Andhra Pradesh Court February 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chamarty Viswanadham and Another Vs. the Icici Bank Ltd. Rep. by Its B ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-03-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President.) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the complainants against the inadequacy of compensation awarded by the Dist. Forum besides non-mulcting liability on the respondent bank due to loss of documents. 2) The case of the complainants in brief is that they are man and wife and that the respondent bank had sanctioned loan amount of Rs. 2,35,000/- payable in 45 equated monthly instalments (EMI) commencing from 7.5.2003 to 7.4.2007 by taking earlier outstanding payable to M/s. Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC). Towards security the bank had demanded them to deposit original documents viz., a) original sale deed No. 42/95 dt. 19.5.1995 b) original link sale deed No. 7341/83 dt. 6.8.1983 c) E.C. No. 493/99 dt. 13.4.199 and d) E.C. No. 3541/99 dt. 15.4.1999. They had repaid the entire loan amount and demanded the bank to return the documents. Despite repeated demands they did not choose to return. Later they heard from the cu...
India Infoline Securities Private Limited Rep. by Its Manager Vs. Cons ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-03-2011
Oral order:(Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) The learned counsel for the respondent, Mr.Masthan Vali, reported no objection for the party in person to conduct his case. Heard both sides. This is an appeal preferred by opposite party No.1, the Manager of India Infoline Securities Private Limited against the order of the District Forum directing it along with opposite party no.2, the Managing Director to pay Rs.1,85,000/- together with interest at 9% p.a. and costs of Rs.2,000/-. The brief facts leading to the filing of the appeal are that the complainant filed a complaint against the appellant and the Managing Director of the company alleging that he deposited Rs.2,22,000/- with the appellant for purchase of one lot of GMR INFRA, 25 RELIANCE CAPITAL, 25 RELIANCE ENERGY, 200 CAIRN INDIA, 200 IDBI BANK, 1000 ASHOK LEYLAND. However, they were not allotted and even the amount was not refunded. On persuasion, the appellant gave a cheque for Rs.35,000/- and the same was bou...
Ahmed Mohammed Vs. Smt U.Rama Devi and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-03-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party no.2 is the appellant. He is the owner and possessor of the land measuring 314 sq.yards in ward no.11 block no.1 Green Hills Colony, Saroornagar Village and Mandal, R.R. District. The opposite party no.2 entered into construction agreement with the opposite party no.1 for development and construction of residential complex under the name and style of Manju Heavens. The opposite party no.1 obtained approval from the local authorities and began to construct the flats as per specifications. The complainant entered into an agreement of sale with the opposite partyno.2 on 19.5.2005 for purchase of double bed room flat No.F2 in 1st floor in Manju Heavens to an extent of 725 sq. feet including common area, for a consideration of `8,50,000/- which was later reduced to `8 lakhs. The complainant had paid `50,000/- towards advance on the date of agreement and the balance sale consideration was agreed to be paid at...
The Principal Kiddie Koop High School Mandi Bazar, Warangal Vs. Jannu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-03-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President.) 1) This is an appeal preferred by Opposite Party No. 1 Principal of Kiddie Koop High School against the order of the Dist. Forum directing the school to pay Rs. 3 lakhs with interest @ 7.5% from the date of filing the complaint viz., 5.3.2005 till the date of realization together with costs of Rs. 500/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that his son a minor Jannu Vivek was a student of R1 school. He joined in the year 2000. He was studying 6th class in 2003. While so, on 15.7.2003 at about 3.00 p.m. when he was in the class room R2 Sri Someshwar a teacher of Social Studies beat the boy mercilessly and due to which he was bleeding from the left eye. Immediately after coming to know, his mother went to the school and complained. Neither R1 nor R2 took responsibility by referring him to any hospital or for any medical aid. They behaved negligently. She took the boy to a local ophthalmologist who in turn, without giving ...
Srinivasa Automobil Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the New India Assurance Company Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-03-2011
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is a complaint filed claiming Rs. 36,97,000/- with interest @ 18% p.a., besides compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs and costs of Rs. 25,000/- against the opposite party insurance company. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that it is an authorized dealer of M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd., sell two wheelers, and spare parts of M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd., It has taken standard fire and special perils policy for a sum of Rs. 50 lakhs covering the period from 30.7.2007 to 29. 7. 2008 covering the stocks of spare parts at Kakinda showroom for Rs. 20 lakhs and the Rajahmundry showroom for Rs. 30 lakhs. It has also taken another policy for Rs. 1,90,000/- commencing from 5.2.2007 to 4.2.2008 for various items inclusive of two wheelers spare parts at V.L. Puram Showroom at Rajamundry for Rs. 22 lakhs. It has enhanced the insured sum from Rs. 30 lakhs to Rs. 50 lakhs on the stocks of two wheelers spare parts at Rajahmundry. The stocks of two wheele...
Balla Institute of Technology and Management, Rep. by Its Director Mr. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-02-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The brief facts of the case as set out in the complaint are that the opposite party is running an Educational Institution and conducting MBA course therein. The complainant no.2 received the prospectus from the opposite party and joined the institute on 2.9.2006 by paying an amount of `75,000/- towards admission fee and tuition fee. The opposite party at the time of admission promised the complainant no.2 that they would provide laptop and placement guarantee card. The complainant no.2 attended the class till 21.9.2005 but the opposite party failed to give laptop and placement guarantee card to the complainant no.2. The opposite party also changed its affiliation from Mysore University to Punjab University without any intimation. The opposite party made false representations. The complainant no.2 has left the institution and sought for refund of the amount paid by him. The father of...
State Bank of India Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. T. Nagaraja
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-02-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The brief facts as seen from the complaint is that the complainant invested a sum of `14,400/- under Scheme No.3 in recurring deposit A/c No.59 on 1.8.1992 for a period of 15 years. The maturity value of the deposit is `1,05,093/-. The maturity date is 1.8.2007. Due to typographical mistake the opposite party wrongly mentioned the date of maturity as 1.8.2008. The complainant brought the same to the notice of the opposite party for which the opposite party assured that there will be no problem and after completion of the said scheme the complainant can receive the amount. The opposite party after the maturity date i.e., 1.8.2007 refused to pay the maturity amount instead offered to give only `9,000/-. The complainant issued notice to the opposite party on 6.9.2007. The opposite party though received the notice failed to give any reply nor comply the demands of the notice. The compla...
Kapil Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Agm Y. Rajendra Kumar Vs. Smt. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2011
ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President.) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party chit fund company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 52,000/- together with damages of Rs. 5,000/- and costs of Rs. 2,000/- 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that on the assurance given by the agent of the appellant chit fund company she joined as a member in the chit floated by the appellant for a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs on 4.3.2005 agreeing to subscribe Rs. 4,000/- for 50 months. Se had paid Rs. 44,000/- towards 11 instalments in lump sum, and she was paying further instalments as stipulated. The agent took signatures on blank and unfilled papers representing that they would fill up properly before submitting in the office of the appellant. While so, when she approached to pay 14th instalment the authorities of the appellant refused to receive on the ground that her name was shown as successful bidder in the chit auction. She never participate...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›