Andhra Pradesh Court December 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Durga Goud Vs. Perumandla Sumithra and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-08-2010
: 1)Aggrieved by award dated 27.04.2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Medak, this appeal is filed by owner of the accident vehicle contending that the insurance company/5th respondent is liable to indemnify him in terms of Ex.B-3 copy of insurance policy. 2) There is no dispute about factum of road accident which took place on 07.10.1998 at about 10.30 A.M in which the deceased Perumandla Sudershanam @ Darshan riding a cycle was hit by tractor and trailer bearing No.APB 2463 and 2464 in opposite direction in rash and negligent manner and about the tractor and trailer running over his body causing his instantaneous death. Having regard to Ex.A-1 F.I.R, Ex.A-2 inquest panchanama, Ex.A-5 Motor Vehicle Inspector's report and Ex.A-3 charge sheet and also evidence of P.W-2 who is an eye witness to the occurrence, the lower Tribunal rightly found that driver of the accident tractor and trailer was responsible in this accide...
M. Satyanarayana Vs. Smt. P. Indira Devi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2010
ORDER: The petitioner is the defendant in the suit O.S No. 67 of 1998 filed by the respondent - plaintiff on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Anakapalle for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,34,993.80 ps based on a promissory note Ex.A-1 dated 03-12-1995. The petitioner filed written statement taking a plea that the suit pronote is a rank forgery and the signature contained on Ex.A-1 is not of him. Earlier, he filed an application in I.A No. 183 of 1999 for sending Ex. Ex.A-1 to Hand Writing Expert to compare the signature on Ex.A-1 with that of his signatures taken in the open Court on 31- 10-2001. It appears, the Court below allowed the said application and the pronote was sent to the Hand Writing Expert for comparison of the signature on Ex.A-1 pronote with the specimen signatures taken in the open Court on 31-10- 2001. It is stated that the expert submitted a report opining that the signatures taken in the open Court are not tallying with the signature on E...
Boddu Laxmi Rajam Vs. the Singareni Collieries Company Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2010
ORDER: The petitioner joined the service of Singareni Collieries Company Limited, the 1st respondent herein, on 28-10-1975, as Bit Grander. His age was mentioned as 21 years as on the date of joining the duty. The same was reflected in the identity card issued to the petitioner as well as the 'B' register, maintained by the Company. In the year 1996, when the petitioner was being referred to medical examination, the Management mentioned his age as 25 years, as on the date of appointment. Immediately, the petitioner made a representation on 11- 04-1996, pointing out the discrepancy. No steps were taken thereon, in spite of submission of repeated reminders. On 11-08-2009, the petitioner was served with a notice, informing that he would attain the age of superannuation on 01-10- 2010. This was on the basis, that his age as on the date of entering the service was 25 years. The petitioner made a representation once again. He has also approached the Assistant Commissioner of Coal Mines Provi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›