Andhra Pradesh Court July 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sri Y. Satyanarayana and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2011
1. This Appeal is filed against the order dated 23-10-2008 passed in W.C.No.111 of 2007 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I, Sri T. Anjaiah Karmika Samkshema Bhavan, RTC Cross Roads at Hyderabad. The appellant herein is the Opposite party No.2/Insurance Company in the said W.C. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the learned Commissioner. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was employed by the opposite party No.1 as a driver for his auto bearing No.AP 24V 1202. On 02-09- 2004 while the applicant was proceeding as the driver on the said auto from Mall to Chinthapalli with passengers, and at about 13-00 hours, when he reached the outskirts of Kurmede village at K.M. Stone No.66/4, he lost control over the said auto as a result of which the auto fell in a ditch and the applicant sustained grievous injuries and multiple fractures all over the body. Immediately he was shifted t...
Parchuri Sivaram Prasad Vs. Smt. Balatripura Sundari
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2011
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the defendant against the order dated 21-4-2011 in IA.No. 515 of 2011 in I.A.No. 34 of 2011 in OS.No. 11 of 2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Bhodan, Nizamabad district, allowing the application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to grant police-aid by way of directing the Station House Officer, Bhodan [R] Police Station to protect the possession of the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner and Sri T. Sujan Kumar, the learned counsel representing the respondent. 3. The Revision Petitioner is the brother of the respondent. She filed OS.No. 11 of 2011 for declaration of the title and perpetual injunction in respect of suit schedule land bearing survey No.207/AA and survey No. 210/E/1 admeasuring to an extent of Ac:3-24 gts and 0-27 gts., respectively, total extent Ac:3-11 guntas situated at Pentakurd villasge of Bodhan Mandal...
M/S. San Enterprises, Reptd. by Its Partner (Alleged Partner) Dr.K.Mad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-29-2011
Oral Order :(Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) F.A.No.920/09 : Aggrieved by the order in C.C.306/06 on the file of District Forum-II,Visakhapatnam, the opposite party no.1 preferred F.A.No.920/09. Since all these appeals F.A.Nos.920/09 to 926/09 and F.A.No.1179/08 refer to common facts they are being disposed of by this common order. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant paid an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 10.12.03 by cash towards advance payment to the opposite parties for a two bed room flat in the first floor. On 22.2.2004 the Managing Partner of SAN Enterprises died and thereafter the legal heirs of late M.S.Reddy issued a paper notification in Eanadu dt.25.3.04 stating that they are the legal heirs of late M.S.Reddy and the complainant informed the legal heirs about the advance payment and she was assured that the venture would be completed. As there was no progress till the date of filing of the complaint i.e. for a period of 2 years the complainant a...
The Post Master Afzalgunj Post Office Hyderabad and Another Vs. V.K. S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-29-2011
R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. They have filed the appeal challenging the order of the District Forum which awarded a sum of `1,000/- as compensation and `500/- towards costs besides issuing direction for refund of `25/- to the complainant. 2. The respondent had sent a letter through registered post through the first appellant to the Asst. Engineer opposite party APCPDCL, Mamidipally, R.R.District on 22.4.2008 and the letter was returned with the endorsement no such addressee. Returned to Sender. 3. It is contended by the respondent that the appellants have been negligent and the postman had endorsed that he visited the premises on Sunday and on other dates, 23.04.2008, 26.04.2008, 28.04.2008, 29.4.2008 etc., as also the appellants had not verified the dates endorsed by the postman. 4. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that the letter was sent to Pahadi Shariff Branch Post office as t...
Pradeep Kumar Singh Vs. the Union of India and 2 Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2011
1 This Writ Appeal is filed against the order of dismissal dated 14.09.2005 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in W.P.No.18454 of 2002 in which the appellant, being the appellant in the said Writ Petition 18454 of 2002, challenged the order of the third respondent dated 14.05.1999 in GX No.1595/1999 imposing rigorous imprisonment for 90 days and dismissal from service and deprivation of Good Conduct Badge. 2 The facts, in brief, are that the appellant was appointed as Mechanical Engineer - I in Naval Service in the year 1995 and that he was on duty at Volna Tower on Dolphins Nose Hill at Visakhapatnam from April 1998. On 29.12.1998 at about 6.00 PM he went to O.P Pandey's quarters informing his college Mr.H.Singh to collect uniform items to get ready for Muster Call on 31.12.1999 and after collection of the uniform, the appellant could not reach the Volna Tower and so, he informed the said Mr.Singh on telephone that he could not come there as he had to give urine and blood ...
M/S. Ushasri Chit Funds (P) Ltd., Vs. Smt. Karnati Shama Swarupa
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-28-2011
Oral Order : (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved By the order in C.C.No.83/04 on the file of Dist.Forum, Khammam, opp.party preferred F.A.429/09 and aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.84/04 the same opposite party preferred F.A.No.430/09. Since both these appeals relate to similar facts against the same opposite party they are being disposed of by this common order F.A.429/09: The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant joined in opp.party chit group for Rs.50,000/- and paid her monthly subscriptions through her father who died on 15.8.2001. Thereafter she paid the chit instalments through her brother one Mr.Sarath Krishna till the maturity period of the chit. The complainant did not auction the chit and all the vouchers pertaining to the chit transaction are in the custody of her brother. Thereafter disputes arose between the complainant and her brother and she requested the opposite party to pay the total chit amount and even issued a legal notice on...
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-28-2011
Oral Order :(Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.158/2005 on the file of District Forum, Nellore, opposite parties 2 and 3 preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the first complainant is the wife and the second and third complainants are the daughters of late Sekhar Raju who is working as driver of lorry bearing registration no.AP26,WO9 and died in a motor accident on 4.7.2003. Owner of the said lorry insured the said vehicle with opposite parties 2 and 3 company vide policy No. VC 00008291000100 dt.27.2.2003. The policy covers the risk not only of the insured vehicle but also of its driver at the relevant point of time and the liability with regard to the death of the driver is Rs.5 lakhs. On 4.7.2003 while the deceased Sekhar Raju was driving the said vehicle at Sachendi of Kanpur, at about 1 a.m. an unknown truck driver in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the lorry as a result of which the driver died. Th...
Smt Suma Reddy Vs. M/S Carpenters Classics India (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-28-2011
R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member 1. The complainant has filed the appeal against the order of dismissal of her complaint. 2. The appellant engaged the services of the opposite party who are in the business of selling and installing Modular Kitchens. On 1.7.2007 she placed an order with the opposite party for Vesta brand Modular Kitchen by paying an advance amount of `5,000/-. The opposite party submitted quotations for installation of two kitchens in two houses of the complainant. They had undertaken to supply Start-Rovera Moro/Bianco Model/Finish with the carcass of Matt White with all other specifications in respect of the product supplied and the second house model/finish was to be Ginger Prugna/Grigio Corda, Ciligeo carcass along with other specifications. The final price was fixed at a sum of `5,15,000/- for both modular kitchens. Accordingly the complainant paid a further sum of `3 lakh on 17.7.2007. The work was to be completed within a period of 100 to 120 days. On 19.7.2007 the o...
The United India Insurance Company Limited and Another Vs. Smt. Naduku ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-27-2011
Oral Order :(per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.24 of 2007 on the file of Dist Forum, Nizamabad , opposite parties 2 and 3 preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the first complainant is the wife and second complainant is the son of late Nadukuda Linganna who was a member of opposite party no.1 Society, which through opposite parties 2 and 3 Insurance Company covered all the members for Rs.1 lakh insurance coverage. The complainant submits that an amount of Rs.60/- towards insurance premium was deducted from the life assured vide receipt no.447970 dt.16.2.2006 . On 22.9.2006 the life assured died accidentally due to snake bite and FIR no.157/06 was issued and through the first opposite party the complainants informed the insurance company and the Bank and made a claim for Rs.1 lakh. When there was no response from the opposite parties the complainants got issued a legal notice on 16.3.2007 and thereafter filed this co...
The Branch Manager National Insurnace Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Sye ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-26-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it pay Rs. 6 lakhs covered under the policy with interest @ 9% p.a., from the date of complaint till the date of realization together with compensation of Rs. 10,000/- towards mental agony and Rs. 1,000/- towards costs. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that his wife Smt. Arifunnissa Begum a government teacher had taken personal accident policy with the appellant for a sum of Rs. 6 lakhs covering the period from 14.7.2000 to 13.7.2001. While so, she unfortunately met with accident on 6.8.2000 when a tempo dashed her while she was crossing the road at Annaram village and was admitted in Osmania General Hospital, and the police registered it as a case in Crime No. 83/2000 u/s 337 of IPC. Later on false information of the family members the police altered it from Section 304A to 302, 201 IPC, and a case was r...