Andhra Pradesh Court March 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ponnapalli Rama Krishna Vs. the Superintending Engineer Operations) Ap ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-16-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Appellant is unsuccessful complainant. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that his father is the owner of house bearing No. 6D-6-18 for which he has taken service connection No. 1113-5491. On his death he succeeded to the said property. The average consumption was 15 16 units for the last several years. The minimum bill was around Rs. 66/-. The following are the previous readings.S.No.Bill DatePreviousPresentNo. of UnitsRs.ReadingReadingConsumed109/04/2007295829731566209/05/2007297329861366309/06/2007298630001466409/07/2007300030161666509/08/2007301630372166609/09/2007303730612466709/10/2007306130771666While so on 13.10.2007 the respondent electricity board installed a new meter bearing No. 733998 single phase two wire A/c static energy meter manufactured in April, 2007 by United Electrical Industries Ltd. Kollam, Kerala with the following technical specifications: Basic voltage (rms) 240 Basic current (rm...
The Manager Icici Bank Ltd. M.G.Road, Vijayawada Vs. Ravi Jewellery Co ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-16-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party bank against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 32,278/- together with compensation and costs of Rs. 2,000/- each. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he is doing business under the name and style of Raj Jewellery Company. He has an account in the appellant bank. It has agreed to accept all the credit cards of customers agreeing to give a commission of 2% on all credit card sales. While so on 10.12.2006 at 16.16 hours two persons residents of Singapore holding credit cards purchased gold worth Rs. 32,278/- and Rs. 31,836/- respectively by using their credit cards. It has used the scratch machine supplied by the bank which has accepted the two credit cards. As per the verification of the bank one of the credit cards standing in the name of James Sagar was fake. In fact the complainant sent the statement showing an amount of Rs. 15,000 + Rs. 36,800/- ...
The United India Insurance Co.Ltd, Rep. by Itâs Sr. Divisional Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-16-2011
Oral Order: Smt. M. Shreesha, Member: 1. Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.80/2009 on the file of District Forum ,Kadapa , opp.parties 1 and 2 preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants father during his life time obtained an insurance policy cum certificate cum receipt under tailor made Personal Accident Scheme for Engineering students and parents and to that effect a certificate dt.31.8.2006 was issued at Kadapa with policy no.10865/2006 commencing from 2006-2007 with expiry clause upto 2009-2010 or commencement of final year examination for the batch which ever is earlier. Under the certificate of policy in the event of accidental death of parent/guardian an amount of Rs.3 lakhs is to be paid to the nominee + Tuition fees upto Rs.25,000/- + Boarding charges upto Rs.25,000/- p.a. for the balance period of study. The said facility can be availed by the complainant in the event of death of parent. The third opp.party is the General Manag...
Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd. Vs. M/S. Ibm Global Services ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2011
:ORDER: 1. This application is filed under Section 11 (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Act') for appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes arising out of an agreement dated 16.06.1999.2. The applicant is A.P. Beverages Corporation Limited. It is not in dispute that the applicant and the respondent company entered into an agreement dated 16.6.1999 whereunder the applicant agreed to acquire and the respondent agreed to furnish product and service for the MFG/PRO Depot Management System for system integration in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated thereunder.3. Alleging that in spite of several reminders by the applicant, the respondent failed to get the software programmes functioned in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed upon, the applicant issued a termination notice dated 3.1.2003 in terms of Article 8 of the agreement and called upon the respondent to refund a sum of Rs.43 Lakhs within 30 days. The respond...
Vavilapalli Ramesh,s/O.Satyanarayana and anr. Vs. Giradarama Rao, S/O. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2011
:ORDER: 1. This criminal petition is filed by A2 and A3 questioning judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, dated 22.06.2009 passed in C.R.P.No.36 of 2007. 2. Originally the State represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Santhakaviti Police Station of Srikakulam District filed CC.No.212 of 2004 against A1 to A5 alleging offences under Sections 325, 324,323/34 I.P.C. in the Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Cass, Rajam. The said Magistrate by judgment dated 19.02.2007 found A1 to A5 not guilty of the said offences and acquitted them after full trial. As against the said acquittal, the de facto complainant/1st respondent herein filed C.R.P.No.36 of 2007 in the Sessions Court, Srikakulam under Section 397 Cr.P.C. The Additional Sessions Judge, Srikakulam by the impugned judgment in CR.P.No.36 of 2007 passed the following: " In view of my findings on Points 1 and 2 above, I set aside the judgment of the trial Court partly so far it relates to the acquittal of the ...
Madhucon Projects Limited Vs. Ue Development India Pvt Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2011
O R D E R : 1. This application is filed for appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11(5) & (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act') for resolving the disputes between the parties under Joint Venture Agreement dated 29.08.2002.2. The applicant company claims to have been carrying on business in execution of Infrastructure and Major Civil Projects, execution of Roads, Highways/Bridges etc., The respondent is also a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies Act and it has been engaged in execution of infrastructure projects.3. The applicant and the respondent herein formed a joint venture referred to as Madhucon-UEDI Joint Venture under the Agreement, dated 29.08.2002 to execute a portion of the works for strengthening of the existing two lanes from KM 300/0 to KM 359/20 and the widening thereof to four lane dual carriage way of NH 5. It is not in dispute that the four lane strengthening and widening work was entrusted to National H...
Sannidhi Satyanarayana Murthy and 7 Others Vs. Smt. Bangaru Rajeshwari
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2011
:ORDER: 1. This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 4.11.2009 in I.A.No.1469 of 2009 in O.S.No.191 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram.2. The defendants in the suit are the Revision petitioners.3. The facts, in brief, are as under:4. The respondent herein filed O.S.No.191 of 2002 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram against Sannidi Satyanarayana Murthy for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,62,233/- on the basis of a promissory note dated 30.04.2000.5. The sole defendant - Sannidi Satyanarayana Murthy filed a written statement contending that he never executed the alleged promissory note dated 30.04.2000 nor received the amount as claimed by the plaintiff. It is further pleaded that about 10 to 12 years back he had borrowed some amount from the plaintiff and in that context the plaintiff obtained the signatures of the defendant on some blank printed forms of promissory notes. Subsequently though the defendant repaid the entire a...
Defence Estates Officer, A.P. Circle Vs. N.Rani Bai and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2011
:Judgment:1. This writ appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30-4-2009 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.6522 of 2008, whereby the learned single Judge set aside the impugned order dated 06-02- 2007 in Case No.F1/7/2005 passed by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy district i.e., the 2nd respondent and remanded the matter to the 2nd respondent with certain directions. 2. Brief facts leading to this writ appeal are as follows:One Narsinga Rao was the inamdar of Ac.50-00 of land in old Survey No.279 of Alwal village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Late Namasivayam, father of the petitioners, was the permanent tenant in respect of the lands of an extent of Ac.49-39 gts., pursuant to a perpetual lease granted in his favour on 27th Dai 1320 Fasli (corresponding year 1910) by late Narsinga Rao, inamdar. The petitioners' father Namasivayam died in the year 1938. After his death, Smt. Kannamma, wife of Namasivayam, was in possession and...
Bomma Chakravarthy Goud Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2011
:ORDER: 1. The unfortunate accused was convicted for the offence under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) by the learned IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The accused was charge sheeted and was charged for the offence u/s. 468 and 420 IPC. The prosecution examined 4 witnesses. Exs.P.1 to P.8 were marked by the prosecution. The learned trial Judge found the accused not guilty of the offence u/s.468 IPC, but convicted the accused for the offence u/s.417 IPC. Simple imprisonment for one year was recorded against the sole accused. Aggrieved by the same, the accused preferred an appeal in Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2005 before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction and sentence. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision is laid. 2. The accused was involved in Crime No.136 of 1989 of Amberpet Police Station, Hyderabad for the offences u/s.384 and 420 IPC. It ultimately was numbere...
Thota Saidaiah and Another Vs. the Commissioner of Appeals and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-10-2011
:Oral order:1. In this application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek a writ in the nature of Certiorari by calling the records connected with the order of the Commissioner, Survey Settlements and Land Records-1st respondent passed in review petition No.L1/588/2000, dated 22-01-2003 and quash the same. 2. The petitioners claim to be the tenants of Freehold land to an extent of Ac.2.68 situated in Kannaigudem village under a Sanad, which was granted in the name of Kanakapalli Janardhana Rao in the year 1869 by the Secretary of the State for India in Council in consideration of payment of money, free of land revenue for ever. The said lands are heritable and transferable. The village is either part of an Estate or Ryotwari village. The Government of Andhra Pradesh in Memo No.392/J2/79 dt.10-07-1981 issued orders applying the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Areas Ryotwari Settlement) Regulation, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'A.P. Regulation I...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »