Andhra Pradesh Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Miss. P. Ramyakrishna
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2010
Oral Order (Per Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the Insurance Company against the order of the District Consumer Forum directing it to reimburse the tuition fee of Rs.45,600/-. 2. The case of the complainant in short is that her father took an insurance policy under tailor made personal accident scheme for Engineering students and parents by paying a premium of Rs.660/, whereby in case of death of the student, the Insurance Company would pay Rs.2,00,000/- and in case of death of the parents, the Insurance Company would reimburse Rs.3,00,000/-, apart from the tuition fee of not more than Rs.25,000/- per annum and hostel fee of Rs.25,000/- per annum. While so, her father died in a road accident on 20.8.2004 and although the death claim of Rs.3,00,000/- was paid, the Insurance Company refused to pay tuition fee of Rs.25,000/- per annum and Rs.25,000/- towards hostel fee covered under clause 1(b) of the said policy. Therefore, she filed the com...
Janagama Shankaraiah. Vs. Panchayat Raj Department and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order, dated 8th June 2010, passed in Proceedings No.A6/2440/10-Panch, by the 2nd respondent-District Collector, in exercise of powers under Section 249(6) of A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. By the aforesaid order, the petitioner is suspended from the post of Sarpanch of Kataram Grampanchayat, for a period of three months, pending investigation into the allegations made against him. The Kataram Grampanchayat is a body constituted under the provisions of the A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of the said Grampanchayat on 29.07.2006. There were certain complaints made against him with regard to misuse of his powers and misappropriation of funds of the Grampanchayat. Several allegations are made against the petitioner mainly on the ground that he has incurred the expenditure on various accounts without recording the said works in the Measurement Book, without any resolution of the Grampa...
Sri B.R.Meena and Others Vs. T.Bajrang and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
This is an intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Initially, an appeal is filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short - 'the Act'), aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge of this Court in CCSR No.4440 of 2009 dated 02.12.2009. When it is pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondents that the appeal under Section 19 of the Act is not maintainable as the contemnor not having been punished for violation of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.26839 of 1996, an application has been filed to convert the Contempt Appeal into an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. The same was allowed converting the Contempt Appeal into an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent. It is not necessary for us to go into the merits of the controversy which lead to filing of the appeal, suffice it to say that the subject matter of the dispute i...
Sri Kanaka Mahalakshmi Ammavaru Devasthanam. Vs. Bokka Venkata Rao and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
This appeal is filed aggrieved by the order, dated 29-07-2010, passed in O.P.No.14 of 1994, by the Subordinate Judge, Razole, East Godavari District.The said O.P. arises under reference made by the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Officer, O.N.G.C., Rajahmundry-2nd respondent herein under Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") to decide the dispute as to the title and to pay the compensation fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer.The Reference Court by the aforesaid order held that the land in question belongs to the appellant-Temple and the 1st respondent herein is a cultivating tenant and therefore, the 1st respondent is entitled for 40% of the compensation and the appellant Temple is entitled for 60% of the compensation deposited by the Land Acquisition Officer into the court along with proportionate benefits accrued thereon. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition is filed.Heard both the counsel. This Court appreciates the argument advan...
M. Balaram Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Hyderabad and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in proposing to install a cell tower over the land admeasuring Ac.0.15 cents in Sy.No.753/1 of Karedu Village, Ulavapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal and arbitrary.I have heard Sri Y. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.The petitioner is the owner of house bearing No.2-45 of Karedu Village, Ulavapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. He averred that to the North of his house, K. Subba Reddy owned an extent of Ac.6.43 cents in Sy.No.753/1, out of which Ac.0.15 cents was alienated to respondent No.4 for the purpose of erection of cell tower. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are proposing to install a cell tower over the said land without obtaining permission from the Gram Panchayat of Karedu. The petitioner averred that already a cell tower of Airtel company is in existence within a distance of about 20 meters of the proposed site and ...
M.R.S. Chits and Financiers and Another Vs. Kisan Patel
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
Oral order: (as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member) The unsuccessful opposite parties preferred this appeal against the order directing payment of Rs.2,63,500/- with interest at 12% pa from 28.06.2004 with compensation of Rs.15,000/-and costs of Rs.3000/- pertaining to the chit fund transaction. The order is assailed as erroneous since the chit transaction in between the parties is unauthorized and that it is an illegal contract which cannot be enforced. The facts of the case are that the opposite party approached the complainants father and lured him to join in the chit. So his father took membership in the chit Group No. STM -2M-17 for a value of Rs.2,10,000/- for a period of 30 months and for each month Rs.7000/- to be paid and the chit commenced in the month of December, 99 and it was completed by 29.06.2002. The opposite party again induced that they are conducting unauthorized chit and in case he becomes a member he will get more profits for a value of Rs.2,50,000/- for a per...
The Senior Divisional Manager Vs. Smt. Bobbili Anasuya
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
Oral order: (as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member) The appellant is the unsuccessful opposite party in CC 527/2006 on the file of the District Forum I, Visakhapatnam where under an order was passed directing to pay Rs.1,40,000/- with benefits if any covered by the policy in question and also directed to pay Rs.10,000/- towards compensation and costs of Rs1000/- The facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainants husband B. Ramalingam haD ensured his life by obtaining six polices from the Opposite party. While undergoing treatment in seven hills hospital he died on 28.2.2004. Prior to obtaining policy he never took any treatment and he never complained of ill health. The Opposite parties repudiated the claim in respect of the last three policies bearing Nos. 692633484, 692635176 and 673597498 alleging that the deceased had suppressed material information regarding his personal health. The repudiation of the claim is aributed as deficiency in service and unfair trade prac...
The Managing Director Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-04-2010
Oral Order (As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The appeal is filed by the opposite party challenging the order of the District Forum-I, Visakhapatnam in C.C.621 of 2008. The factual matrix of the case is that the complainant being SB A/c holder of the State of Bank of India had obtained health Shield Insurance Policy bearing No.RS000085320000103 through the State Bank of India from the opposite party for a period of one year and the policy was renewed from time to time till 1st July 2008. The opposite party without informing the complainant cancelled the insurance policy. The complainant was not inclined to discontinue the policy as he intends to derive the benefit of medical insurance coverage for him and his wife at the advanced age. The Condition No.4 of the insurance policy stipulates notice of 14 days in advance besides refund of the amount the last paid premium less a prorata part thereof. The opposite party, as seen from the impugned order remained exparte despite service...
Smt. Uppalapati Nirupa Rani and anr Vs. Koganti Lakshmi and ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-2010
(per Hon'ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) 'Aabharan' is a firm. First respondent herein is its partner. The firm is in the business of selling imitation jewellery, stone ornaments, antic ornaments, fashion bangles and hair accessories. The shop is situated in rented premises bearing door No.40-1-53B owned by U.Aditya and his sister U.S.Spandana, at Benz Circle, Vijayawada. The lease was negotiated by their parents - appellants herein; in whose favour owners executed GPA. First respondent found that their shop was burgled in the intervening night of 15-16th of November, 2009. Their partner gave a report to fifth respondent. The same was registered as crime No.586 of 2009. Alleging that Station House Officer (SHO), P.S., Machavaram (fifth respondent) is not investigating, first respondent filed writ petition seeking a direction to respondents 2 to 5 to entrust investigation to Crime Branch of Crime Investigation Department (CBCID). Learned single Judge issued mandamus as prayed. Further direct...
R. Upendra Vs.A. Govardhan Reddy and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-2010
The appeal is directed against the award in O.P. No.663 of 1993 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nalgonda, dated 23-01-1998. The petitioner before the Tribunal was involved in a motor accident on 30-08- 1993 at about 4 P.M. when lorry A.P. 13T 878, driven rashly and negligently in high speed, dashed against him, while he was going by walk at Bandameedi Chandupatla village. The petitioner, aged 10 years, was returning from the school and suffered a crush injury on the left leg and injuries on the hands and other parts of the body. The petitioner was also working as labourer earning Rs.20/- per day and is the only son to his parents and immediately after the accident he was shifted to Government hospital, Suryapet and then to Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, where the left leg was amputated. Hence, he sued the owner and the insurer of the lorry for a compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- in respect of the permanent disability suffered. The owner of the lorry remained ex pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »