Andhra Pradesh Court August 2010 Judgments

Guguloth Babu Rao and Others Vs. M/S. Surakhsa Chit Funds, Yellandu, a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2011(NOC)153(AP)

This Civil Revision Petition is directed by the JDRs 1, 2 and 4 against the impugned docket order dated 18.01.2010 passed in E.P. No.21 of 2010 in O.S. No.216 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District. The first respondent herein appears to have filed a suit in O.S. No. 216 of 2006 for recovery of money based on a chit transaction. The said suit was decreed on 08.06.2009. The first JDr was a successful bidder. He agreed to forego Rs.80,000/- out of Rs.2,00,000/-. According to him, he was paid total prize amount of Rs.1,20,000/- in three cheques and two adjustment vouchers. It is the case of the DHR that JDR No.1/first petitioner herein committed default in payment of 29 instalments of Rs.5,000/- each and basing on the same he filed the suit. The defendants 2 to 4 stood as sureties. It is the case of the JDR No.1/first petitioner herein that the first respondent/plaintiff obtained signatures on blank promissory note and guarantee bond etc. It ...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd and anr. Vs. K. Narasimlu and Others.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This appeal is directed against the award in O.P. No.1248 of 1996 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dated 31-07-2000 awarding a compensation of Rs.41,500/- with proportionate costs and interest at 12 per cent per annum from the date of the petition till the date of realization against all the respondents jointly and severally. The factual background for the appeal is that on 09-07-1996 at about 9.45 A.M., the 1st respondent herein and one J. Madhukar were proceeding in auto No.AP 23T 1360, while another auto No.AET 6950 came in opposite direction and dashed against their auto near Laxmi Rice Mill in the outskirts of Kulabgur village. The 1st respondent herein and Madhukar sustained grievous injuries and were shifted to Government hospital, Sangareddy where Madhukar died. Later the 1st respondent herein was shifted to Gandhi hospital, Secunderabad and was treated there. Sangareddy police registered Crime No.83...

Sree Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Rice Mill and Others Vs. United India ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member.) These petitions are filed to punish the opposite parties for non compliance of the order in C.D.Nos. 106/1993, 108/1993 and 109/1993 dated 29-9-2008. The order in C.D.Nos.106/1993, 108/1993 and 109/1993 dated 29-9-2008 reads as follows: In the result these C.Ds. are allowed in part and opposite parties are directed to pay the amounts as assessed by their surveyor i.e. Rs.4,72,000/- in C.D.No.106/1993, Rs.38,200/- in C.D.No.108/1993 and Rs.3,08,000/- in C.D.No.109/1993 respectively together with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the complaints till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance four weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the appeals preferred by the respondents/opposite parties was dismissed confirming the order passed in C.Ds. The brief point that falls for consideration is whether the insurance company is entitled to deduct the T.D.S...

State of A.P. Represented Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hydera ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

:COMMON : (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu) 1. Criminal Appeal by the State represented by the Public Prosecutor is filed against the order of acquittal of the respondent-sole accused of the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity 'IPC') passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Asifabad, Adilabad District, vide judgment, dated 17-02-2005, in Sessions Case No.178 of 2003.2. Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner-accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') against the order, dated 20-01-2004, in Crl.M.P.No.9 of 2004 in Crl.A.No.178 of 2003, wherein the petition filed by the petitioner herein under Section 311 r/w 91 Cr.P.C. and Section 45 r/w 50 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short 'the Act') seeking DNA test for P.Ws.2 and 3 to decide their paternity, was dismissed. 3. Brief facts, that are necessary for disposal of the prosecution case may be stated as follows: Ra...

J. Mohan Reddy Vs. Panasonic Avc Networks India C. Ltd. and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: (Per Smt. M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.N o.620/09 on the file of District Forum-II , Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that opp.party no.1 is the manufacturer of Panasonic T.V. L.C.Ds. having Head Office at Noida , U.P. , 2nd opp.party is the authorized sales and service center of Panasonic products having head office at Chennai and opp.party no.3 is the sales and service branch at Hyderabad and the dealer to promote the business of opp.parties 1 and 2. The complainant purchased LCD T.V. 32LX75 from Habsiguda branch of opp.parties on 7.11.2007 for a sum of Rs.49,999/-. The complainant submits that the said T.V. never worked properly and became dead on 27.4.2008 and when the complainant reported to authorized service agent of opp.party Comtel Systems and Services, Karnic Towers, Khairatabad, Hyderabad one service technician Mr.Ramesh visited the complainants house on 28.4.2008 and re...

Smt. Chilukuru Umadevi W/O Anjaneyulu Visakhapatnam and Another Vs. Ka ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by Smt. Chilukuru Umadevi and Ganapatineedu Venkata Narayana seeking writ of Certiorari to quash the award dated 14.2.2008 passed in LSA 143 of 2008 on the file of District Legal Services Authority (Lok Adalat) at Visakhapatnam.2. Background facts, in a nutshell, leading to filing of this writ petition by the third parties to the award dated 14.2.2008 passed in LSA 143 of 2008 are: Ganta Babu Rao-4th respondent owned 1100 square yards in Block No.11, Patta No.18, Sy.No.2 in Balayya Sastry Layout bearing Dr.No.49-54-7/1, Assessment No.100003/30169. He executed a possessory Agreement of sale-cum- irrevocable power of Attorney dated 9.10.2006 conveying the land owned by him and delivered possession to the petitioners. While so, Kalidindi Vijaya Lakshmi and Kalidindi Viswanatha Raju-respondents 1 and 2 filed O.S.No.1359 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam against Mallu Dinis...

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Rep. and ors. Vs. G.Prabhakar Rao, S/O. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Heard both the learned counsel. The application C.M.A.M.P.No.188 of 2009 is filed by the petitioners 1 and 2, who are third parties to the main appeal, namely Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam and Rama Krishna Mutt, as proposed parties, under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {"CPC" for brevity}, to grant leave to implead them in C.M.A.No.830 of 2006. In another application, C.M.A.M.P.No.1160 of 2010, same petitioners invoking Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 {"the Act" for brevity}, sought to revoke the orders of this Court in C.M.A.No.830 of 2006 dated 21.06.2007 granting probate. Whereas, in the third application in C.M.A.M.P.No.1161 of 2010 filed under Section 151 CPC sought direction to the respondents 1 to 3 and their transferees in title not to further alienate or create any third party interest in the land admeasuring Acs.10.37 gts in R.S.Nos.170/1 and 172 of Tumkunta Village, Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the above Revoc...

S. Abdul Azeez Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member.) Both counsel present A cheque for Rs.1,44,637 is given to the complainant being the balance amount (interest ) in respect of the amount covered by the order in C.D.No.38/2000. Full satisfaction reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant who undertook to file a memo. Accordingly the P.P. is closed. There shall be no order as to costs....

R.Kondaiah, S/O.Kumara Swamy Vs. Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The writ petition is filed challenging the communication dated 31.8.2001 of the second respondent, namely, the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), rejecting the request of petitioner to waive Additional Compounding Fee (ACF) levied in the proceedings of CCLA dated 08.3.1999. Petitioner contends that levy of ACF is discriminatory and volatile of petitioner's right under Article 14 of Constitution of India.The allegations in the affidavit accompanying the writ petition are as follows. The plot No.3119 admeasuring 405 Sq.yards situated at Rashtra Pathi Road (then called King's way) was allotted to petitioner's uncle, Buchi Veeraiah on 15.12.1936 on monthly rent of Rs.5/- for a period of 30 years with option to extend for a further period of sixty years. The lessee obtained permission and constructed double storeyed building in 1936. Subsequently the plot was divided into three being plot Nos.3119/1, 3119/2 and 3119/3. Petitioner's father, Kumara Swamy, and the lessee Buchi V...

M/S. Balaji Packing Vs. the General Manager and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member.) The learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the matter is settled out of court and requested this Commission to permit him withdraw the appeal. In view of the memo, this appeal is dismissed as settled out of court. There shall be no order as to costs. The counsel for the appellant as prayed in his memo is permitted to withdraw the statutory deposit, if any, by filing an appropriate application....