Andhra Pradesh Court September 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of Ap, Rep. by Its Principal Secretary to Government Vs. O. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-2010
ORDER: Heard the learned Government Pleader for Services-I and Sri A.Sreedhar, learned Counsel for the contesting respondent No.1. At their request, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for hearing and is disposed of at the interlocutory stage. This Writ Petition is filed, at the instance of the State and the Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam, aggrieved by the order in O.A.No.4314 of 2008, dated 28.01.2010, on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, allowing the application of the first respondent, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking a declaration that the action of the second petitioner in not sending him for three months pre-promotional training course of Head Constables (Civil), 2008 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, that to direct the second petitioner to send him for pre-promotional refresher training course of Head Constables (Civil) 2008, by i...
N.R.S.NarayanA. Vs. Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-2010
ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as a Conductor, in the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation), on 20.03.1980. In the year 2008, he was working in the Ranigunj Bus Depot. On 13.09.2008, he was conducting a service on route No.49. A check was conducted enroute. A charge memo dated 21.10.2008 was issued alleging that the petitioner collected a sum of Rs.20/-, from three passengers, who were scheduled to travel from Secunderabad to Bluemoon Hotel, returned Rs.8/- and instead of issuing ticket of Rs.4/- denomination, each, had issued only one such ticket. It was further alleged that on noticing the checking party, he issued another ticket of Rs.4/- denomination. The relevant provisions of the service regulations were referred to in other subsidiary charges. The petitioner was also placed under suspension. Ex parte enquiry was conducted and the report, dated 05.01.2009, was submitted by the Enquiry Officer, holding that the charges are proved. Taking the same ...
E. Sridhar and Others Vs. Visakhapatnam Steel Plant,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-2010
ORDER: The petitioners are working as Chargemen, or Senior Chargemen, as the case may be, in the Visakhapatnam Steel Plant. Over a period, they have acquired certain qualifications, such as, Associate Membership of the Indian Institute of Welding (AMIIW), Graduate qualification from Institute of Industrial Engineering, etc. The next higher post is Management Trainee (Technical). There are two channels of appointment to that post: One is through direct recruitment, and the other is by restricting the consideration to internal candidates. A circular dated 30- 04-2009 was issued by the respondents, inviting applications to fill 45 vacancies of Management Trainees (Technical), earmarked for internal candidates. In the eligibility criteria, not only the qualifications, viz., Bachelor's Degree or equivalent in Engineering or Technology from recognized Universities or Institutes in various disciplines, ranging from Ceramic to Metallurgy; was mentioned, but also a note was added, to the effect...
D. Jeevan Lal. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-2010
ORDER: The petitioner is appointed as Probationary Development Officer (PDO), in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (for short 'the Corporation'), on 17-12- 2007. His services were terminated by the Corporation through order dated 18- 12-2008, on the ground that he did not meet the stipulated targets, while in probation.He filed W.P.No.9822 of 2009, challenging the order of termination. The writ petition was disposed of, on 23-12-2009, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for extension of probation, on par with other similarly situated PDOs. On 19-02-2010 the Corporation passed an order, expressing its inability to extend the probation of the petitioner. The same is challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner contends that on account of several factors, such as, recession, competition in the market, saturation in the area in which he is working, the prescribed targets could not be achieved, not only by himself, but every PDO in the area. He submits...
Prameela and Others. Vs. the A.P.S.R.T.C.,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2010
1. This writ petition has been preferred by the wife and sons of the deceased - driver of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short `the APSRTC') questioning the validity of the orders passed by the Deputy Chief Traffic Manager, Medak Region, Sanga Reddy, rejecting the appeal submitted by the said driver against the orders passed on 5.7.2008 by the Depot Manager, Zahirabad Depot, imposing on him the punishment of removal from service.2. Sri P.Pandu, was engaged as a Driver Gr.II with the APSRTC w.e.f., 1.9.1988. He was inflicted with punishment of removal from service earlier on 17.5.1990 when he was involved in an accident. When he preferred an appeal against the said orders, he was reinstated back into service. When the Traffic Supervisor of Zahirabad Depot filed an adverse report that the said Pandu was unauthorisedly absent w.e.f., 17.1.2007 to 30.1.2007 without any intimation or prior sanction of leave and that he was also away from duties for 134 days during ...
Prameela and Others. Vs. the A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Its Managing Direct ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2010
ORDER: This writ petition has been preferred by the wife and sons of the deceased - driver of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short `the APSRTC') questioning the validity of the orders passed by the Deputy Chief Traffic Manager, Medak Region, Sanga Reddy, rejecting the appeal submitted by the said driver against the orders passed on 5.7.2008 by the Depot Manager, Zahirabad Depot, imposing on him the punishment of removal from service. Sri P.Pandu, was engaged as a Driver Gr.II with the APSRTC w.e.f., 1.9.1988. He was inflicted with punishment of removal from service earlier on 17.5.1990 when he was involved in an accident. When he preferred an appeal against the said orders, he was reinstated back into service. When the Traffic Supervisor of Zahirabad Depot filed an adverse report that the said Pandu was unauthorisedly absent w.e.f., 17.1.2007 to 30.1.2007 without any intimation or prior sanction of leave and that he was also away from duties for 134 days durin...
Syed Abdul Wahab Vs. Dr. Wilfred D'Souza
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2010
This revision is directed against the order dated 20.12.2007 passed in R.A. No. 405 of 1999 by the learned Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, under Section 20 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short 'the Act'), whereby and where under the appellate authority has reversed the order dated 26.10.1999 passed by the II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad in R.C. No. 161 of 1997 and allowed the appeal filed by the landlord.The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Rent Controller for the sake of convenience.The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows. The petitioner is the owner of the property bearing municipal No.4-1-315, 4-1-326, 4-1-320, 4-1-321, 4-1-322, 4-1-323, 4-1-324 4-1-326 and 4-1-426, situated at Troop bazaar, Bank Street, Hyderabad. Now we are concerned with an extent of 202.65 sq. feet of the property bearing municipal No.4-1-426 (hereinafter referred to as 'the petition schedu...
P.Gopalaiah S/O. P. Venkata Subbaiah, Hindu, Aged About 74 Years, Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-2010
1. This writ petition is filed for a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the orders dated 12.09.2006 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.6548 of 2001 and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal, and consequently direct the respondents to give notional promotion as Superintending Engineer to the petitioner with retrospective effect i.e. 01.7.1987 with all consequential benefits such as pay fixation, arrears and pension etc.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Junior Engineer (now designated as Assistant Executive Engineer) in the year 1956, subsequently, he was promoted as Assistant Engineer (now designated as Deputy Executive Engineer) and then he was promoted as Executive Engineer through G.O.Ms.No.73, I & CAD Department, dated 22.9.1977. As per seniority in the category of Executive Engineer, he was due for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer in the year 1987. There were several va...
Kalakoti Siva Reddy and 9 Others. Vs. the District Collector,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2010
1. The petitioners, 10 in number, claim title and possession in respect of different extents of lands situated in Sy.Nos.300/1, 300/3, 318/11, 322/1, 641/2B, 679/4A, 679/4B, 684/2, 684/4, 684/5B, 711/1B and 711/3B of Nunna Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the notification dated 9.2.2009 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') as well as the declaration dated 4.9.2009 made under Section 6 for acquisition of the lands of the petitioners for a public purpose namely formation of Bypass Road to Nunna village from Km 10.600 to Km 16.000 of Vijayawada - Nuzvid road as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Zonal Development Plan and Master Plan prepared by Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali- Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority (for short, 'VGTM UDA') under A.P. Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 (for short, 'Urban Areas Development Act').2. The facts, which are not in dispute, are...
Srikanth Puskar. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Customs.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-20-2010
1. This writ petition is filed seeking to quash the Order-in-Appeal No. 46 of 2010 (H-II) Cus, dated 21.07.2010 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, (Appeals-II), Hyderabad whereby the Order dated 23.03.2010 passed by the respondent-Deputy Commissioner of Customs confiscating the firearms of the petitioner, was confirmed.2. The brief set of events, which led to the present proceedings are that the petitioner, during his stay in U.S.A. with his wife from 1997 to 2009, purchased rifle and pistol in the years 2003 and 2004 respectively for their safety under valid licence and Transfer of Residence Scheme and also took membership with Rifle Association of A.P. While so, the petitioner asserts that with an intention to leave for India permanently, they shipped the firearms along with required ammunition and personal goods, and submitted a letter dated 25.01.2010 to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Hyderabad with supporting documents requesting him to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »