Andhra Pradesh Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kantehti Naga Ramalingeswara Padmanabham Vs. Vasamsetti Raja Gopal and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
V.V.S.RAO, J.ORDER:1. This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed against the order dated 31.01.2011 in A.T.A. No.10 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada. The petitioner filed a petition under Sections 10(1), 15 and 16(1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956 (the Tenancy Act, for brevity) for declaration that he is a statutory protected tenant and for permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein from interfering with his possession. He also sought permission to deposit the value of four kata bags of Paddy per year. He alleged that the first respondent is the owner of land comprised in S.No.121 admeasuring Ac.0.71 cents (out of Ac.1.71 cents); he is a tenant since 14.07.2003; and that he became owner after death of Vasamsetti Sathiraju from whom he took the property on lease. He alleged that when he offered maktha to the first respondent he refused to accept the same and that the first respo...
Raavi Nookaraju Vs. Kotaru Latchayyamma and ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.JUDGMENT:1. The parties herein are referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The 1st defendant in O.S.No.21 of 2002 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Yellamanchili, is the appellant. The 1st respondent i.e. plaintiff, filed the suit for the relief of partition of an extent of Ac.1.20 cents of land into four equal shares and to put her in possession of one such share, besides passing a decree for possession of Ac.0.60 cents of the plaint schedule land, said to have been gifted to her by her father.3. The plaintiff, defendant No.6 and Appala Narasa, mother of defendants 2 to 5, are the three daughters and the 1st defendant is the son of late Raavi Appala Murthy. Two bits of land in survey No.334 of Yellamanchili Village, viz., Ac.1.60 cents and Ac.0.60 cents were purchased by Appala Murthy, through separate sale deeds, on 01-02-1967. Out of the total extent of Acs.2.20 cents, Ac.0.40 cents was acquired by the Government. The plaintiff pleaded that, her fathe...
Komireddi Krishna Vijay Azad Vs. the Bar Council of State of Andhra Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.ORDER:1. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare proceedings vide Roc.No.790 of 2011 Ele 31/2011, dated 12.12.2011, of the respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Clause 13.2 of Handbook for Returning Officers issued by the Election Commission of India.2. I have heard Sri M.Karuna Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.M.Mohiuddin, learned counsel representing the respondent.3. The petitioner is a practicing advocate. In response to the notification issued by the respondent for holding elections, the petitioner filed his nomination. The scrutiny of names was held on 12.12.2011. The petitioner averred that at the time of scrutiny, when he has learnt that the respondent is preparing the list of contesting candidates on ballet papers by showing the petitioner's name as 'Krishna Vijay Azad.K', he has addressed a letter requesting the respondent to show his name as 'Komireddy Krishna Vijay Azad' in the ballet paper. On the same day,...
Sadhineni Rajani and Another. Vs. Adhineni Hymavathi and ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.JUDGMENT:1. This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 17.08.2011 rendered by the Court of II Additional District Judge, Ongole in A.S.No.75 of 2010. Through the said judgment, the lower appellate Court decreed O.S.No.4 of 2005 filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Addanki.2. The relevant facts in brief are as under: One Sri Sadhineni Venkatarao got various items of property through partition in the joint family, as well as through settlement from the first wife of his father. First appellant is the wife, second appellant and second respondent are daughters and first respondent is the mother of Venkatarao. He died on 15.09.2004. Respondents 1 and 2 that is mother and one daughter of Venkatarao filed O.S.No.4 of 2005 for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. They pleaded that the first appellant who is the wife of Venkatarao is trying to alienate the property on the assumption that she is the absolute...
The Food Inspector, Karimnagar District, Vs. Kalluri Bhoomeshwar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2011
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J.JUDGMENT :1) The State filed this appeal against acquittal of the accused recorded by the lower Court of the offence under Section 16(1)(a)(ii), 7(i),2(ia)(b) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short, the Act). P.W-1/Food Inspector obtained sample of green gram dal from shop of the accused i.e., M/s.Rajashekar Kirana Stores, Ibrahimpatnam and sent one of the samples to the public analyst for analysis. The public analyst after analysis sent Ex.P-16 report opining that the sample of green gram dal contains added synthetic food colour "Tartrazine" and is therefore adulterated. The lower Court found the accused not guilty on four grounds.2) Firstly the lower Court came to the conclusion that P.W-1 who is working as junior analyst in the office of Civil Surgeon, Bacteriologist, Regional Laboratory, Warangal and who is functioning as Food Inspector on temporary basis does not possess the requisite qualification by way of undergoing three months tr...
Nandavarapu Ramesh Babu Vs. State Rep.by Its Public Prosecutor, High
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2011
K.G. SHANKAR, J.ORDER:1. It is a curious case. The petitioner is supposed to be A.1 in A.P.R.C.No.4 of 1997 on the file of the Agency First Class Magistrate, Parvathipuram supposedly because the very record is not available. Apparently, no one knows the fate of the case.2. The allegation in the charge sheet is that the petitioner belonged to Kondabardidalam of P.W.G. Group operating in Elwinpeta area. Smt. Vasudha Nagaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner/A.1, however, submitted that the petitioner belonged to CPI (M-L) from 1990 till 1996.3. The petitioner was involved in Crime No.3 of 1996 of Seetampeta Police Station, Srikakulam District. He allegedly was found to be in possession of explosives on 16.01.1996. The petitioner faced trial. He was acquitted by the Court.4. It is the case of the petitioner that in 2001, the petitioner came to know that Non-Bailable Warrant was pending against him in Crime No.1 of 1995 of Neelakanthapuram Police Station, Vizianagaram District. It was a ...
M/S. Shri Ram Life Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Its Asst. General M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-14-2011
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.243/2009 on the file of Dist. Forum,-II,Vijayawada , Krishna Dist, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants wife Rayavarapu Papa took two Life Insurance Policies bearing nos.LN100800186586 and LN 100800186594 from the opposite party company for an assured sum of Rs.60,000/- each with yearly premium of Rs.12,000/- for each policy and the period of insurance coverage being five years. The date of commencement of both policies is 18.12.2008. The complainant was the nominee under both policies. On 27.3.2009 the complainants wife died of sudden cardiac arrest at Help Hospital, Vijayawada and the said policies were in force at the time of death of the policy holder. The complainant informed the fact of death of the insured to the opposite party and submitted the claim forms. But the opposite party repudiated the claim vide its letter ...
Jillela Bhupal Reddy and Another Vs. the State Rep., by the Mandal Exe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-13-2011
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J.ORDER:-1. This criminal petition arises out of order passed by the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Nandyal, dated 16.09.2009, under Section 145 Cr.P.C. Directing persons belonging to A party and B party not to enter into the disputed land of Ac.7.75 cents in Sy.No.25-A1 of Chapirevula village until further orders or until disposal of the case by the civil Court.2. The petitioners 1 and 2 are No.s 1 and 2 of B party. The respondents 2 and 3 are No.s 1 and 2 of A party. Both the parties claim title to the disputed land on the basis of registered documents in their favour executed by the respective vendors. The petitioners filed O.S.No.179 of 2008 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, for declaration of their title and for permanent injunction in respect of the lands against the respondents and others. The respondents also filed O.S.No.119 of 2008 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, against the petitioners for permanent injunction....
Boddula Laxminarayana and Others Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Pros ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-13-2011
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J.ORDER:1. The petitioners 1 to 9/A1 to A9 are accused of offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short, the Act), along with another. The private complaint filed by the 2nd respondent was forwarded by the Magistrate to the Police for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and it was registered as Crime No.452 of 2008 by the Sircilla Police for offences under Sections 500, 506 I.P.C. And Section 3(1)(x) of the Act. After investigation, the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Sircilla, referred the case as false. The 2nd respondent filed Protest Petition before the Magistrate and it was enquired into. During enquiry, the de facto complainant and three others gave their sworn statements. After recording the sworn statements, the Magistrate took cognizance of the case for offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Act, by passing the following order: " Perused the record and the statem...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatna Vs. Ms.Vizag District Milk Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-13-2011
V.V.S. RAO; B.N. RAO NALLA, J.REFERRED CASE No.62 OF 1997ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S. Rao)1. The respondent (the assessee) is engaged in the business of processing milk and manufacturing by-products like ghee, flavoured milk, butter milk, rose milk and kova (hereafter referred to as milk products). In their return of income for the assessment year 1983-84, they claimed investment allowance of Rs.29,957/- on plant and machinery installed during the year relevant to the assessment year. The Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam, while assessing the income under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) allowed the deduction under Section 32A of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam (CIT) suo moto undertook revision under Section 263 of the Act. By order dated 23.3.1988, the assessment was set-aside holding that the assessee is not entitled to any investment allowance for the year 1983-84. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Incom...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »