Andhra Pradesh Court March 2010 Judgments

Kumari Donagiri Vimala and ors. Vs. Government of A.P., Higher Educati ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT187

ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. This batch of Writ Petitions raises common questions of fact and law. They are, therefore, heard and being disposed of together.2. The petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 5925, 5276, 4919, 5911, 6304 and 6516 of 2010 are B.Tech students, who were admitted during the academic year 2009-10 under Category-B seats by the respective private colleges, impleaded as respondents in these Writ Petitions (for convenience they are referred to as 'the Colleges'). Their admissions are governed by the Andhra Pradesh Un-Aided Non-Minority Professional Institutions (Regulation of Admissions into Under-graduate Professional Courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 2006 (for short 'the B.Tech Admission Rules'), as amended by G.O.Ms. No. 175, Higher Education (EC.2) Department, dated 19-8-2008.3. The petitioners in rest of the Writ Petitions are MBA students, who were also admitted during the academic year 2009-10 under Category-B seats by 'the Colleges'. Their admissions...

K. Santha Kumar Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT195

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed invoking Certiorari jurisdiction of this Court to quash the order dated 07.2.2010 passed by the third respondent, namely, District Collector, in exercise of revisional powers under Clause 21 of Andhra Pradesh State Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2008 (Control Order, for brevity). It is mainly contended that the impugned order is vitiated by non-disclosure of reasons for dismissing the revision petition submitted by petitioner against the order of second respondent, namely, Joint Collector, who confirmed the order of first respondent, namely, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle (RDO). Be it noted that RDO by an order dated 21.11.2007 cancelled Fair Price Shop (FPS) authorization of petitioner, which was confirmed by the appellate authority against which revision was filed before the third respondent.2. The fact of the matter is not in dispute. The petitioner was appointed as FPS dealer of Kuppanapally Village by proce...

Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society, Rep. by Its President Vs. State of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT173

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society, Kosgi Village and Mandal filed this writ petition seeking a declaration that the order dated 27.01.2009 passed by the 2nd respondent - Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Mahaboobnagar - rejecting the request of the petitioner society for grant of licence for the period 2008 - 2013 on the ground that the petitioner society had suffered disqualification under Rule 5(2)(a) & (c) of A.P. Excise (Grant of Licence to sell Toddy, Conditions of Licence and Tapping of Excise Trees) Rules, 2007 (for short, 'Rules, 2007') as arbitrary and illegal.2. The facts, in brief, are as under:The petitioner society was granted five licenses for sale of toddy (four licenses for shops and one license for toddy depot) for the period from 1.4.2003 to 31.3.2007. The said licenses were cancelled on 26.05.2006 on the ground that the toddy samples drawn from shop No. 2 and the toddy depot were found to be adulterated with Chloral Hydrate. Aggrieved by the ...

P. Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. United India Insurance Corporation Ltd

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.2/2006 on the file of District Forum, Kadapa, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of mini lorry no. AP04-U-4841 and he got insured it with the opposite party by paying premium of Rs.10,853/- coverage period being from 4.10.2002 to 3.10.2003. On 5.12.2002 while Chamanthi flower baskets belonging to different farmers were being transported from Kadapa to Chennai and the lorry was returning on 6.12.2002 along with said ryots who transported the Chamanthi flowers and when the said vehicle reached Rajampet Main Road the lorry hit a tree and two persons sitting inside the cabin died and others sitting in the lorry received injuries. The case was registered as Crime no.70/2002 against the driver of the said mini lorry and the accident was intimated to the opposite party insurance company who appointed insurance surveyor and he ...

Nova Group of Colleges Nova Degree and P.G. Colleges and Others Vs. Ka ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The opposite parties are the appellants. The appeal is challenge to the order passed by the District forum-II, Vijayawada in C.C.No.26 of 2007. Briefly stated the facts of the case as represented by the complainant are that the complainant is post graduate (M.Sc. Physics) and was selected by the opposite parties as lecturer in Physics and worked with them for about three months. Later her service was terminated without assigning any reasons or issuing prior notice. At the time of interview the opposite parties took the provisional certificate, marks statement etc., of the complainant. Even after termination of her services the said documents were not returned to the complainant. Hence, the complainant got issued a legal notice dated 27.06.2006 to the opposite parties for return of the documents and payment of arrears of salary. The opposite parties no.1 and 3 remained exparte. The opposite party no.2 resisted the case admitting the ...

K. Kanneganti Prabhakar Rao S/O. Sri Ramakrishna, Union Bank of India ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

ORDERR. Subhash Reddy, J.1. The petitioner herein, who is an Assistant Manager in the Union Bank of India, seeks for a Writ of Certiorary, calling for the records pertaining to the Memorandum of Articles of Charge and Statement of Allegations bearing No. FGMO:CMHR:355, dated 16.12.2009, and quash the same by declaring as illegal and arbitrary.2. The petitioner is an employee of the 1st respondent-Bank, and is working as Assistant Manager in Bheemavaram branch, in West Godavari District. On 12th of December 2008, the 2nd respondent herein has issued a Memo to the petitioner, alleging certain acts of omission and commission on his part, during his tenure as a Branch Manager at Pulla branch. The petitioner has submitted his explanation, dated 6th January 2009, to the aforesaid Memo. Dissatisfied with the explanation offered by the petitioner, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, and a Charge Memo was issued by framing 4 charges, which read as under:1. Failure to take all p...

Koganti Lakshmi Vs. State Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Pr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT200

ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in investigating into burglary/robbery committed in the night of 15/16-11-2009 in Aabharan shop, bearing Door No. 40-1-53B of Benz Circle, M.G. Road, Vijayawada, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner also sought for a direction to the respondents to handover the case to an independent agency, like CBCID, for proper investigation.2. The petitioner is the Managing Partner of the shop, by name, Aabharan, located in the above mentioned premises. The said premises was allegedly taken by the petitioner and their partners on lease under agreement, dated 1-7-2009, on a monthly rent of Rs. 18,000/- from the GPA holders of original owners, by name, U. Aditya and U.S. Spandana, residents of USA. The petitioner specifically alleged that from the first week of November, 2009, the parents of the original owners of the said premises, by name, Smt. U. Nirupa Rani and her husband-Sri...

Smt. Gali Suvarna, and ors. Vs. Vadla Raghuram, and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. This revision is preferred under Section 28 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') questioning the order of the learned Joint Collector - II, Ranga Reddy District dismissing the petitioner's appeal being File No.F1/4364 of 2005 dated 20.09.2005, preferred under Section 24 of the Act, as time barred.2. The facts, in brief, are as follows:The land admeasuring Ac.0.19 guntas situated in Sy.No.70, Ghanapur village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was an inam land where late Vadla Kistaiah was recorded as original pattadar/inamdar as on 01.11.1973. The petitioners 2 to 4 and the third respondent are the legal representatives of the said Vadla Kistaiah and all of them together said to have sold the schedule property to the first petitioner. It is alleged that the first respondent, grandson of Vadla Kistaiah, approached the primary tribunal under the Act i.e. Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District and obtained an occupancy c...

Raghavendra Hospital Vs. Konda Thomas Prabhudas

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.543/2007, on the file of District Forum-III, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred F.A.No.299/2008 and opposite party preferred F.A.No.338/2008. As both these appeals arise out of the same C.D., both appeals are being disposed of by a common order. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant was the Heritage Health Card holder and consulted a Doctor at Reghavendra Hospital which is recognized by the Heritage Health Services and paid registration fee of Rs.225/- and it was diagnosed as a suspect case of acute Appendicitis. Based on the first consultant doctors findings, the surgeon had suggested admission into the hospital. The complainant submits that the surgeon had not taken into account the history of present and past illness and not examined the complainant and not suggested any investigations and diagnosed the case as Acute Appendicitis and that an emergency appendectomy opera...

The National Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Vuluvala Linga Reddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.49/2006 on the file of District Forum, Nalgonda, opposite party no.3 filed this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that during the life time of Vuluvala Lalithamma who is the wife of the complainant herein, she took Group Personal Accident Policy covering a period from 15.6.2004 to 14.6.2014 through opposite parties 1 and 2 for a sum of Rs.1 lakh. On 23.8.2004 the complainants wife i.e. the insured herein died due to snake bite at Nakrekal village, Nalgonda District. Crime no.94/2004 was registered and after the due enquiry the police filed charge sheet stating that the said Lalithamma died due to snake bite. Inquest, Panchanama and Postmortem were also conducted on the deceased Lalithamma. It is submitted that the complainant approached opposite party no.1 with all the documents and a claim form is issued on 11.9.2004 and all the certified copies were submitted on demand through opp...