Andhra Pradesh Court February 2010 Judgments

Lakanam Venkata Raman Rao (Died) and anr. Vs. Ponnamanda Alivelamma

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT233

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. Lakanam Venkata Ramana Rao filed O.S. No. 257 of 2006 against Ponnamanda Alivelamma, for partition of vacant site admeasuring 540 Sq.yards in premises bearing No. 4-5-22 situated at Ward No. 4 of Narsapur Town in West Godavari District. After regular trial, the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Narasapuram, passed preliminary decree on 20-6-2007. The preliminary decree directed partition of plaint schedule property into two equal shares by metes and bounds and defendant was directed to give one such share to plaintiff and deliver separate possession. Thereafter, accepting the report of advocate commissioner, trial Court passed final decree on 31-12-2008, showing plaintiff and defendant as parties. The final decree was engrossed on Non-Judicial (NJ) stamp papers and the same was forwarded to Sub-Registrar, Narasapuram. In the mean while, unfortunately, Venkata Ramana Rao died on 04-2-2009 at Nellore. His wife, Smt. Padmavathi, filed an application being I.A. No. 363 of ...

The Managing Director, Hero Honda Motors Limited and Another Vs. Md. R ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order: Syed Abdullah, Member: The appellants are the opposite parties in CC 415/2006 before the Distinct Forum I, Visakhapatnam where under an order was passed directing the opposite parties 1 and 2 to take return of the vehicle from the complainant and to refund Rs.32,899/-Aggrieved by the impugned order this appeal is filed Briefly stated the facts of the case are that OP 1 is the manufacturer of Hero Honda Motorcycle. OP 2 is the dealer cum authorized agent of OP1. The complainant had purchased Hero Honda CD Delux Motor cycle on 25.1.2006 from OP 2 paying a cost of Rs.32,899/-. OP 1 gave an advertisement that the above said motor vehicle gives highest mileage of 80 kms per litre. Believing the said advertisement the complainant had purchased the said vehicle but on usage the vehicle was giving mileage of 40 km per litre only. Even after two services, there was no improvement. Mileage testing was done on 9.3.2006, 10.4.2006, 20.4.2006 and 5.5.1006, even then, mileage was 40 kms ...

Pappala Grahaneswara Rao and Another Vs. Paluri Appalanarasayya and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order: Syed Abdullah, Member: The appellants are the unsuccessful complaints in CD 94/2006 before the DCF, Vizianagaram and a complaint that was filed to direct the Opposite parties to execute a sale deed in respect of the scheduled lands in pursuance of an agreement of sale deed dated 16.10.90 executed by one P. Satyanarayana on payment of consideration was dismissed. The impugned order has been challenged as erroneous and sought it to be set aside. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Opposite parties 1 to 8 are the children of Paluri Satyanarayana and that the said Satyanarayana executed an agreement of sale deed dt.16.10.90 to an extent of two Acres of land in favour of the OP. No. 9 by receiving consideration of Rs.two lakhs delivering possession of the land promising to execute a registered sale deed as and when demanded. After the death of Paluri Satyanarayana, Opposite parties refused to execute the sale deed in pursuance of the agreement. After lodging a poli...

Pappala Grahaneswara Rao and Another Vs. Sri Paluri Appalanarasayya an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order : ( as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member ) The appellants are the unsuccessful complaints in CD 94/2006 before the DCF, Vizianagaram and a complaint that was filed to direct the Opposite parties to execute a sale deed in respect of the scheduled lands in pursuance of an agreement of sale deed dated 16.10.90 executed by one P. Satyanarayana on payment of consideration was dismissed. The impugned order has been challenged as erroneous and sought it to be set aside. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Opposite parties 1 to 8 are the children of Paluri Satyanarayana and that the said Satyanarayana executed an agreement of sale deed dt.16.10.90 to an extent of two Acres of land in favour of the OP. No. 9 by receiving consideration of Rs.two lakhs delivering possession of the land promising to execute a registered sale deed as and when demanded. After the death of Paluri Satyanarayana, Opposite parties refused to execute the sale deed in pursuance of the agreement...

M/S. Shriram Bioseed Genetics India Limited and Another Vs. V. Bikshap ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order : ( as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member ) The appellants 1 and 2 are the unsuccessful Opposite Parties 1 and 2 in CD 199/99 before the District Forum, Warangal against whom an order dated 29.12.2006 was passed directing to pay compensation @ Rs.10,800/- per acre to each of the complainants 1 to 10 to the extent of the land in which the seeds that were sowed and those seeds were produced and sold by the Opposite parties, so also, directed to pay the interest on the respective amounts due. The impugned order has been challenged as erroneous and sought to set aside taking the stand that in the absence of satisfactory evidence that the seeds were of inferior quality or defective one especially, when there is an admission by the complainants that the generic purity is good which was also certified by the Cotton Scientist of Fact Finding Committee that the genetic purity is good In nutshell, the facts of the case are that the complainants are residents of Mallampalli village,...

M/S. Shriram Bioseed Genetics India Limited and Another Vs. V. Bikshap ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order: Syed Abdullah, Member: The appellants 1 and 2 are the unsuccessful Opposite Parties 1 and 2 in CD 199/99 before the District Forum, Warangal against whom an order dated 29.12.2006 was passed directing to pay compensation @ Rs.10,800/- per acre to each of the complainants 1 to 10 to the extent of the land in which the seeds that were sowed and those seeds were produced and sold by the Opposite parties, so also, directed to pay the interest on the respective amounts due. The impugned order has been challenged as erroneous and sought to set aside taking the stand that in the absence of satisfactory evidence that the seeds were of inferior quality or defective one especially, when there is an admission by the complainants that the generic purity is good which was also certified by the Cotton Scientist of Fact Finding Committee that the genetic purity is good. In nutshell, the facts of the case are that the complainants are residents of Mallampalli village, Warangal District and...

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Vs. S ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by insurance company questioning the order of the District Forum that went against it. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant insured his vehicle with the appellant by paying the requisite premium upon which the appellant issued a policy in respect of the subject vehicle valid from 8-7-2005 to 7-7-2006. On 2-3-2006 the said lorry dashed against a tree in the road margin, as a result it suffered damage. The complainant filed a claim with the appellant to recover the expenses for the repairs. The said claim came to be rejected by the insurance company branding it as false. Thereupon the complainant filed the present C.D. from out of which this appeal arises claiming Rs.2,00,000/- towards the repairs, Rs.15,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.10,000/- towards costs. The said claim came to be resisted by the opposite party on the ground that the complaint was not maint...

Toddy Co-operative Society, Toddy Group of Khammam, Rep. by Its Presid ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT134

ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. Toddy Co-operative Society, Toddy Group of Khammam District at Khammam and some of the individual members of the Society filed these writ petitions seeking writs of certiorari calling for records pertaining to showcause notice dt. 22-3-2007 as to why toddy shop of TCS, Khammam Nos. 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 to 20 should not be cancelled under Section 31(2) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 and orders of the Government dt. 9-11-2009 dismissing the revision petition filed by the Society upholding the orders Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Khammam as confirmed by the Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Warangal and Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and to quash the same by issuing a necessary direction to the Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Khammam District at Khammam to issue licenses to the Toddy Depot, Khammam and shop Nos. 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, whose licenses were cancelled earlier.2. Relevant facts shorn o...

Smt. Sattiveera Venkata Satya Ananta Laxmi W/O. Late Trinadha Rao Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

ORDERC.V. Ramulu, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus directing the third respondent to issue death certificate certifying the death of petitioner's son Sathi Chandra Shekar, in Gowthami Express Train Accident, which occurred on 31.7.2008, after getting DNA Test Reports from Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad or alternatively direct to issue certificate basing on prima facie evidence of travel of Sathi Chandra Shekar, as per travel/reservation chart and approval of TTC confirming travel of petitioner's son and consequently direct the first respondent to grant ex gratia to the petitioner on par with the dependants of victims of Train accident.2. According to the petitioner, her son Sathi Chandra Shekar boarded Train No. 2738-Gowthami Express at Secunderabad for Rajahmundry after purchasing tickets for S-10 coach berth No. 36. When the train crossed Kesamudram moving towards Dornakal, near Tallapusulapally, fire erupted in S-10 coach and the same was spread to S-9, S-...

Velakkayala Kumari Vs. General Manager, South Central Railway and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT318

ORDERC.V. Ramulu, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue death certificate certifying the death of petitioner's husband Velakkayala Satyanarayana in Gowthami Express Train Accident, which occurred on 31.7.2008, after getting DNA Test Reports from Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad or alternatively direct to issue certificate basing on prima facie evidence of travel of petitioner's husband as per travel/reservation chart and approval of TTC confirming travel of petitioner's husband and consequently direct the first respondent to grant ex gratia to the petitioner on par with the dependants of victims of Train accident and also direct the third respondent to release Insurance amount to the petitioner under AUM AADMI LIFE INSURANCE SCHEME covered to the deceased.2. According to the petitioner, her husband Velakkayala Satyanarayana boarded S-10 Coach of Gowthami Express Train on 31.7.2008 at Secunderabad for Kakinada by purchasing ti...