Andhra Pradesh Court July 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sai Kommoju Durga Prasada Rao and Another. Vs. Patnala Babu Rao and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
1. Defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.860 of 2003 on the file of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, are the appellants. They feel aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court on 24.04.2006, and filed this appeal. The 1st respondent-plaintiff filed the suit for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit schedule property, R.C.C. Terraced House bearing Door No.46-15-12 of Devangula Street, Dondaparthy, Visakhapatnam. He has also claimed arrears of rent to an extent of Rs.1,44,000/- from the respondents. 2. The brief averments in the plaint are to the effect that, late Patnala Lakshmayya, had three sons, by name, Varahalu, Satyanarayana and Suryanarayana @ Suribabu. The plaintiff is the son of Varahalu. On the death of his first wife, Lakshmayya married another woman, by name Akkayyamma, who is none other than the sister of his first wife. Through his second wife, Lakshmayya had a son by name Chinnayachari and two daughters - Ratna...
K. Satyanarayana Vs. Kanchiraju Raja Ram and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The two appeals arise from the orders of the District Forum which were passed in the same circumstances and as such they are proposed to be disposed of by a common order. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to, as they have been referred in the complaint. 2. The complainant purchased semi furnished flats bearing Nos.M6 and A5 in Maruti Residence from the opposite party no.2. The opposite party no.2 executed sale deeds bearing document Nos.6375 of 2006 and 7938 of 2006 28.9.2006 and 23.11.2006 respectively in respect of the flat nos. M6 and A5 in favour of the complainant. The complainant had sought for relief of possession of the flats. 3. The complainant contends that the opposite party no.2 informed him that he had entered into an agreement of sale with the opposite partyno.1 and delivered the flats to the opposite party no.1 and on the complainant insisting for possession of the flats, the opposite par...
Khiwasara Finance and Leasing Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sri K ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
Oral Order :(per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in .C.C.No.936/07 on the file of District Forum-1, Hyderabad , the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner and driver of seven seater autorickshaw bearing no.AP-9 W. The complainant purchased the autorickshaw in his own name for a total sale consideration of Rs.1,68,000/- consisting of Rs.1,30,000/- out of his own funds and the balance amount of Rs.38,000/- by borrowings by way of loan under loan agreement dt.14-11-2003 from the opposite party who is a financier/money lender repayable in equal monthly instalments @ Rs.3,150/- each. The complainant ever since the inception had been regular in paying instalments without committing any single default. On 6.10.2004 the opposite party without issuing Prior Demand Notice trespassed in to the dwelling house belonging to the complainant and took away the Seven Seater Autorickshaw with the help o...
G. Sreenivasulu Reddy Vs. the Manager Ing Vysya Bank Ltd. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Appellant is unsuccessful complainant. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he issued two post dated cheques for Rs. 2,466/- each dt. 7.3.2004 and 7.4.2004 drawn on Pinanaki Grameena Bank, Nellore in favour of Ashok Layland Finance Ltd. which intimated that the cheques have been dishonoured with an endorsement insufficient funds , and insisted for payment of amount of Rs. 4,930/- covered under the cheques in order to avoid seizure of the vehicle. This is on account of Op1 ING Vysya bank sending the cheques to Op2 Union Bank of India instead of sending the same to Pinanakini Grameena Bank, Nellore, and due to which he was made to pay the entire amount. It caused mental agony and loss of reputation. Though he sent notice through courier on 30.5.2005 the respondents did not respond. Therefore he claimed Rs. 50,000/- towards damages and Rs. 2,000/- towards costs. 3) Op1 ING Vysya bank resisted the case. It alleged th...
Smt. Rapeti Aruna Vs. the Royal Sundaram Alliance Company Limited, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
Oral Order :(Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.208/2007 on the file of District Forum-II, Visakhapatnam, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants husband Adi Venkata Satyanarayana during his life time took a Personal Accident Insurance Policy for an amount of Rs.5 lakhs from the opposite party vide policy no.00001898-000100 valid from 13.4.04 to 12.4.2005. The complainants husband accidentally fell from steps on 24.5.2004 at about 6 p.m. at his house at Thummapala, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam Dist. and he was immediately shifted to King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam for treatment where he died at about 9.30 p.m. on the same day. Death of the deceased was informed to the Anakapalli Town Police Station on 25.5.2004 and post mortem was conducted at KGH on the same day. Subsequently the complainant came to know about the existence of the policy in the month of December,2005. The comp...
Sri Kota Venkata Sarma Vs. Dr. P. Vasu Dev and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member 1. The complainant has filed the appeal against the order of dismissal of his complaint. 2. The Complainant approached the Visakha Eye Hospital on 7.3.2000 for checkup of his Left Eye and after thorough examination, on 15.03.2000 the Opposite Parties conducted an operation for his Left Eye. Subsequently, the Complainant has been taking treatment for his Left Eye under their control, by paying the fees as directed by the Opposite Parties. Subsequently, after few visits to the opposite parties as the complainant suffered with pain in his operated eye, the complainant on 3.5.2000 visited the opposite parties who after examination advised to visit them in the month of August 2000. After several visits the opposite parties informed the complainant that he lost vision in his left eye and advised him to continue the same medicine as prescribed earlier. The complainant consulted the opposite parties in the month of February 2006 whereon he was informed...
Koncha Hanuma Reddy Vs. Koppuravari Satyanarayana
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
1. The appellant filed O.S.No.127 of 2006 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Darsi against the respondent, for recovery of amount, on the basis of a promissory note, dated 10.10.1996. He pleaded that the respondent borrowed a sum of Rs.25,900/- from Peram Venkata Anil Kumar Reddy, a minor and his father by name Konda Reddy. The promissory note is said to have been transferred in favour of the appellant on 10.12.1996. Alleging that in spite of repeated demands, the respondent did not repay the amount, the appellant filed the suit for recovery. 2. The respondent filed a written statement opposing the suit. He pleaded that the promissory note was executed as a measure of renewal of an earlier transaction of the year 1994 and that substantial part of it was discharged towards his lenders. He further pleaded that the transfer of the promissory note in favour of the appellant is defective in law. 3. The trial Court decreed the suit through judgment, dated 08.10.2007. Aggrieved thereby, the ...
M/S.Svpcl Limited Vs. Securities Exchange Board of India Rep.by Its Ch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2011
1. W.P.No.27354 of 2008 is filed by M/s.SVPCL Limited and W.P.No.8471 of 2009 by its Directors for a mandamus to set aside notice in proceedings No.CFD/DIL/NB/NB/SCN/146318/2008, dated 02.12.2008, of respondent No.1. They sought for a consequential direction to the respondents to desist from taking any coercive steps in pursuance of the impugned notice. 2. Since the issues raised in both these writ petitions are identical, they are heard and are being disposed of by this common order. For convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in W.P.No.27354 of 2008. The petitioner is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Companies Act'). Its authorised share capital is Rs.27.50 crore. Intending to raise its capital for expansion of its business operations, its Board of Directors passed a resolution on 23.02.2007 to raise capital by inviting subscriptions of 76,66,668 equity shares from the public by way of 100% voluntary book buil...
Sri Chennakesava Swamy Temple. Vs. Ravi Veeraiah Chowdary.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2011
1. The appellant - Devasthanam owns agricultural land at Kumakalamarru Village of Parchuru Mandal, Prakasam District. The leasehold rights of the land are auctioned from time to time for augmenting its resources. The respondent emerged as the successful bidder for a period of three years from 2006-09, at a sum of Rs.94,500/- per year. He deposited the amount for the year 2006-07 (for short 'first year') and raised the paddy crop. Thereafter, he raised the crop for the subsequent year 2007-08 (for short 'second year') without depositing the amount. On the ground that he committed default in payment of rent, the leasehold rights for the year 2008-09, were granted in favour of another person. 2. The appellant filed O.S.No.9 of 2008 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Parchur, for recovery of the rent, for the second year. It was pleaded that though the respondent raised the crop, on the land, he did not pay the rent, that was offered by him, in the auction. 3. The respondent filed a writt...
Mohd. Ismail Khadari Vs. the Chief Medical Superintendent Railway Hosp ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-18-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Appellant is unsuccessful complainant. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he is a retired railway employee having attained superannuation on 30.6.2002. A scheme was evolved for retired employees to have benefit of medical treatment on par with working employees. In fact it was re-opened from 28.1.2005 to 31.12.2005. In view of the fact that he was entitled to the benefits under the scheme he paid his contribution. He and his wife are hypertension patients undergoing treatment/regular check up with their family doctor Dr. S. Venkata Prasad, Former Head and Professor of Medicine, registered civil surgeon, Government General Hospital, Kakinada. Despite his repeated requests to the Medical Superintendent, health Unit, Samalkot and Chief Medical Superintendent, Railway Hospital, Vijayawada to supply medicines they refused. In fact they were empowered to purchase medicines in the local market. When they could not sup...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »