Andhra Pradesh Court February 2010 Judgments

Sri V.G. Constructions Vs. Maytas Infra Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. By this application, filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the applicant prays this Court to appoint a sole Arbitrator and refer the dispute/difference that has arisen between them and the respondent, namely M/s. Maytas Infra Ltd., out of the contract entered into by and between them, to the Arbitrator for adjudication.2. The applicant is a construction company. The respondent, a public limited company is also into construction and development business. The applicant states that the respondent retained them as sub-contractor vide sub-contract agreement dated 28.08.2008 in respect of civil works relating to construction of Warehouses Compex at Malkapur on Hyderabad - Vijayawada, which work was awarded to the respondent by M/s. Maytas Hill County Developers Pvt. Ltd, vide work order dated 18.03.2008.3. The applicant states that as per the sub-contract agreement, they are required to complete the entire work within seven months from t...

Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Sri B.V. Sri ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(2)ALT672

ORDERT. Meena Kumari, J.W.P. No. 25910 of 20091. This writ petition is filed questioning the G.O.Rt. No. 723, Industries and Commerce (M. III) Department, dated 25.11.2009 issued by the Government of A.P., suspending the mining operations of the petitioner-company and others basing on the proceedings of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Hyderabad, dated 6.11.2009, 20.11.2009 and the letter of Sri M.K. Jiwarajka, Member Central Empowered Committee, dated 23.11.2009.2. The case of the writ petitioner reads as follows:The petitioner-company is engaged in the business of mining iron ore pursuant to the validly executed and registered leases in District Anantapur, State of A.P. The petitioner is having three leases over an extent of (1) 25.98 Hectares in Obulapuram Forest Compartment No. 695 (2) 39.5 Hectares in Obulapuram Forest Compartment No. 695 and (3) 68.5 Hectares in Malpangudi Forest Compartment No. 697 and 698. The petitioner-company has the approval for production of fou...

Dr. G. Venkateshwar Rao M.B.B.S., M.D.(Pead) Managing Director and Oth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: Smt. M. Shreesha, Member: Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.206/2006 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that on 19-2-2002 the complainant went to opposite party No.1 hospital for delivery of her second child and the second opposite party performed a major operation and immediately after the delivery, opposite party No.2 also performed tubectomy and she was treated in the same hospital under the supervision of opposite party No.3. Opposite parties issued Birth and Sterilization Certificate dated 19-2-2002 and the complainant submits that she paid an amount of Rs.15,000/- to the opposite parties towards hospital charges and other expenses. On 8-4-2006 she visited the opposite parties for medical check up since she was suffering from stomach pain. Opposite party No.3 conducted tests on the complainant and confirmed that she was one and half months pregnant. The complainant submit...

Fiitjee ( Hyderabad Classes ) Ltd Rep. by Its Managing Director Mr. D. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order : ( as per Sri Syed Abdullah, Honble Member ) The appellants are the unsuccessful opposite partoes in CD. 977/2006 before the District Forum III, Hyderabad where under they were directed to refund Rs.72,000/- to the complainant. Aggrieved by the impugned order this appeal is filed questioning the legality and propriety of the order. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that OP has been running an educational institution to admit the students in the two years integrated course started by the institution. The complainant has attracted to the publicity had joined his son in two years integrated course in July, 2004 with a fond hope that by the coaching his son is secured good rank in FIIT JEE and in IIT course. At the time of admission OP 1 had collected lump sum amount of Rs.1,04,000/- towards for two years integrated course. At the time of admission, the OPs have assured quality of education through expert faculty members. Though the complainant had secured 75% marks in X...

Smt. V. Krishna Veni Vs. M/S Sbi Cards and Payment Services Pvt. Ltd., ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

K. Satyanand, Member: This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant before the District Forum assailing the order of the District Forum that dismissed her complaint. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainant, a government employee, being attracted by the advertisement of opposite parties obtained one credit card and submitted that she was regular in paying the bills even as per the bills issued by opposite parties. She contended that in the month of September, 2006 opposite parties sent a statement requesting the complainant to pay huge amount towards arrears and the complainant submitted that she paid more than the amount demanded towards full and final settlement. But the opposite parties demanded her to pay the amount though there were no dues. Hence she addressed a letter dated 4-1-2006 and requested the opposite parties to close the account but there was no response. Thereafter also the opposite parties without reversal of the wrong debts and wrong bi...

Apollo Nursing Home, Rep. by Dr.Sardarunnisa and Another Vs. V .Rama D ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order(Per Smt.M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.33/2006 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant suffered from severe pain in the abdomen and consulted opposite party No.1 ON 29-6-2005 who advised her to take ultrasound scanning and the report was suggestive of: -CHOLELITHIASIS AND GALL BLADDER POLYP -LEFT RENAL CALCULUS AND CORTYCAL CYST -CBD NORMAL -NO FOCAL LESIONS/IHBD After 2 and half months once again the complainant developed abdominal pain and this time she consulted opposite party No.1 on 15-9-2005 and he advised her to undergo Cholecystectomy. Accordingly the complainant was admitted in opposite party No.1 nursing home and the surgery was performed by opposite party No.2 on 17-9-2005 under general anaesthesia. The complainant submits that opposite party No.2 was engaged by opposite party No.1for performing the said surgery. On the ...

J. Divaker Rao and Others Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India Rep. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral order: Syed Abdullah, Member: These appeals are arising out of the order dated 31.05.2007 in CC 15/2007 by the District Forum, Adilabad. The appellant in FA 840/2007 is the complainant, whereas, the appellants in FA 1648/2007 are the opposite parties. By means of the impugned order the opposite party was directed to pay 25% of the assured amount to the complainant with interest at 9% pa from the date of repudiation of the claim till realization. The appellant in FA 840/2007 has filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation whereas the appellant has questioned the order in directing payment of the insurance claim. It would be convenient to dispose of these appeals by common order. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the complainants wife by name Sulochana Devi during her life had obtained LIC policy vide policy bearing No.682538663. for an assured sum of Rs.50,000/- from OP 1 on 16.3.99. The proposal was accepted after making necessary enquiries. The complainant wa...

Gurijala Chennamma and ors. Vs. Vice-chairman and Managing Director Ap ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT209

ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. These two M.A.C.M.As. arise out of award dated 08-09-2004 in O.P. No. 287 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - District Judge, Ongole (for short 'the Tribunal').2. While M.A.C.M.A. No. 514 of 2006 is filed by the claimants in the O.P. feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation fixed by the Tribunal, M.A.C.M.A. No. 2585 of 2006 is filed by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (A.P.S.R.T.C.) questioning the award of compensation. With the consent of learned Counsel for both the parties, they are heard and the appeals are being disposed of by a common order. For convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the O.P.3. On 08-06-2001, Gurijala Venkataiah (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') along with the Deputy Executive Engineer and some other officials was travelling in jeep bearing No. MH 34F 1314 on official work towards Ongole. When the jeep reached near Katurivaripalem Vil...

Mohd. Ghouse Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Secretary, Agric ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT335

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with proceedings No. Estt. 1(2)784/97, dated 20-9-2000 and set aside the same as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution; to declare the order dated 24-8-2004 passed in O.A. No. 5799 of 2000 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, as being erroneous, perverse and contrary to law and consequently declare the petitioner is entitled to be continued as Watchman with all consequential benefits including difference of pay scale, arrears, etc; also to set aside the proceedings No. ADM(N)A/714/2000/858, dated 28-2-2006 as being wholly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice.2. The facts stated are: The writ petitioner herein was appointed as Wa...

Transport Commissioner, Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. B. B ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT236

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. Since common questions of law are involved in these writ petitions, they are clubbed together and are being disposed of by way of this common order.2. Writ Petition Nos. 2521 and 881 of 2010 are filed by the Officers of the State assailing the legality and validity of the common order dated 17.09.2008 passed in O.A. Nos. 7661 and 848 of 2007 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, (for short, 'the Tribunal') whereby three months time was granted to conclude the disciplinary proceedings by passing final orders, failing which the said proceedings were deemed to have been closed and quashed respectively, as being erroneous, perverse and in excess of jurisdiction.3. Writ Petition No. 1519 of 2010 is filed by the Officers of the State assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 16.03.2009 passed by the Tribunal in M.A. No. 113 of 2009 in O.A. No. 7661 of 2007 whereby the miscellaneous application seeking extension of time to implement the orders...