Andhra Pradesh Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kotha Sailaja Vs. Sri Thandu Yadagiri and 6 ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J.Order:1. This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 18-07-2011, in I.A.No.251 of 2011 in O.S.No.110 of 2008, on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Huzurnagar.2. I have heard Sri K.Narasimhachary, learned Counsel for the defendant No.7, and Sri R.Sridhar, learned Counsel for respondent No.1- plaintiff, who is the only contesting respondent.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.4. Plaintiff filed the aforementioned suit for partition of suit schedule property into six equal shares and allotment of 1/6th share to him and for costs. Defendant No.7 is the purchaser of the subject property from defendant Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5, who are no other than the brothers and sister of the plaintiff. Defendant No.7 filed a written statement wherein several defences have been taken. According to him, one Thandu Somaiah, resident of Huzur Nagar, who is the father of the plaintiff, purchased one...
Ahmed Abdul Raheem and Others Vs. Mohd.Abdul Aziz and anr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
R.KANTHA RAO, J.ORDER:1. This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 09.09.2009 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad in I.A.No.769 of 2009 in O.S.No.160 of 2004.2. I have heard Sri V.Ravikiran Rao, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners. None appeared for the respondents/plaintiffs.3. The respondents filed the suit before the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,88,000/- with interest. The suit is based on agreement of sale dated 09.10.2001 and the plaintiffs sought to recover the advance of Rs.1,88,000/- allegedly paid by them together with interest under the agreement. They filed the suit document i.e. agreement to sell dated 09.10.2001 along with the suit. The revision petitioners, who are the defendants in the suit, raised an objection in the written statement that the suit document is inadmissible in evidence as it is not sufficiently stamped and it is not registered....
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Employees
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
K.C.BHANU, J.ORDER :1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Employees' Union, represented by its President C.Satish Kumar filed the present Writ Petition challenging the agreement dated 21.02.2009 entered into by the second respondent with the third respondent for the purpose of developing integrated MSW management system in second respondent corporation area as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to public interest.2. The averments, in brief, of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition may be stated as follows:Petitioner is a registered trade union representing employees working in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'GHMC'). In order to protect the interest of its members and also to see that respondents 1 and 2 are kept within the bounds of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, 'GHMC Act, 1955') and the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 (for short, hereinafter ref...
Gangineni Pitchamma and anr. Vs. Polla Balakrishna and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.JUDGMENT:1. One Mr.Gangineni Kotaiah, husband of the 1st appellant and father of the 2nd appellant is a resident of Khambhampadu Village, Nuzendla Mandal, Guntur District. On 03.01.1996 at 8:00 pm., he was standing in his field. A tractor bearing No. ADW 5962, owned by the 1st respondent, is said to have dashed against Kotaiah and that he was shifted to Government Hospital, Vinukonda for treatment and later on, he was treated in Government Hospital, Guntur. Kotaiah is said to have died on 04.01.1996 at 6:00 pm. The appellants filed M.V.O.P.No.196 of 1996 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Guntur, claiming compensation of Rs.50,000/-.2. The 1st respondent remained ex parte and the 2nd respondent contested the O.P. It denied the liability, on the ground that the accident did not occur in a public place. Through order, dated 23.09.1999, the Tribunal dismissed the O.P. on the ground that the accident has taken place in an agricu...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Visakhap Vs. B. Satyanarayana
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
MADAN B. LOKUR; SANJAY KUMAR, JJ.JUDGMENT:1. Although this appeal was admitted on 22.1.2000, no substantial question of law was framed at the time of admission.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we frame the following substantial question of law:- "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that3. A search and seizure operation was conducted under Section 132(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') i4. After the search and seizure, a notice under Section 158-BC of the Act was issued to the assessee for filing a return of i5. The assessee complied with the notice and filed his return of income declaring the total undisclosed income for the block6. Thereafter, a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued to the assessee and the return was taken up for considerat7. Feeling aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal'). The appeal8. We...
