Andhra Pradesh Court March 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri M. Narayan Reddy Vs. the Govt. of India
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
:: 1. The petitioner is a Practicing Advocate, a former Member of Parliament and A.P. Legislative Assembly. He has also held positions in the Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad District, and was associated with the Agro Industries in different capacities. He filed this writ petition with a prayer to declare that the action of the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs (for short 'the respondent'), in withholding a note on Chapter-VIII (Law and Order and Internal Security Dimensions) (for short 'the note') of the report of the Committee for Consultation on the situation in Andhra Pradesh, headed by Sri Justice Srikrishna (hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee'); as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional. Consequential direction to the respondent to furnish the same to him, or to place it on the website of the respondent, is also sought. 2. The averments, in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, in brief, are that, the State of Andhra Pradesh was formed by merg...
Sri M. Narayan Reddy. Vs. the Govt. of India, and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
1. The petitioner is a Practicing Advocate, a former Member of Parliament and A.P. Legislative Assembly. He has also held positions in the Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad District, and was associated with the Agro Industries in different capacities. He filed this writ petition with a prayer to declare that the action of the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs (for short 'the respondent'), in withholding a note on Chapter-VIII (Law and Order and Internal Security Dimensions) (for short 'the note') of the report of the Committee for Consultation on the situation in Andhra Pradesh, headed by Sri Justice Srikrishna (hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee'); as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional. Consequential direction to the respondent to furnish the same to him, or to place it on the website of the respondent, is also sought. 2. The averments, in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, in brief, are that, the State of Andhra Pradesh was formed by merging...
N.Ranga Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh,rep.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
1)The present Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "Cr.P.C.") to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.122 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. It is urged by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the present petitioner is accused No.2 in S.C.No.122 of 2008. It is further urged that A-2 is working as ASI of Police in West Godavari District and the present complaint is motivated as the petitioner registered different crimes against the respondent No.2 and he submitted that the details of the crimes registered against respondent No.2, which reads as follows: 1. Crime No.137 of 2001 u/s 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 498-A of IPC registered by the petitioner herein. 2. Crime No.24 of 2002 u/s 323, 506(2) R/w Section 34 of IPC registered by the petitioner herein. 3. Crime No.1 of 2002 u/s 420 IPC registered by the Sub-Inspector of Chebrolu Polic...
Gali Suvarna and Three ors.Vs Vadla Raghuram and Four ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
1.This revision is preferred under Section 28 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') questioning the order of the learned Joint Collector - II, Ranga Reddy District dismissing the petitioner's appeal being File No.F1/4364 of 2005 dated 20.09.2005, preferred under Section 24 of the Act, as time barred.2.The facts, in brief, are as follows: The land admeasuring Ac.0.19 guntas situated in Sy.No.70, Ghanapur village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was an inam land where late Vadla Kistaiah was recorded as original pattadar/inamdar as on 01.11.1973. The petitioners 2 to 4.and the third respondent are the legal representatives of the said Vadla Kistaiah and all of them together said to have sold the schedule property to the first petitioner. It is alleged that the first respondent, grand son of Vadla Kistaiah, approached the primary tribunal under the Act i.e. Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District and obtained an occupancy c...
K.Sajjan Raj Vs Gopisetty Chandramouli
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
1.This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2008passed in A.S. No.149 of 2006 by the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.07.2006 passed in O.S. No. 770 of 2004 on the file of the I Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. 2.The appellant herein is the defendant in the original suit. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court for the sake of convenience. The plaintiff is the owner of the building in which the suit schedule Mulgi is situated. The father of the defendant was inducted as tenant in the suit schedule premises in the year 1952. After his demise, the defendant became a tenant. Initially, the monthly rent was at Rs.500/-, but subsequently the same was enhanced to Rs.1100/- per month, exclusive of electricity consumption charges, from December 2001. The tenancy is month to month commencing from first of the month to end of the month a...
Meena Vs. Dr.Shylaja Occ: Doctor
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The appellant working as a teacher in St. Joseph School had approached the respondent for abortion in view of their decision to have one child who was 13 months old and for the reason that she had undergone caesarean section at the time of delivery of her son as also she had acted upon the advice of the respondent. On 5.12.2005 as per the advice of the respondent, the appellant had got conducted urine test at Balaji Diagnostic centre which issued report with the result for pregnancy as positive and on 6.12.2005 the respondent had admitted the appellant in her hospital and conducted abortion to terminate the pregnancy of the appellant. 2. The appellant has charged the respondent with negligent treatment administered to her and stated that after the termination of pregnancy, on 22.12.2005 she has suffered from bleeding which was reported to the respondent who assured her that it would subside within two or three days which ...
The Chairman, Anwar-ul-uloom College of Engineering and Technology, Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-23-2011
Oral Order ( per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President.) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party against the order of the District Forum directing it to refund Rs.35,000/- paid towards fee with interest at 9% p.a. from 05-11-2007 till the date of realization together with compensation of Rs.5,000/- and costs of Rs.2,000/-. The case of the complainant in brief is that he joined in B.Tech (ECE) in appellant college at Malakpet under Management quota and paid Rs.35,000/- towards first year fee for which the appellant had issued a receipt. When he went to join at Malakpet, he was informed that he was allotted seat at the college situated at Vikarabad and advised him to join at that place. He refused to join at Vikarabad as he was under an impression that the college is situated at Malakpet and requested for refund of fee and certificates, which was refused. Therefore, he filed the complaint claiming return of SSC Memo and T.C., besides refund Rs.35,000/- paid, Rs.60,000/- towa...
Rajalakshmi Jewellers Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-22-2011
Oral Order ( As per Sri R.Laksminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. This complaint is filed u/s 17(1)(A) of C.P. Act seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay a sum of `35,12,728/- towards balance of claim with interest @ 14% per annum and `20 lakh towards damages for mental agony and trauma and for future interest from the date of filing of the complaint.2. Briefly stated the averments of the complaint are that the complainant, a partnership firm engaged in the business of purchase and sale of jewellarly, diamonds, gold ornaments at Hyderabad obtained Jewelers Block Insurance Policy from the opposite party no.2 for the period from 4-02-2003 to 3-02-2004 for the sum assured of Rs.1,63,90,000/-.On 26-12-2003 at about 9.10 p.m dacoity was committed in the shop of the complainant firm and on complaint , the Police, Abids registered a case in crime no.577 of 2003 and transferred it to Central Crime Station. On claim being lodged by the complainant firm, the opposite parties appointed surveyor...
M. Narayana Vs. the Divisional Manager New India Assurance Company Ltd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-22-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Appellant is unsuccessful complainant. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he had taken Group Janata Personal Accident Policy (JPA) from R1 insurance company through its agent Kurnool District Motor Workers Union R2 for a sum of Rs. 1 lakh covering the period from 16.4.2001 to 15.4.2006. His name was mentioned at S.No. 34 in the policy. While so on 16.3.2003 while he was driving the lorry at Machavaram village accident took place resulting in grievous injuries on his person. The said fact was intimated to the police which in turn registered as a case in Crime No. 30/2003 u/s 337 IPC. R2 informed the said fact to R1. He was shifted to Govt. Hospital, Mahaboobnagar and there after to Govt. Hospital, Kurnool where his right leg up to knee was amputated resulting permanent disability. He also suffered fracture to his right leg and hand. He took treatment in the Govt. Hospital for four months as an in-patient and was dis...
Moocherla Subba Rao Vs. the Divisional Engineer Operation, Apspdcl and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-21-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. He had obtained service connection No.SC3219 to his house at Chirala. The second respondent inspected the service connection on 27.4.2007 . The second respondent affixed notice to the house of the appellant showing that at the time of his inspection, tiffin business was being conducted in the morning hours at the house of the appellant and he had disconnected the service connection on the premise that the domestic service connection was utilized for non-domestic purpose. The second respondent registered a case against the appellant and provisionally estimated the value of the energy stated to have been misused by the appellant, at Rs.1,893/-. The power to the service connection of the appellant was disconnected on 9.7.2007. 2. The respondent had not chosen to contest the case and was set exparte. 3. The appellant has filed his affidavit and the documents Exs.A1 and A2. 4. The District For...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »