Andhra Pradesh Court February 2010 Judgments

Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. by Its Branch Manager and An ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties, insurance company, assailing the order of the District Forum. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainant is the wife of the insured, Bontha Ramaiah, who worked as Senior Assistant in U.P.S.Yerragadda, M.P.Tirumalayapalem, Khammam District and died on 5-10-2005 while in service and during his life time obtained a policy bearing No.681765054 for an assured sum of Rs.25,000/- on 14-6-1999 with maturity date being 15-6-2014. The insured also obtained another policy bearing No.686615098 for an assured sum of Rs.1,00,000/- on 13-12-2004 from opposite party No.1 and died on 5-10-2005. After the death of the insured, the complainant preferred a claim along with the relevant documents and the opposite parties postponed the settlement of the claim and on 18-3-2006 sent a letter stating that the insured committed suicide within one year from the date of the policy and tha...

T. Muralidhar Rao S/O. AnanthasaIn Rao and K. Sriteja, Minor Rep. by H ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(2)ALT357

ORDERAnil R. Dave, C.J. and on behalf of A. Gopal Reddy, V. Eshwaraiah and G. Raghuram, JJ.1. The cases on hand project another facet of reservations to Backward Classes in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The Legislature of the State of Andhra Pradesh has enacted 'The Andhra Pradesh Reservation in favour of Socially and Educationally Backward Classes of Muslims Act, 2007' (A.P. Act 26 of 2007) (hereinafter referred to as 'the 2007 Act') for providing reservations to the extent of 4% of total seats to backward classes among Muslims in the matter of admissions in educational institutions and in public employment for their upliftment. We, therefore, feel it expedient to briefly trace the history of reservations in the State.Background of reservations in Andhra Pradesh2. Even before the State of Andhra Pradesh had been formed, reservations to backward classes in educational institutions and in public services had been provided under G.O. Ms. No. 110 dated 30th May, 1953 to 112 Castes by the S...

The Krishna Country Canal Boat Workers and Labour Contract Co-operativ ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT100,2010FAJ104

ORDERGopala Krishna Tamada, J.1. Pursuant to the auction notice No. 478/Q/2007 dated 07.03.2008 issued by the respondent inviting applications for grant of leasehold rights in respect of Sand Reach, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, the petitioner society has participated in the auction conducted on 27.03.2008 and became the highest bidder for a sum of Rs. 1,15,55,999/- for a period of one year. Accordingly, the respondent issued work order on 04.04.2008 and executed a lease deed in favour of the petitioner on the same day. When the petitioner was about to start the quarry operations, the respondent directed the petitioner to stop quarry operations on the ground that this Court, by an order dated 16.04.2008, in W.P. No. 7681 of 2008, restrained it from enjoying the leasehold rights. After dismissal of the said writ petition, at the request of the petitioner, the respondent has issued despatch permits on 14.07.2008 and since then the petitioner has been continuing the quarry operations. ...

Pariti Suryakanthamma W/O Late Jagannadham and Mula Naga Bhushana Rao ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(2)ALT648

ORDERG.V. Seethapathy, J.1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 21-10-2009 in O.S. No. 162 of 2005, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, wherein an unmarked document dated 07-11-1990 described as partition list (pampakapu jabitha) was permitted to be admitted in evidence.2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for both sides. Perused the record.3. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs. They filed the suit against the respondents/defendants for a declaration that they are the absolute owners of the plaint schedule house and for a permanent injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with their possession and enjoyment. The respondents/defendants filed written statement and contested the suit. During trial, evidence was recorded on both sides and the matter, stood posted for arguments. At that stage, the defendants filed I.A. No. 789 of 2008 to reopen the evidence and another I.A. No. 790 of 2008 to recall D.W.1 for f...

B. Shyam Vs. Srinidhi Enterprises (Regd) Rep. by Its Managing Partner ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member: The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. His prayer seeking direction to the respondents for payment of amount under maturity bond Rs.11,000/- along with interest @ 36% per annum, Rs.5 lakhs towards compensation, Rs.10,000/- towards damages and Rs.1,500/- towards costs of the complaint was denied by the District Forum. The brief averments of the complaint are that the opposite parties no.1 to 4 established finance business under name and style of M/s. Srinidhi Enterprises (Regd). They have introduced a finance scheme wherein the appellant has joined as subscriber and invested an amount of RS.8000/- @ Rs.500/- per month. The opposite parties issued cash certificate with maturity amount of Rs.11,000/- and the date of maturity as 24.9.2002. After the date of maturity the complainant requested the opposite parties to pay the maturity amount, the opposite parties failed to repay the same. The complainant got issued legal notice through his c...

G. Krishna Murthy Naidu Vs. Haragopal Auto Motors, Rep. by It’s M ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member: The complainant is the appellant. The appellant challenges by way of filing this appeal the order of dismissal of his complaint by the District Forum, Vizianagaram in C.D.No.145 of 2005. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant purchased Yamaha Crux R in exchange with his Hero Honda Motor Cycle and paid on 13.1.2004 the balance amount after adjusting the amount of Rs.16,000/- towards the cost of the Hero Honda Motor Cycle. The appellant has purchased the Yamaha Motor Cycle from the respondent no.1. Soon after taking delivery of the vehicle, the appellant found a defect in its silencer and complained of the same to the respondent no.1 who replaced the silencer with a new silencer. Thereafter for about six months there was no problem or complaint in respect of the vehicle. During the fourth service at Parvathipuram, the silencer and gear case were found defective. The appellant has brought to the notice of the third responden...

Bongu Chinnammadu Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The complainant is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum, Srikakulam in C.D.No.72 of 2006. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent no.2 has sanctioned a loan of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant who is a member of Sri Rama Women Self Help Groups Paddajonnavalasa Village of Amadalavalasa for purchase of jersey cow worth Rs.10,000/-. The respondent no.2 insured the cow and the other members cattle by paying the premium covering the insurance period from 4.2.2003 to 3.2.2006. Thereafter, the cow died on 17.2.2003 due to Acuto-tympany disease. The appellant informed the same to the respondent no.1 and lodged claim through the respondent no.2. The respondent no.1 having received the claim form failed to arrange payment in spite of legal notice got issued by the appellant. Hence the appellant filed the complaint and sought direction to the respondents to pay Rs.10,000/- towards the sum a...

Vattikonda V. Anantharama Rao Vs. Voruganti Narayana Rao

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(2)ALT641

ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 26-10-2009 passed in O.S. No. 52 of 2003 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kodad, the defendant has filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. Voruganti Narayana Rao, the plaintiff filed the suit against Vattikonda V. Anantharama Rao, the defendant, for eviction and damages. The defendant resisted the suit by filing written statement. The plea of the defendant is that he purchased the suit schedule property under an agreement of sale from Para Seethaiah and he issued notice to Seethaiah to execute a registered sale deed pursuant to the agreement of sale. The trial Court settled the issues and the plaintiff adduced evidence on his behalf. The defendant commenced evidence on his behalf. He filed I.A. No. 55 of 2007 to summon his vendor-P. Seethaiah for cross-examination. The trial Court, allowed the application, by order dated 5-12-2007. The plaintiff assailed the order dated 5-12-2007 by filing C.R....

Sri Bhavana Rishi Co-op. House Building Society Vs. A.P. Information C ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT360

ORDERNooty Ramamohana Rao, J.1. The petitioner, a Co-operative Housing Building Society, questions the legality and validity of an Order passed on 08-04-2008, by the 1st respondent - Information Commission, constituted under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short 'the RTI Act'), allowing the Appeal preferred by the 2nd respondent herein.2. The petitioner is a Co-operative Housing Building Society, registered under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 (henceforth referred to as 'the Co-operative Societies Act'). It is formed essentially for the purpose of providing house sites to its members. The area of operation is confined to the erstwhile Medchal Taluq in Ranga Reddy District. The 2nd respondent is a member of the petitioner Society. He filed an application invoking the provisions of the RTI Act for supply of the following information:(1) Upto date list of total members of the Society with addresses.(2) List of members who were allotted plots ...

K.S.H.Prasada Rao Vs. Kakinada Divisional Electrical Engineer, A.P. Ea ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order of the District Forum passed at execution stage in E.A.No.89 of 2005 in C.D.No.281 of 2003. The appellant has filed complaint before the District Forum claiming compensation alleging deficiency in service on the part of the respondents herein. The Dist. Forum after considering the entire record opined that the electricity board was liable to furnish within a period of two months the statement indicating as to how the amounts of Rs. 130/-, Rs. 255/-, Rs. 139/- and Rs. 141/- towards minimum charges for monthly periods 5/2002 to 8/2002, 11/2002 to 2/2003 were adjusted and in case the amounts are not adjusted refund those amounts and furnish a statement mentioning the number of units consumed by the complainant from 2/2003 to 10/2003 with opening and closing meter readings. The board was also directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- towards compensation, and Rs. 2,000/- towards costs. T...