Andhra Pradesh Court April 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. Rep. by Its Authorised Representative Ki ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-07-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) The opposite parties Airlines preferred the appeal against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to refund flight charges of Rs. 4,178/- besides compensation of Rs. 5,000/- and costs of Rs. 2,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he has purchased two flight tickets for their return journey from Delhi to Hyderabad on 1.11.2005 at 19.00 hours by R2 aircraft at Hyderabad airport by paying Rs. 4,177.90 ps. When he along with his friend went to Delhi Airport at 17.00 hours on 1.11.2005 he was informed that the appellants had rescheduled the flight departure to 15.50 horus and that SMS message was sent to his mobile phone on previous day. However he did not receive any SMS or e-mail. Therefore he was constrained to purchase two tickets on Indian Airlines by spending Rs. 13,200/- in view of impending Diwali festival to reach Hyderabad. Alleging that this constitutes deficiency in service and negligence filed the c...
The Principal Secretary Dept. of Environment Forests and Others Vs. th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-06-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties representing the Principal Secretary, Department of Environment, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Dist. Collector, the Divisional Forest Officer against the order of the Dist. Forum directing to accord permission for felling the red sander tree and pay Rs. 25,000/- towards compensation and also Rs. 2,000/- towards costs. 2) The case of the complainant Consumer Guidance Society representing on behalf of one Alla Koteswara Rao filed this complaint alleging that he had planted red sander tree and also one teak tree within the premises of his house bearing No. 10-193. They attained the age of 30 years and 20 years respectively . As there was heavy gale and rain the red sander tree has become suspended from its roots and fell on his house. Equally so with teak tree. The branches have been not only falling on the neighbouring houses but also on electrical poles causing da...
Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vs Chagarlamudi Nageswara Rao and On ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2011
1.Both appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 15-07-2002 in O.S.Nos.559 of 1994 and 78 of 2001 passed by the Principal A.S.No.1471 of 2002 was filed against the judgment in O.S.No.559 of 1994 and A.S.No.1472 of 2002 was filed against the judgme The brief facts of the case are as under:- Suit O.S.No.559 1994 was filed for sale proceedings held by the defendant is null and void and for possession of the suit sc The allegations in the plaint goes to show that the father of the plaintiff has inherited the land in Sy.No.141/B and in the The Collector fixed the market value @ 22/- per square yard and the defendant requested the plaintiff and others to give cons Meanwhile, the plaintiff requested the defendant when the site is not public purpose, the site may be deleted from the master The plaintiff planned to construct apartments in the suit schedule property and the plaintiff was surprised to know that the The defendant has filed a written statement contending that the suit is bad f...
A.Sreenivasa Rao and Others. Vs the State of A.P. Rep.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2011
1. There is no representation for the 2nd respondent-wife. The petitioners are Accused Nos.1 to 5 in D.V.A.No.18 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The 1st accused is/was the husband of the 2nd respondent. Alleging that A-1 to A-5 committed matrimonial offences, the 2nd respondent/wife laid D.V.A.No.18 of 2007. 2.As there is prior litigation between the parties, the 2nd respondent laid M.C.No.175 of 2003 seeking for maintenance from the 1st petitioner herein. She was indeed successful in obtaining an order from the Court granting maintenance in her favour. It would appear that the order has become final.3.While so, the 2nd respondent laid C.C.No.226 of 2003 on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), Hyderabad. She made allegations against the petitioner herein in C.C.No.226 of 2003 under Section 498-A and other matrimonial offences. The case had ended in acquittal. The judgment was pronounced on 30.4...
A.Sreenivasa Rao and Others Vs. the State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2011
1. There is no representation for the 2nd respondent-wife. The petitionersare Accused Nos.1 to 5 in D.V.A.No.18 of 2007 on the file of the III AdditionalChief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The 1st accused is/was the husband ofthe 2nd respondent. Alleging that A-1 to A-5 committed matrimonial offences,the 2nd respondent/wife laid D.V.A.No.18 of 2007.2. As there is prior litigation between the parties, the 2nd respondent laidM.C.No.175 of 2003 seeking for maintenance from the 1st petitioner herein. Shewas indeed successful in obtaining an order from the Court granting maintenancein her favour. It would appear that the order has become final.3. While so, the 2nd respondent laid C.C.No.226 of 2003 on the file of theXIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), Hyderabad. Shemade allegations against the petitioner herein in C.C.No.226 of 2003 underSection 498-A and other matrimonial offences. The case had ended in acquittal.The...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›