Sri K.Rama Krishna Raju Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Pro. Secretary
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J.ORDER:1. India which was ranked 72nd in the year 2007 in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI), on the basis of a survey conducted by Transparency International, slipped to rank No.84 in the year 2009, from out of 180 surveyed nations, i.e., it was considered far more corrupt in the year 2009 than what was perceived earlier in the year 2007. India's integrity score, a major component of the survey, stood at 3.4 out of the highest score of 10 which indicated that our country had a long way to go in reducing, let alone eradicating, corruption. A country with a higher score from out of 10 is considered to be less corrupt. India's rank was calculated collecting data from 13 sources, all of which measured the overall extent of corruption by gauging the frequency and size of bribes in the public and the political sectors. (K. Srinivasulu v. Government of A.P.1). In the corruption perception index (CPI) for the year 2010, India was ranked even lower at 87 from out of the...
Sas Motors Limited Vs. Adepu Rajender and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member)1. The opposite party no.2 is the appellant. 2. The respondent no.1purchased ANGAD 2400 Tractor vide Engine NO.E05 13800499, Chassis No.E05 240D 00499 Tractor with Trolley of the appellant from the respondent no.2 through the respondent no.3 for `2,30,500/-. The respondent no.1 availed financial assistance from State Bank of Hyderabad Narsampet Branch. The respondent no.1 utilized the said tractor only for 20 days thereafter the said tractor giving mechanical troubles such as stoppage of engine, leakage of water, damage to clutch plates, piston problem etc., Immediately the respondent no.1 informed the same to the respondent no.2 No.1 through the respondent no.3. They have not rectified the defects. On 2-11-2007 the respondent no.1 issued notice to the appellant and the respondent no.2 and 3 demanding to rectify the defects or refund the amount. 3. The respondents no.2 and 3 were set exparte 4. The appellant resisted the case...
M/S Agarwal Foundries, Rep. by Mr.M.L.Agarwal Vs. the Regional Branch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member)1. The complainant is the appellant. The District Forum has dismissed the complaint of the complainant on the premise of proper settlement of the claim by the respondent insurance company. 2. The appellant company had obtained motor vehicle insurance policy on 12.6.2006 and its motor vehicle, truck bearing No. AP 28W 9819 met with an accident on 11.4.2007 at Shapur Hyderabad. The appellant company lodged its claim with the respondent insurance company for `47,695/-. The respondent insurance company had settled the claim for `26,342 towards full and final satisfaction of the claim. The appellant company requested the respondent insurance company to pay the balance amount of `21,353/- 3. The appellant company claimed at `3,000/- per day towards loss for the vehicle being repaired for a period of 25 days, `75,000/- and incidental charges of `20,000/- and an amount of `1,00,000/- towards mental tension and harassment, the appella...
Atluri Kuchela Rao. Vs. the District Collector and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-08-2011
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.JUDGMENT:1. The appellant filed O.S.No.1121 of 1992 in the Court of VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property of a plot of 370 square yards in Road No.3, Banjara Hills. He stated that the suit schedule property is part of plot No.11, carved out by erstwhile Jubilee Hills Municipality; and its allottee Smt.Safia Begum sold it in favour of one Smt.Rangamma and others through sale deed, dated 12.04.1965, under Ex.A.3 and that Ragamma and another, in turn, divided that land into 12 plots and sub-plot No.11, admeasuring 1849.66 square metres, was sold to smt.Iqubal Begum Sayed, in the year 1969. She, in turn, is said to have sold 648 square yards to the appellant under Ex.A.1, dated 05.10.1978. Out of this, the appellant is said to have sold 278 square yards through a document, dated 15.05.1992. It was also mentioned that the respondents made an attempt t...
Shaik Kalesha Saheb and 3 Others Vs. the District Collector, Spsr Nell ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-08-2011
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J.Order:1. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), and declaration issued under Section 6 of the Act in respect of the petitioners' lands admeasuring Ac.0-45 cents, Ac.0-14 cents, Ac.0-18 cents, Ac.0-30 cents and Ac.0-66 cents in Survey Nos.253/3A, 253/4, 253/5, 277/2 A and 277/4 of Kogili Village, Chittamuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. The petitioners are the owners of the above-mentioned lands, which were notified for acquisition for providing house sites to the people, belonging to Scheduled Caste, of Kogili Village. The petitioners have earlier filed W.P.No.17470 of 2007 i.e., before the stage of holding enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act. The principal ground, on which the notification was questioned in the said Writ Petition, was that without conversion of the agricultural land into house sites, acquisition thereof was contrary to the prov...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »