Andhra Pradesh Court February 2010 Judgments

Sakalabhaktula Ramesh Vs. Assistant Engineer, E. P.D.C. of A. P. Ltd K ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order : ( as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member ) Being aggrieved by the order dated 13th July, 2007 passed in C.D. No.33/2006 by the District Forum Srikakulam dismissing the complaint filed for cancellation of the bill demanding to pay Rs.37939.15, which was issued towards consumption of the energy so also to cancel the demand for Rs.1,878.78 issued for surcharge by ordering payment of compensation of Rs.10,000/- against the OPs 1 to 3. The impugned order is assailed as erroneous and sought to be set aside. The facts of the case are that the complainant had taken a service connection for his Modern Rice Mill under category No. III situated at Billumada village. Regularly consumption charges were paid without any default. The complainant earlier had filed consumer disputes against the OPs alleging that the department has been issuing wrong bills by filing CDs 11/2003 and 59/2004. Even during the pendency of CDs wrong bill was issued. As per the orders of the District Forum he pa...

Sakalabhaktula Ramesh Vs. Assistant Engineer, E. P.D.C. of A. P. Ltd a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order : ( as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member ) Being aggrieved by the order dated 13th July, 2007 passed in C.D. No.33/2006 by the District Forum Srikakulam dismissing the complaint filed for cancellation of the bill demanding to pay Rs.37939.15, which was issued towards consumption of the energy so also to cancel the demand for Rs.1,878.78 issued for surcharge by ordering payment of compensation of Rs.10,000/- against the OPs 1 to 3. The impugned order is assailed as erroneous and sought to be set aside. The facts of the case are that the complainant had taken a service connection for his Modern Rice Mill under category No. III situated at Billumada village. Regularly consumption charges were paid without any default. The complainant earlier had filed consumer disputes against the OPs alleging that the department has been issuing wrong bills by filing CDs 11/2003 and 59/2004. Even during the pendency of CDs wrong bill was issued. As per the orders of the District Forum he pa...

Gundu Parvathamma Vs. Penubarthi Sreenivasulu

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT247

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. This Second Appeal arises out of judgment and decree dated 17.06.1996 in A.S. No. 12 of 1990 on the file of learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Gudur, Nellore District, whereby he confirmed the judgment and decree dated 31.03.1990 in O.S. No. 192 of 1983 on the file of learned District Munsif, Venkatagiri, Nellore District.2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.3. The plaintiff is the appellant. She filed the above mentioned suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the small extent of 21 square yards of property in Venkatagiri Town. The plaintiff had set up her title to the suit schedule property on the basis of registered sale deed dated 20.06.1983 purchased from the original owner of the property i.e., hereditary trustee of Sri Kasi Viswanadhaswamy Temple. The said sale deed was marked as Ex.A1. It is admitted case that a part of the suit property on the southern side was in occupation of the defe...

State of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-op. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT17

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. This writ petition is filed by the State represented by the Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation Department, Hyderabad and other officers against the order dated 24-7-2009 passed in OA No. 5143 of 2009 with VMA No. 905 of 2009 by the AP Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.2. The facts stated are:- the applicant-1st respondent herein pursuant to the notification issued on 7-2-2009, by the District Collector, Sri Potti Sreeramulu Nellore District, to fill-up the posts of Agricultural Extension Officers, applied to the said post. The qualifications prescribed for the said post was diploma in agriculture polytechnic. But as the applicant was a holder of diploma in agriculture (seed technology), the authorities-petitioners herein entertained a doubt as to whether diploma in agriculture polytechnic is equivalent to diploma in agriculture (seed technology). To clarify this position, the applicant approached Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Hyder...

Zeena Giri Vs. Modern Life Style Interior and Furniture

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mrs. M. Shreesha, Member: Oral: 1. Aggrieved by the Order in C.C. No. 488/2009 on the file of District Forum-III, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased a dining table with a glass top from the opposite party on 12.7.2008 paying an amount of Rs. 17,000 and this table was delivered to them on the same day. She submits that she was verbally informed that the product had one year guarantee and on 12.4.2009 i.e. exactly 9 months after purchase there was an explosion and the dining table burst into small pieces. The complainant along with her family members was sitting in the living room when there was a loud explosion and the pieces of glass flew past them and her younger son received a slight injury and it took nearly 30 minutes for the glass to stop bursting. There was expensive glassware and crockery on the dining table worth more than Rs. 3000 and all of them broke due to explosion. When the compl...

D. Ramakrishna Rao S/O. Bangaraiah and ors. Vs. Lrr Hatcheries Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

A. Gopal Reddy, J.1. This intra-Court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the orders of the learned Single Judge, dated 10.7.2001 dismissing the Company Appeal No. 3 of 1999.2. Relevant facts shorn of details, which gave rise for filing this appeal are as under:Appellants filed a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act before the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi alleging that themselves and the respondents 2 to 8 are the shareholders of first respondent - M/s. LLR Hatcheries Pvt. Limited, which was incorporated for carrying on business in hatcheries and related activities. The first appellant and the respondents 2 to 4 were signatories to the Memorandum of Articles of Association of Company each subscribing to 5 shares. Over a period of time, by issuing of further shares/transfers, the appellants' group happen to hold 6900 shares as against the respondents' holding of 5500 shares. The first appellant was a Director in-charge of ...

Satyam Computer Services Limited Vs. Venture Global Engineering Llc an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT1

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.Introduction1. This revision petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India is by Satyam Computer Services Limited (Satyam) against the order, dated 03-11-2009 in I.A. No. 1331 of 2009 in O.P. No. 390 of 2008 passed by the Court of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. By the said order, learned Chief Judge while granting permission to Venture Global Engineering LLC (Venture) having its principal office in Michigan, to file additional pleadings took on record the additional pleadings in O.P. No. 390 of 2008. The order is impeached mainly on the ground that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Arbitration Act or the Act) bars any additional pleadings being brought on record in a petition to set aside an arbitral award.Fact of the matter2. The admitted factual position in brief is as follows. Satyam and Venture formed Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited (SVES) - second respondent herein; for providing eng...

Tankasala Ashok and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010CriLJ2074

ORDERSamudrala Govindarajulu, J.1. This petition is filed by the accused Nos. 3 and 4 (A-3 and A-4) under Section 482 Cr. P. C, for quashing proceedings in C. C. No. 258 of 2006 on the file of II Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Nellore relating to offence punishable under Section 500 I.P.C.2. Subject matter of this petition is news item in Nellore Town Tabloid of Vaartha daily news paper dated 8-10-2002, which relates to committing of rape by a father on his daughter. In the news item, name of the culprit is given as suspended police constable Venkata Mastanayya with Roll No. 1219. It is contended that the 2nd respondent is the Police Constable with Roll No. 1219 and not the culprit and that even though the culprit was police constable with Roll No. 1299, the accused gave Number as 1219 in order to defame the de facto complainant. On those allegations, the 2nd respondent filed private complaint in the lower Court against the reporter Nagendra Singh as A-1, Desk In ch...

Kumar Metallurgical Corporation Limited Rep. by Its Director, Sri. M. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT412

ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. In these petitions, the petitioner has obtained a rule from this Court calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of certiorari (wrongly prayed as mandamus) should not be issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for calling up and quashing common order dated 28-02-2005 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (for short, 'the appellate Tribunal') in R.A Nos. 10 and 11 of 2005, whereunder the appeals filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 against the orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short, 'the Tribunal') in S.A. No. 15 of 2005 were allowed by setting aside the order passed by the Tribunal, dated 07-02-2005.3. The facts which are not in dispute, briefly stated, are as under:The petitioner - Company availed credit facilities from ICICI Ltd., (subsequently merged with...

Sanjay Kumar and anr. Vs. Secretary, City Civil Court Legal Services A ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT289

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed seeking writ of certiorari to quash the order, dated 30.08.2008 passed by III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad-cum-Presiding Officer, Lok Adalat and an order of even date passed by II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts in E.P. No. 15 of 2003 and for a consequential direction to first respondent, namely, the Secretary, City Civil Court Legal Services Authority (hereafter called, LSA) to place I.A.S.R. No. 6184 of 2006 before Lok Adalat, LSA, Hyderabad, for proper adjudication as directed by this Court in its order, dated 21.06.2007 in W.P. No. 7214 of 2007.2. The factual matrix is as follows. Respondents 2 to 5 herein filed O.S. No. 417 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, against the petitioners, their grandmother and mother. It is for a decree of specific performance of agreement of sale dated 15.12.1998 in respec...