum of Rs.4,00,000/- is said to have been paid and in spite of repeated demands, the 1st defendant postponed the execution of the sale deed and a notice was also given but after the demand made by the plaintiff by virtue of the registered deed dated 01.04.1996 and without giving reply he executed a registered sale deed dated 10.12.1996 in favour of the 2nd defendant, who is his sister and delivered possession to her. It is a fraudulent transaction and, therefore, both the defendants are liable to execute the sale deed or to refund the amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with interest at 12% per annum. 3. Th...
M/S.Surat Goods Transport Service Vs. M/S. Golconda Engg. Enterprises ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2011
1. By this company petition under Sections 433(c), 434 (1)(a) and 439 (1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 95 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, the petitioner, M/s. Surat Goods Transport Service, a Partnership Firm registered under the Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as `petitioner'), seeks an order of winding up against the respondent-M/s. Golconda Engineering Enterprises Ltd., a public limited company having its registered office at Surya Towers, S.P.Road, Secunderabad (hereinafter referred to as `respondent'). The respondent company is one of the Group companies of M/s. Surana group having functional and financial integrity. 2(a). The petitioner is doing business of transportation of goods of the customers as per the orders placed by them from time to time. The respondent deals in manufacture and sale of steel, strips, and cables etcetera. The respondent engaged the petitioner in transportation of its material/goods from one place to another. The petitioner ...
B.Satyanarayana Vs. A.P.Administrative Tribunal and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2011
The petitioner is working as a Clerk in Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC). Disciplinary enquiry was conducted by the third respondent. The Secretary, APSRTC, PF Trust, issued orders on 02.08.2006 reducing the pay of the petitioner by one incremental stage for a period of two years. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred an appeal to the Deputy Chief Accounts Officer (T&S), who rejected the same, on 09.10.2006. He, thereafter, filed O.A.No.17294 of 2008. The Registry of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (hereafter, Administrative Tribunal) raised an objection as to the maintainability in O.A.SR.No.17294 of 2008. By an order, dated 05.10.2010, the learned Administrative Tribunal upheld the office objection observing that the Government has not issued any notification vesting jurisdiction on the Administrative Tribunal to adjudicate the matters pertaining the service conditions of APSRTC employees. This order is assailed in the writ petition. L...
Yaralagada Naresh Babu Vs. the Principal, Govt. College of Physical Ed ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-02-2011
Oral Order (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order of dismissal of his complaint on the ground that he could not appear on the date of adjournment due to traffic jam. Considering the fact that all through he was contesting the matter, we are of the opinion that one more opportunity could be given to the complainant equally so to the opposite parties to prosecute their case. In the result this appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside and the District Forum is directed to restore the complaint to its original file and then dispose of the matter on merits after giving opportunity to both parties and also receive the written versions, if any, to be filed by the opposite parties and give opportunity to both sides to adduce evidence and advance arguments. Both parties are directed to be present before the District Forum on 22-8-2011 without insisting for fresh notice. However, there shall be no ...
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Personal Department and Others Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2011
Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd is the appellant. The first respondent while proceeding on a scoter met with an accident at about 8 A.M. on 22-04-1995 when a lorry hit the scooter and he was admitted to the hospital being maintained by the appellant company. The first respondent has requested the hospital authorities through application to extend the treatment to her husband. The doctors diagnosed the first respondent with polytrauma with multiple injuries and rupture of bladder. On 24-04-1995 the general surgeon, Dr.Somiah repaired the patients bladder and passed Foleys catheter. On the operation table one unit of blood was transfused to the patient and it was found that the acetabular fracture fragments were projecting on the bladder. Under general anesthesia the orthopedic surgeon, Dr.P.Sridhar applied right upper tibia pin traction. On 6-05-1995, the patient was discharged on 10.5.1995 from the hospital. Thereafter, the fir...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›