Andhra Pradesh Court August 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Munnangi Bhaskara Rao Vs. State Bank of India, Rep. by Its Branch Mana ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-10-2011
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member: Oral: 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The opposite party sanctioned educational loan of Rs. 1,40,000 to the son of the complainant which was to be paid in annual installments. The complainant and his wife stood as sureties for payment of the loan. The title deeds standing in the name of complainants wife Subbayamma, have been hypothecated with opposite party and they are still with them. The complainants son had completed his B.E. course and in January, 2007 left for the United States for further studies. As per the agreed terms towards the discharge of the loan the principal amount of loan has to be discharged in one year after the completion of the complainants sons studies and the interest is payable annually. On 15.3.2007 the opposite party got published notice in the Eenadu daily, Prakasam Edition whereunder the names of 27 defaulters including that of the complainants was published showing them as chronic Defaulters. It is con...
M/S. Sathyam Associates, Rep. by Its Managing Partner P. Rama Krishna ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-10-2011
Oral Oder: (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) F.A.No.1288/2009: Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.52/05 on the file of District Forum, Nellore, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant established a factory in Sy.No.532,534/2 and 3 in Nellore Rural Mandal in the year 2002 and opposite parties sanctioned Electricity Service Connection bearing no.69800 1013 for the said factory which manufactures Aqua Feeds. The opposite parties installed the meter on 16.12.2002 and the electricity supply was released to the said meter on 17.1.03. Four days after that when the complainant switched on AB Switch before the transformer, the fuses got burnt and the cable head turned black due to the burning of the wire. The complainant immediately reported the matter to AE and ADE (MRT). The authorities inspected the factory premises and removed the cable head and gave direct power supply to the cable without the head from the high tension li...
Kundeti Durga Rao Vs. the State of A.P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-2011
1) The appellant/accused was convicted of the offence under Section 8(c)/20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, the Act) and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for four months and fine of Rs.1,000/- by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge under the Act, Vijayawada by the impugned judgment in Sessions Case No.49 of 2003. Aggrieved by the same, the accused filed this appeal. 2) It is alleged that the accused was arrested while in possession of M.O- 1 Polythene bag containing 6 1/2 kgs of Ganja. Plea of the accused is one of total denial and not guilty. After trial, in which P.Ws 1 to 3 were examined and Exs.P-1 to P-7 and M.Os 1 and 2 were marked, the lower Court found the accused guilty of the charge. 3) In this appeal, the appellant's counsel contended that P.W-1 who is one of the mediators in Ex.P-1 to P-3 mediators' report, is an interested witness in as much as he worked as Home Guard in police Department and wor...
B. Venkatesh Vs. Manager Ikf Finance Ltd. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-08-2011
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member: 1. The complainant is the appellant. He had purchased a three wheeler goods carrier auto on hire purchase from the respondent. The appellant had obtained sanction for loan amount of Rs. 90,000 which was repayable on EMI basis. The appellant had paid certain number of instalments and thereafter on his committing default in payment of the EMI the respondent repossessed the vehicle and sold it away to third parties. 2. The appellant has contended that he had paid an amount of Rs. 12,348 as initial payment to M/s. Abhinandan Motors Pvt. Ltd., and a sum of Rs. 68,696 to the respondent besides making down payment of Rs. 48,348 and for the months of January and February 2009 he requested the respondent to grant him sometime to pay the EMIs for which the respondent had not heeded to and seized the vehicle and put it to sale in auction without issuing notice to him. 3. It is contended on behalf of the respondent that it had financed an amount of Rs. 90,000 to th...
The Branch Post Master, Post Office,palvoncha, Khammam District and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2011
Oral Order (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President)This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties, postal department, against the order of the District Forum directing them to pay Rs.1,50,000/- together with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of complaint i.e. 15-10-2007 till realization. The case of the complainants in brief is that the first complainant is the wife and complainant No.2 is the mother of late Narasimha Rao. He worked as U.D.C. and during his life time, he took insurance policy for Rs.1,50,000/-. While so, he died on 03-1-2007. When they approached for settlement of the claim, it was repudiated on the ground that assured applied for medical leave in the year 2003. The said fact was not disclosed in the proposal form. In fact he was hale and healthy. He did not violate any of the rules nor there was suppression of disease. Assailing the repudiation, she filed the complaint claiming Rs.1,50,000/- under the policy together with interest, compensation of Rs.2,00,0...
Vanapalli Lovaraju Vs. the Superintendent Sarojini Devi Eye Hospital H ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2011
Oral Order (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) The appellant is the unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brief is that he was working as Conductor in APSRTC in Kakinada Depot. When he was suffering from ailment of right eye, the Management directed the complainant to take treatment. He took treatment in several places as well as in Akira Eye Hospital, which is a Super Specialty Hospital for Laser Treatment and Cataract and Vitreo Retinal Micro Surgeries and was advised to undergo surgery to his right eye. He therefore made a request to the management and they directed the complainant to take treatment and referred him to opposite party hospital for treatment. Accordingly he approached the opposite party hospital and was admitted as in patient on 22-7-2005 and was operated on 08-8-2005 and was discharged on 12-8-2005. Subsequent to the operation, he lost his sight completely which was due to the negligent operation conducted on his right eye. Then he got i...
K.Ram Reddy Vs. M/S.Vishnuvardhan Finance and Chit Funds Pvt.Ltd.,rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-2011
1. The complainant filed this appeal questioning acquittal of A.1 and A.2 of the offence under Section 113(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short, 'the Act') recorded by the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad in S.T.C.No.9 of 1997. 2. The first respondent/A.1 is M/s.Vishnuvardhan Finance and Chit Funds (Private) Limited. The second respondent/A.2 is Director of A.1. Though several allegations under several other penal provisions are alleged in the complaint before the lower Court, the lower Court took cognizance of the case for the offence under Section 113(2) of the Act. After trial, the lower Court found A.1 and A.2 not guilty of the said offence on the grounds that there is no acceptable evidence of the complainant making total payment of Rs.50,000/- towards value of shares in A.1 company and that the complainant, not being a shareholder of A.1 company, is not entitled to institute the prosecution by filing the complaint in view of Section 621 of the Act. 3. In support ...
Shaik Moulana Saheb Vs. the State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-2011
1. This appeal is filed against the Judgement passed by the V Additional Sessions Judge, West Godavari at Eluru in S.C.No. 89 of 2006 convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo RI for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and further convicting and sentencing him to undergo RI for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- for the offence under Section 498-A IPC. 2. I have heard Dr.Satyanarayana Rao, the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. 3. In all three accused were tried by the learned Sessions Judge on the allegation of committing the offences under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC. A.1 is the husband of the deceased, A.2 is the mother of A.1 and A.3 is a relative of A.1 and A.2. During the pendency of the case, A.2 died and as such the case against A.2 was abated. The trial court acquitted A.3 while convicting and sentencing the appellant/A.1 as mentioned abov...
Dr.Vinjamuri Prabhakaram Vs. the Executive Director Customer Relations ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-04-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The respondent issued insurance policy bearing No.69843805 on 30.1.2002. The respondents addressed letter dated 10.10.2003 informing the appellant that the insurance policy was suspended w.e.f., 10.10.2003. In this regard the appellant addressed letters dated 4.11.2003 and 9.12.2003 to the respondents. The respondents returned the cheque for `11,500/- sent by the appellant on the premise of the lapse of the insurance policy. The appellant had approached the Insurance Ombudsman for ventilating his grievance. The insurance Ombudsman advised the appellant to approach the Central office of the respondent insurance corporation on the premise of lack of his jurisdiction. 2. The respondents had cited the reason for suspension of the insurance policy as the suppression of material fact by the appellant. It is contended that the investigation made by the second respondent in regard to...
M. Koteswara Rao Vs. the Senior Commandant,cisf Unit, Sdsc, Shar, Srih ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
1. This writ petition has been instituted by a Constable of the Central Industrial Security Force (henceforth referred to as 'the Security Force') questioning the legality and validity of the proceedings dated 24-09-2007, whereby the petitioner has been subjected to disciplinary enquiry by framing the following two Articles of Charge: Article-I That No.902293157 Constable M. Koteswara Rao of CISF Unit, SDSC SHAR, Sriharikota was detailed for "C" shift duty from 2100 hrs on 14.08.2007 to 0500 hrs on 15.08.2007 at Cable patrolling, but he did not report for duty and remained absent from duty, which amounts to dereliction of duty on his part. Hence, the charge. Article-II That No.844509866 Head Constable (GD) N.K. Singha of CISF Unit, SDSC SHAR, Sriharikota is residing in Govt. family quarter No.138, PHC - I, SDSC SHAR, Sriharikota along with his wife named Smt. Nupur Singha. On 13.08.2007 at about 2140 hrs, No.902293157 Constable M. Koteswara Rao came inside the boundary of q...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »