Andhra Pradesh Court April 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Rekha Vs. B. Susheelendra
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2010
B.N. Rao Nalla, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against order dated 08.04.2002 passed in O.P. No. 273 of 1999 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for brevity 'the Act') for dissolution of the marriage, was allowed. The wife filed this appeal.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in O.P. No. 273 of 1999.3. The marriage between the petitioner-husband and the respondent-wife was solemnized on 09.07.1989 as per Hindu customs and rites. Immediately after the marriage, the respondent joined him at matrimonial home at Ramkoti in the joint family house of the petitioner consisting of his parents and his younger brother and started insisting the petitioner on setting up separate family. While so, during pregnancy, the respondent went to her parents' house and gave birth to a baby-girl on 09.08.1990, and ...
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co., Ltd Vs. M/S Sumangali ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2010
Oral Order (As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) These two appeals sprouted from the order dated 8.10.2007 in C.D.No.118 of 2003 passed by the District Forum, Ananthapur. F.A.No.1784 of 2007 has been preferred by the opposite party whereas F.A.No.67 of 2009 has been preferred by the complainant. The facts of the case are that the complainant engaged in textile business in a rented premises at Ananthapur regularly obtained fire policy A from the opposite party which was renewed from 30.4.2001 for the sum assured Rs.80,05,000/-. On 30.6.2001 due to electrical shock circuit fire broke out resulting damage to the entire stock in trade, furniture and establishment. The complainant informed the about the accident to the opposite party and the fire department as also the police concerned. Subsequently, the complainant had sent a telegram in regard to the accident to the opposite party. The complainant had furnished the documents required such as income tax and sales tax turnover assessmen...
M.K. Exports, Repted. by Its Managing Partner, K. Sri Rama Murthy and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-2010
ORDERSamudrala Govindarajulu, J.1. The petitioners in these 8 petitions are traders and licencees of Agricultural Market Committee, Bhimavaram. There is no dispute that they are liable to pay market fees to the 1st respondent-Market Committee. Subject matter in these 8 petitions relates to underassessment of market fees payable by them during the year 1999-2000. After giving show cause notice under Section 12-B(5) of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live Stock) Markets Act (in short, the Act) balance of market fees payable by the petitioners was determined. For non payment of the said balance of market fees assessed under Section 12-B(5) of the Act, the 1st respondent Market Committee filed complaints before the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Bhimavaram alleging offence punishable under Section 23 of the Act. Questioning the said prosecutions, the licencees/accused filed these petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing cases filed by the 1st res...
i.L.N.V. Prasad Reddy and Another Vs. Malim Ishaq and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2010
Oral Order (As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The opposite parties no.1 and 2 are the appellants. The appeal is challenge to the order passed by the District forum-III, Hyderabad in C.C.No.39 of 2006. Briefly stated the facts of the case as represented by the complainant is that the opposite parties no.1 and 2 issued account payee cheque bearing No.002320 dated 24.8.2005 for Rs.1,64,000/- drawn on the opposite party no.4 in discharge of the legal debt. As per the request of the opposite parties no.1 and 2, the complainant presented the cheque before his banker i.e., opposite party no.3 on 20.2.2006 for realization. As per the procedure opposite party no.3 should send the cheque to opposite partyno.4 for collection and after receiving the amount from opposite party no.4 it should be credited to the account of the complainant. The cheque was returned unpaid by the oppose partyno.3 along with return memo dated 24.2.2006 issued by the opposite party no.4 stating that the validity pe...
M/S. Dhanalaxmi Roto Spinners Ltd Vs. A.P. Power Generation Corporatio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2010
(Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order of the Dist. Forum declining the relief of refund of Rs. 1,87,254/- on termination of the agreement. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that it is a company obtained H.T. service connection No. MBN 439 for its industrial purpose from the respondent A.P. Power Generation Corporation Ltd. (herein after called APGENCO) by deposing Rs. 3,13,610/-. Later agreement was terminated with effect from 25.5.1998 confirmed by the Superintendent Engineer (Op2) by his letter Dt. 16.9.98. When it sought for refund of the deposit the respondents did not pay. On that it has issued legal notice on 17.7.2000 for which respondent gave reply on 12.4.2001 with false allegations. Failure to refund the amount constitutes deficiency in service and therefore sought for a direction against the respondents to pay Rs. 3,13,610/- with interest @ 12% p.a., from 25.5.1998 till the date of payment t...
M/S. Ramana Solvex Private Ltd Vs. the Branch Manager, the New India A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2010
(Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1. Appellant is the unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brie if that it is a registered company, engaged in the business of solvent extraction i.e. extraction of oil from cakes by investing an amount of Rs.2.00 crores and started commercial production in the month of November, 2003. It took a fire policy to cover the stock worth Rs.1,53,000/-and building valued at Rs.31,00,000/- covering the period from 24.11.2003 to 23.11.2004. Since there was shortage of space in the said premises it has taken another premises on lease situated at a distance of km and informed the said fact to the Insurance Company. While so, there was a fire accident on 16.04.2004 and when it was informed to the Insurance Company it appointed a surveyor who assessed the loss at Rs.16,49,949/-. However, the claim was repudiated on the ground that the fire accident took place in the premises not covered by the terms of the policy. In fact the new p...
i. Chakravarthi and Other Vs. M/S. G.P.R. Housing Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-19-2010
(Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the complainants dis-satisfied with the order of the Dist. Forum directing the respondents to refund the amount instead of directing them to execute sale deed. 2) The case of the complainants in brief is that complainant Nos. 2 and 3 are son and wife of complainant No. 1 respectively. They joined as members in the scheme floated by the respondents to sell house plots each consisting of 200 sq.yds for Rs. 45,999/- payable in instalments. They were allotted pass books. While the first complainant had paid Rs. 37,100/-, second complainant had paid Rs. 42,050/- and the third complainant had paid Rs. 35,700 totalling to Rs. 1,14,850/-. When they sought for registration of the plots the respondents are delaying on one pretext or the other. In the process they suffered mental agony. Therefore they sought registration of plots or in the alternative refund the said amount together with interest, compensation and...
Sakam Sujatha Vs. Golden Trust Financial Services and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-16-2010
(Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1. The appellant is the unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brief is that her husband, Subbi Reddy had taken Personal Accident Insurance Policy covering the period from 31.03.2005 to 30.03.2010 for Rs.3,00,000/-. While so, on 04.04.2005 at about 8.00 p m while he was attending calls of nature, a snake bitten him. Immediately he was taken to Govt. Hospital, Proddatur, where he succumbed. On a report, police registered a case in Crime No.47/2005, followed by inquest and post mortem. When the complainant, being the nominee under the policy, claimed the amount, it was repudiated on the ground of non-occurrence of the incident. Therefore, the complainant filed the complaint claiming Rs.3,00,000/- together with interest, costs and compensation. 2. The Insurance Company resisted the case. However, it admitted the issuance of policy. It alleged that the District Forum, Kadapa has no jurisdiction. Its office is situated at K...
M/S. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd Vs. Chand Chausha
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-16-2010
Oral order:(Per Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.51/2006 on the file of District Forum, Mahaboobnagar, opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant obtained a loan of Rs.1,71,000/- vide loan agreement No.MHLN140940 from the opposite party on 5-6-2001 for purchasing Mahindra-475-D1 tractor bearing registration No.AP 22 U 6788 from Srirama Engineering Company, Mahaboobnagar. The opposite party fixed EMIs at Rs.6,250/- per month to be paid in 36 months and the complainant regularly paid 10 instalments i.e. Rs.65,000/-. In December, 2004 the complainant paid a sum of Rs.15,000/- to one Ashok Kumar, Manager of opposite party at Mahaboobnagar and found that the said Ashok Kumar has not credited the said amount to his account and therefore he made a oral complaint to the Head Office on telephone, consequently after due enquiry the said Ashok Kumar was dismissed from services by the opposite party. ...
Faqueer Ahmed Vs. Dr. N. Venkataram Reddy and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2010
(Per Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1. Appellant is unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brief is that his daughter Farath Sultana was suffering from breathing problem. Therefore, he took her in October, 2001 to opposite party No.1 for treatment. Opposite party No.1 suggested the name of opposite party No.2 for laser surgery. Accordingly, she was taken to opposite party No.2, who conducted operation on 04.12.2001. He advised her to come again on 10.12.2001. On the said day, he again checked up and asked her to come again for further treatment on 19.02.2002. She was again brought to opposite party No.2 who conducted another operation and discharged on the very same day on 15.07.2002 . Opposite party No.2 conducted endoscopic test and other tests and asked her to come on 27.07.2002 for another operation. On that day she was operated. She was discharged on 29.07.2002 asking her to take medicines and to come after six weeks. However, in the month of August...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »