Andhra Pradesh Court November 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paras Nath Prasad and Another Vs. Smt. G. Bramaramba and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-08-2011
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.755/2009 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the complainants preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants lured by the advertisement of opposite parties to sell flats in the proposed new venture under the name and style of Sri Sai Venkataramana Residency situate at H.No.30-149/1,30-150/1, Plot No.75, Plot No.80 admeasuring 410 sq. yds. or 342.08 sq. mtrs. And 333.30 sq. yds. or 278.60 sq. mtrs. respectively entered into an agreement of sale with opposite parties 1 and 2 on 01-9-2006 to purchase flat No.203 consisting of 1000 sft. in 2nd floor together with undivided share of land of 35 sq. yds. for a total sale consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- inclusive of electrical meter deposit, proportionate expenditure for installation of transformer, municipal water connection and lift etc. in S.Nos.327/1, 328/1, 329/1 and 453 at Santoshnagar, Malkajgi...
Gautham Ganeriwal Vs. the Manager Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-03-2011
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complainant has filed the appeal seeking enhancement of `27,800/- awarded by the District Forum. 2. The appellant had obtained motor accident insurance policy on 21.8.2005 in respect of his truck bearing registration No.AP 10U for the sum assured of `5,57,142/-. The vehicle met with an accident on 1.6.2006. The appellant had lodged claim for `45,800/- towards the damage caused to the truck and towards the medical bill of a person who was injured in the accident. The appellant had addressed letter and got issued notice demanding for settlement of his claim besides lay off damages Rs.1,50,000/- etc.3. The respondent insurance company had resisted the claim on the premise that the loss caused to the third party injured in the accident is not amenable to the jurisdiction of the consumer forum. The appellant had not informed the respondent company within 48 hours after occurrence of the accident and he had made his own...
Sri John Spurgeon Vs. M/S. Sri Laxmipriya Township Promoters Pvt. Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-02-2011
Oral Order (Per Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) This is an appeal preferred against the order closing the E.A. for not furnishing the correct address on the application filed under Section 27 A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Assailing the said order, the complainant preferred the appeal contending that the District Forum ought to have proceeded against the opposite parties in view of the fact that they did not choose to contest even before the District Forum during enquiry and an exparte order was passed. Therefore the question of furnishing correct address of the respondents will not arise as the respondents did not choose to contest the matter in the complaint. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Undoubtedly the District Forum has committed material irregularity in closing the E.A. on the ground that the correct addresses of the respondents were not furnished. The Consumer Forum ought to have resorted to procedure provided under Section 27 A albeit procedure con...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›