Andhra Pradesh Court July 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.S. Raju Vs. Md. Hassena and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2010
(Per Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) 1. These appeals are preferred by opposite party No.1 against the orders of the District Consumer Forum, Karimnagar, directing opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay the maturity amounts covered under the Fixed Deposit Receipts issued by M/s.Nagarjuna Finance Limited with interest and costs. 2. Though the District Forum has passed separate orders on the complaints filed by husband and wife against the very same parties, in view of the fact that common questions of fact and law arise we deem it fit that a common order can be passed in these two appeals. 3. The case of the complainants in brief is that they had deposited amounts with opposite parties 2 and 3 viz. M/s.Nagarjuna Finance Limited which in turn agreed to pay the amounts after maturity. By virtue of the order of the Company Law Board, they had surrendered the F.D.Rs, and though they promised to pay did not pay the amounts. They requested time to wail till the reframing of the schedule f...
Kaveri Blood Bank Vs. Smt. Asiya Sultana and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2010
(Typed to the dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member.) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.704/2003 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, opposite party No.2 preferred F.A.No.1699/2007 and opposite parties 1 and 3 preferred F.A.No.1777/2007. Since both the appeals arise out of the same C.D. they are being disposed of by a common order: The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant went to opposite party No.1 on 12-6-2002 for gynaec problem who after examination advised operation to avert cancerous effect. Opposite party No.1 also advised the patient to have blood transfusion before operation since her hemoglobin level was low and referred her to opposite party No.2, blood bank for testing her blood group and after conducting tests, the patient was informed that he blood group is B positive and by charging Rs.800/-, the blood was sold under a receipt. The blood supplied by opposite party No.2 was transfused to her by opposite party No.1 and she was advised...
M/S Narne Estates (P) Ltd. and Another Vs. Lt. Col.D. Sivarama Prasad
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2010
Oral Order (As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The opposite parties no.1 and 2 in C.C.No.404 of 2008 on the file of District Forum-III, Hyderabad are the appellants herein. The complainant filed the complaint contending that on 20.8.1992 he became member with membership no.9235 and was allotted plot no.48, Block-W in Sector IV. He booked a house site plot, admeasuring 250 sq.yards with a total cost of Rs.20,150/-. Initially at the time of joining as a member an amount of Rs.5,150/- was paid to the opposite party and it was acknowledged by the opposite parties and a receipt was issued to that effect on 20.8.1992. The balance amount of Rs.15,000/- has to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments of Rs.1,250/- each. The complainant has paid the total cost of the plot by 23.10.1992. The opposite parties collected an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards developmental charges, Rs.6,000/- towards registration charges and Rs.5,000/- towards club fees from the complainant by issuing a nil balance...
B.F. Bastawala and Others Vs. the Telegragh Traffic Employees Co-op.Cr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2010
Smt. M. Shreesha, Member: The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainants deposited certain amounts with opposite party No.1, who has issued the following fixed deposit certificates in the name of the complainants: S.No. Name FD.No. Amount Date 1. Mr.B.F.Behmanshah 0968 Rs.1,00,000-00 02-1-2006 2. Mr.B.F.Behmanshah 0969 Rs.1,00,000-00 02-1-2006 3. Mr.B.F.Behmanshah 2154 Rs.1,00,000-00 05-6-2006 4. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 0756 Rs.40,000-00 03-11-2005 5. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 0829 Rs.1,00,000-00 03-11-2005 6. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 3657 Rs.2.30,000-00 03-11-2005 7. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 0755 Rs.1,00,000-00 03-11-2005 8. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 0957 Rs.1,00,000-00 29-12-2005 9. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 4500 Rs.4,00,000-00 23-12-2005 10. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs.Yasmin Behmanshah 4527 Rs.5,35,000-00 18-1-2008 11. Mrs.Freny Behmanshah andMs...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›