Andhra Pradesh Court July 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Sathya Diagnostic Centre Rep. by Its Managing Director and Others ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-07-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party diagnostic centre against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay a compensation of Rs. 1 lakh together with costs of Rs. 2,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that she approached the appellant diagnostic centre for health check up paid Rs. 2,500/- under registration No. 30623/2007 on 21.12.2007. Accordingly the appellant conducted certain tests besides Pap Smear test under Syndicate Bank Employees and Spouses Master Health Check-up scheme as her husband being an executive working in the bank. Though she did not get the mammography test conducted reports were issued with the said registration number however mentioning her name as Mrs. C. Praveena instead of Mrs. C. Prameela. In the test report there was a mention that she was suffering from Fibro Glandular Parenchymal Pattern seen in both breasts. This has created mental agony and that she could not belie...
Jasti Venkateswara Raoioner Vs. the Government of A.P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
1. At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition is filed for a certiorari to quash letter No.261/ATO/2009, dated 29.10.2009, of respondent No.4. 3. The petitioner is a special class contractor registered with the Roads and Buildings Department. Tenders were called for execution of the works under NABARD assisted RIAD Scheme on 18.05.2009. One such work pertains to construction of a Degree College at Seethampeta in Srikakulam District. The petitioner participated in the tender process and his tender was accepted. 4. Before the contract was executed, respondent No.4 by the impugned letter addressed to the petitioner informed the latter that verification of the authenticity of the experience certificate produced by him with the purported issuing authority, namely, Divisional Engineer-I, C.G.Housing Board, Raipur, revealed that...
M. Nagaraju Vs. Kotha Venakteswara Rao R.K. Distributors and Airtel Au ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) The complainant preferred this appeal against disallowance of some amount while allowing part of the claim. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he is a trade union leader working for the welfare of the members of his union. Op1 is a local distributor of Ops 2 and 3 authorised for distribution of AIRTEL services. To meet his personal and union activities he subscribed to BSNL from 2002 to 2005. In order to take journey to Delhi he availed the offer of free flight service when the respondents announced the same, on 31.10.2005 with a hope of getting free air ticket to New Delhi he paid Rs. 1,195/-. Op1 and Op2 sent an application along with terms and conditions informing that the last date for submission of application form was 20.11.2005, and the last date of travel was 30.4.2006. Accordingly he submitted his application to Op1 along with demand draft for Rs. 442/- as required on 30.11.2005 fixing his date of j...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd, Branch Office, Sanghamitra Bank C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.25/2008 on the file of District Forum, Nalgonda , the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant took an insurance policy for his scooter for the period from 26.3.2004 to 25.3.2005 for an amount of Rs.1 lakh and the said vehicle is insured for loss or damage of the vehicle as per the terms and conditions of the policy. On 26.6.2004 at about 8.30 p.m. the said vehicle skidded near railway tracks and the complainant sustained the following injuries: i).Mal-united comminuted Bi-Condylar and Upper 1/3rd fracture of right Tibia. ii).Commented fracture of head of right Fibula, iii).Mal-united fracture of surgical neck of right humerous, iv). Multiple injuries on all over body. Crime no.121/2004 was registered and the complainant was shifted to Sri Rama Ortho Hospital, Nalgonda where he was treated as an inpatient and the steel rods and some ot...
Ratna Raja Nursery Chinee, Lime Seedlings and Budded Plant Suppliers V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2011
Oral Order: (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.153/2004 on the file of District Forum, Mahabubnagar, opposite parties 1 and 2 preferred F.A.No.1217/2009 and the complainants preferred F.A.No.1219/2009. Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.154/2004 on the file of District Forum, Mahabubnagar, opposite parties 1 and 2 preferred F.A.No.1218/2009 and the complainant preferred F.A.No.1220/2009. Since all these appeals deal with common facts and are against common opposite parties they are being disposed of by this common order. F.A.1217/09: The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is an agriculturist and approached opposite parties 1 and 2 who are dealers in sale of Chinee, Lime seedlings and budded plants and registered as number 6 of A.P.Agricultural University for purchase of Sweet Orange plants. Opposite party no.3 is arrayed as an agent of opposite party no.1 Firm. The complainant submits that he purchased 1000 numbers of Sweet ...
National Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Sambhavi Engineers
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2011
D. Appa Rao, President: 1. This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party Insurance Company against the order of the District Forum directing it to pay Rs. 2,25,000 with interest @ 9% p.a., together with costs of Rs. 2,000. 2. The case of the complainant in brief is that it had taken an insurance policy covering the risk of Hydraulic excavator with the appellant Insurance Company covering the period from 7.7.2006 to 6.7.2007 for Rs. 43,38,650 by paying premium of Rs. 52,465. While so on 27.4.2007 it met with accident damaging cabin, mirror, etc. When the claim was made the officials of the Insurance Company visited the place and estimated at Rs. 2,25,000. Since it did not settle the claim he got issued a registered legal notice followed by complaint claiming Rs. 2,25,000 with interest @ 18% p.a., besides compensation of Rs. 50,000 towards mental agony and costs. 3. The appellant Insurance Company resisted the case. While admitting issuance of policy it alleged that for hydraulic exc...
M/S. Sangita Travels Vs. Hasmukh C. Jain
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party travel agency against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay compensation of Rs. 20,000/- besides refund of bus fare with interest together with costs of Rs. 2,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that when he intended to travel from Hyderabad to Mumbai on 24.3.2008 he enquired with the appellant travel agency and got confirmation ticket on payment of Rs. 950/- towards charges. It was scheduled to leave at 8.30 p.m. Though on appointed time he was waiting at the pick up point however the appellant kept on promising that the bus would come. However, after waiting considerable period the appellant informed that the said bus had already left and it could not be able to accommodate since it was full, and it promised that it would accommodate in a flight, and he may go to airport. Though he waited at the airport he could not get any ticket. When demanded the ap...
M/S. Murugan Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd., Vs. M/S. Ddf ( Davood Fruit Merch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2011
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.91/2008 on the file of District Forum-1 Chittoor , the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased apples from M/s. Bhagavandoss and Sons, Delhi and the apples worth Rs.26,08,907/- , 50,785 kgs. And the same were stored in the cold storage of the opposite party and the relevant receipts were issued by the opposite party. The receipts are dt.10.12.2007 to 2.1.2008. On 12.3.2008 onwards when the complainant was lifting the stock he was informed that 20 lakhs worth stock was damaged and the complainant took photographs and CD for proving the same. The complainant submits that it was only because of mis management of the opposite party that his stock was damaged and he got issued legal notice on 26.6.2008 calling upon the opposite party to compensate for the loss for which the opposite party replied on 12.6.2008 denying his liabilit...
The Secunderabad Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. Rep. by Its Senior Manag ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party bank against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to execute and register the document revoking the mortgage deed and refund his share of amount together with dividend/interest besides compensation of Rs. 20,000/- and costs of Rs. 2,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he borrowed amount by mortgaging his property by depositing title deeds and executed a memorandum to that effect on 12.1.2007. When he cleared the loan on 14.12.2009, it had returned the title deeds and issued a certificate that he cleared the amount but failed to execute registered document cancelling the mortgage, and as such he could not obtain loan from any other bank and sustained monetary loss. He got issued registered notice on 18.12.2009 however did not evoke any reply. It did not pay his share of divided amount payable to him. Therefore he filed the complaint for execution of re...
Sri Lakshmi Ganapathi Sachidananda Modern Rice Mills and Others Vs. th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) All these appeals nine in number are preferred by the proprietors of rice mills against the orders of the Dist. Forum dismissing their complaints filed against electricity corporation demanding the amounts on the basis of estimated cost. 2) Since common questions of fact as well as law arise in all these appeals, we are of the opinion that all these cases could be disposed of by a common order: 3) We narrate the facts in C.C. No. 154/2006 (F.A. 441/2009) as representative case for better appreciation. 4) The case of the complainants in brief is that they are owners of rice mills having individual service connections under category-3. They have been running these mills by utilizing electricity supply on payment of electricity charges without any default. Their mills are situated in the same area. While so electricity corporation introduced a new scheme under the name and style of 24 hour un-interrupted power supply wherein t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »