Andhra Pradesh Court July 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Yenni Surya Rao an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
1.This is an appeal filed by the Insurance Company challenging the award in M.V.O.P.No.504 of 2006 dated 12-01-2009 on the file of the District Judge-cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Srikakulam to the extent the award fastening the liability on it. 2.The first respondent is the Claimant in O.P.No.504 of 2006 and the second respondent (owner of the offending vehicle - motorcycle No.AP 30 E 3915). 3.On 04-06-2006 the first respondent herein (Claimant in O.P.) was proceeding on his scooter bearing No.AP 31 M 4116 from the Government Hospital, Srikakulam. A motorcycle bearing registration No. AP 30 E 3915 belonging to the second respondent herein driven by one Yarabati Chandrasekhara Rao came in the opposite direction and dashed against the scooter. On account of the said incident, the Claimant sustained multiple injuries and the scooter was also badly damaged. He, therefore, filed the O.P. and sought for a compensation of a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-. The second respondent (owner of the veh...
G. Ramulu Alias Venkat Ramulu Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C. Hyderabad.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
This appeal is directed against the judgment in O.P. No.2311 of 2000 on the file of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dated 21.10.2002, whereby and where under an amount of Rs.25,000/- was awarded by the learned Chief Judge under 'no fault liability'. Being aggrieved by the same, the appellant-injured claimant filed the present appeal.The facts in brief are that on 23.7.2000, while the appellant was driving auto trolley bearing Registration No. AP 13 T 2808 and when he reached Tirumala Music Centre at Malakpet, an R.T.C. bus bearing Registration No. AAZ 8404, belonging to the respondent-Corporation came in a rash and negligent manner with high speed and over took the appellant's trolley from behind to the extreme left side, due to which the rear portion of the bus hit the auto trolley. Consequently, the auto turned turtle and fell on the appellant causing grievous injuries besides fracture of vertebra. Immediately, he was shifted to Osmania General Hospital. T...
L.J. Ramaiah, West-godavari and Others Vs. the Cement Corporation of I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
The petitioner was selected and appointed as Deputy Manager (Marketing) in the Cement Corporation of India (for short 'the Corporation'), a public Sector Undertaking, the 1st respondent herein, on 11-01-1985. Thereafter, he was promoted as Assistant Manager (Marketing) in the year 1995, and posted in the southern zone. In August 1998, two charge-sheets were issued by the Disciplinary Authority of the Corporation, the 3rd respondent herein. The petitioner filed W.P.No.29636 of 1998, challenging the said two charge-sheets. This Court granted interim stay of further proceedings on 10-11-1998. During the pendency of the said writ petition, the Disciplinary Authority issued another charge-sheet dated 24-12-1998 to the petitioner. The charges were, mostly about the failure of the petitioner to submit returns of his movable and immovable properties, and acquisition of properties without intimation to the Corporation. He did not submit any explanation within the stipulated time. The Disciplina...
Pabba Satyamma @ Renykunta Balaiah Vs. Pabba Sathyamma and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the auction held on 28- 01-2010 in pursuance of the order passed in I.A.No.481 of 2005 in O.S.No.55 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Siddipet. O.S.No.55 of 2000 between the petitioner herein and the respondents herein was filed by the respondents 1 and 2 for partition and separate possession of the suit house bearing Door No.6-2-68 situated at Borra Hanuman Temple, Siddipet and a preliminary decree was passed by the trial Court on 11-12-2003 granting 2/3rd share to the plaintiffs and 1/3rd share to the revision petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 herein. A.S.No.6 of 2004 against the preliminary decree at the instance of the revision petitioner was dismissed by the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet on 22-10-2005 and Second Appeal No.1569 of 2005 was dismissed by the High Court on 23-06-2006. Thereafter, an Advocate Commissioner was appointed by the trial Court to effect partition of the property by metes and bou...
Angadi Srinivasa Rao Vs. the State of A.P. Rep
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
1.This Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 307 and 401 Cr.P.C., is filed by the petitioners challenging the judgment dated 11.10.2004 passed in Crl.A.No.611 of 2001 by the VII Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, whereby and whereunder, the learned Additional Sessions Judge confirmed the judgment dated 26.11.2001 passed in S.C.No.796 of 1998 by the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Guntur. The first petitioner herein (A-2) was found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 25 (1B) (a) of the Arms Act and was sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three months along with A-1. Similarly, the other petitioners i.e. A-3, A-5, A-7 and A-8 respectively were also found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 25 (1B) (a) R/w. Section 35 of the Arms Act and were convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default,...
M/S Shriram Chits (P) Ltd Vs. K. Lakshmi Tulasi
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member.) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.107/2006 on the file of District Forum, West Godavari at Eluru, the opposite party preferred F.A.No.971/2007 and the complainant preferred F.A.No.1484/2007. Since both the appeals arise out of the same C.D. they are being disposed of by a common order. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that complainant joined as a Member in Chit Ref.EMT. 1/5 on 23-6-2002 for Rs.10,00,000/- and the monthly instalment was Rs.25,000/- for a period of 40 months conducted by opposite party. The complainant submitted that after paying instalments from August 2002 to April, 2003 she was forced to leave the town under some unavoidable circumstances and she requested the opposite party to terminate her from the chit and refund the amount lying in her account and opposite party allowed her to close the chit and promised to refund the amount but in spite of repeated requests, they failed to refund the amoun...
The Chairman and Managing Director and Others Vs. Varalakshmi Enterpri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
Oral Order (Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties, the Electricity Board, against the order of the District Consumer Forum directing it to issue service connection to the complainants premises, besides compensation of Rs.10,000/- and costs of Rs.1,000/-. 2. The case of the complainant in brief is that it is firm represented by its Managing Partner. It purchased 25 cents of land from one Siribathina Thrimurthulu for establishing ice factory on 6.7.2006 for Rs.1,34,000/-, vide sale deed Ex.A.1. When he made application for sanction of new service connection, the Electricity Board directed him to pay Rs.3,05,860/-. Accordingly the same was deposited by way of six pay orders drawn on Karur Vysya Bank, Eluru on 27.11.2006. He also submitted LT agreement. While so, on 24.1.2007 the Electricity Board issued a demand notice directing him to pay Rs.1,47,485/- on the ground that the previous service consumer was due. The said demand...
Dr. J.P. Sharma Vs. M/S First Medical Services Rep. by Its Proprietor
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
Oral Order (As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The complainant is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the order dated 26th Day of June,2007 in C.D.No.135 of 2003 by the District Forum, Nizamabad whereby his complaint was partly allowed directing the opposite party to repair the Colour Doppler system and pay costs to the complainant. The factual matrix of the case is that the complainant purchased a Colour Doppler ATL 9 HDI for his scanning centre from the opposite party for a consideration of Rs.8,50,000/-. As per the agreement, initial amount of Rs.1lakh was paid on 25th April, 2002 and thereafter an amount Rs.6 lakh was to be paid and balance amount of Rs.1lakh was to be paid at the time of installation of the equipment. The opposite party informed the complainant that model equipment ordered by the complainant was not available. The complainant paid an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- through his Bank and ACUSOL 128 HP with similar features that of the equipment as ordered by t...
Korada Sanyasamma Vs. Smt. Mandadi Adilakshmi and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.160 of 1999 in the Court of IX Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), at Visakhapatnam, against the 2nd respondent for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 21-09-1997, in respect of 44 cents of land in Sy.No.98/1 of Vemulavalasa Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Subsequently, she added the appellant herein as 2nd defendant. It was pleaded that the 2nd respondent executed an agreement of sale, promising to sell the suit schedule property for a consideration of Rs.50,000/-, i.e. @ Rs.12,500/- per cent, and that she paid an advance of Rs.1 lakh on the date of agreement. The 1st respondent stated that she is willing to perform her part of contract, and in spite of repeated requests, the 2nd respondent did not execute the sale deed. Reference was made to the notices, that were exchanged, as well as to the effort made by the 2nd respondent to give an impression that the agreement was only in r...
E. Rajeswari and Others Vs. T.S. Sekhar and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
The appellants filed M.V.O.P.No.96 of 2008 before the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi (for short 'the Tribunal'), claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-, as compensation, on account of the death of Sri E.Ankaiah, husband of appellant No.1, father of appellant No.2 and son of appellant No.3. It was stated that Ankaiah was proceeding on a bicycle on 19-09-2007 at 6.00 p.m., in Puttur Village on Puttur- Tirupathi Road and a Car bearing No. AP-03-AC-3253, owned by respondent No.1 and insured with respondent No.2, came in a rash and negligent manner and hit him. Ankaiah was shifted to Community Health Centre, Puttur and there, he was given first-aid. When he was being shifted to a Government Hospital, at Tirupathi, he succumbed to injuries, on the way. Crime No.96 of 2007 was registered by Puttur Police Station against the driver of the vehicle and post-mortem was conducted on the deceased.The appellants pleaded that the deceased was earning a ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »