Andhra Pradesh Court January 2010 Judgments

Andhra Bank, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. S ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.713/2006 on the file of District Forum-III, Hyderabad, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant availed gold loan of Rs.18,500/- by pledging gold chain of 42 gms. purchased for Rs.22,000/- in the year 1998 and another chain weighing 24 gms purchased for Rs.14,000/- in the year 2000 together with a necklace purchased in the year 2000 for Rs.27,000/- the net weight being 87 grams on 5.7.2001. The complainant submits that she was paying the interest regularly and on 20.2.2004 when the complainant paid Rs.2000/-, the officials of the opposite party advised the complainant to pay Rs.3000/- more towards the interest to regularize the account. Accordingly on 25.2.2004 the complainant paid the said amount and informed the bank about her change of address. Thereafter the complainant approached the opposite party in February, 2005 for paying the interest but they did not receive it and asked h...

Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Hm and Fw Departm ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(2)ALT187

ORDERVilas V. Afzulpurkar, J.1. This batch of writ petitions is directed against the final order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal dated 13.05.2009 allowing a batch of O.A.'s. Questioning the said order, the State has preferred several writ petitions. The writ petitions involve a common question for adjudication arising out of a common order of the tribunal. Hence, heard and disposed of by this common order.2. When the present batch of cases was heard by us on 27.10.2009, while admitting W.P. No. 23029 of 2009 we had passed the following reasoned order suspending the impugned order.The respondent herein was appointed by the District & Medical Officer, Kurnool as Multi-Purpose Health Assistant (Female) vide order in Proceedings Rc. No. 176/E@/2007, dated 22.10.2008, at Mandal level, purely on contract basis for a period of one year from the date of her joining, and on monthly consolidated pay of Rs. 4,000/-(Pay at Rs. 3000/- + incentive Rs. 1000/- per month). The said appoin...

M/S Professional Couriers, Rep. by Its Branch-in-charge, Vuda Complex ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum-II, Visakhapatnam in C.D.No.969 of 2005. The facts of the case are as follows: The respondent booked a consignment with the appellant for the same to be delivered to the consignee at Delhi. The consignment said to have comprised of a mobile phone worth of Rs.14,850/-, a debit card, cheques and some other important documents. The respondent stated to have exhibited the contents of the consignment to the Manager of the appellant. The consignment was charged a sum of Rs.125/- against the normal charge of Rs.30/-. On being questioned about the variation in the amount the manager of the appellant said to have informed the respondent that the consignment consisted valuable articles and as such heavy amount was charged. The respondent made an enquiry on 9.3.2005 with the appellant for which there was no answer nor any response. The respondent apprehended misuse of mobile phone, debit ...

The Principal, Velagupudi Ramakrishna Siddhartha Engineering College, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) These two appeals one filed by the aggrieved opposite party and the other by the unsatisfied complainant directed against the same order have been taken up for disposal by a common order. The facts that led to filing these two appeals are briefly as follows: The complainant before the District Forum succeeded in the EAMCET 1996 examination and scored rank no.14532. He was allotted seat in the opposite party college on the basis of his caste status as BC A. He claimed to have paid Rs.26,250/- and joined the first year B.Tech course, the classes for which appeared to have commenced with effect from 22-10-1996 whereas the complainant started attending classes four days later. While things stood thus on 25-12-1996 the Commissioner of Technical Education and Convener EAMCET examinations, Hyderabad issued a memo to the complainant through the opposite party alleging that the complainant obtained admission by misrepresenting himself to be belonging to BC A whi...

Sri K.Ananda Pillai Vs. M/S.Musicana, Electronics and Watch Centre, Re ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.311/2006 on the file of Dist. Forum-III, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant, attracted by the representations of the personnel of the opposite party shop, the complainant purchased a DVD player and he was informed that the DVD player is a standard one and they could watch the telugu/tamil and any other films as desired by his wife. The complainant submits that he purchased the subject DVD player on 31.12.2004 for Rs.4,500/- with a warranty of one year from the date of purchase. The DVD player started giving troubles immediately after four days of the purchase and though the complainant informed about the said defects , the opposite party did not rectify any of the defects and DVD player was giving disturbances while watching Tamil songs and while watching Tamil films, the DVD player was totally disturbed and they could not ...

Ratna Mohan Reddy Vs. National Insurance Company Limited, Represented ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Since both these appeals F.A.Nos.724/2007 and F.A.No.725/2007 pertain to common facts they are being disposed of by this common order. F.A.No.724/2007 : Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.5/2006 on the file of District Forum District Forum, Adilabad , the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the case are that the complainant is a forest Beedi Leaf Contractor participating in the tenders called for by the Forest Department every season to collect the beedi leaves from the forest land and insured his unit No.162 with the opposite party for the period from 7.5.2000 to 9.6.2000 for a sum of Rs.25,80,000/- under Fire Policy(Stock in-open) and paid the premium of Rs.5,974/- and the opposite party in turn issued a cover note in favour of the complainant. Between 25.5.2000 to 30.5.2000 there was a torrential rain accompanied by gale which washed away the stocks and the same was informed to the opposite party who appoint...

M.Satya Prabhakara Rao Vs. Global Technologies Represented by Its Auth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.430/2009 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant gave to the opp.party A.M.D. Mother Board of his personal computer-Compaq Company vide Model no.AM 37 L, Serial No.KAL 3213964 for doing some repairs. The opposite party after effecting repairs collected a sum of Rs.470/- and gave a receipt dt. 21.4.09 certifying that Repair Status OK. The complainant submits that even after repair his system was not booting and there was no power supply at all. On 22.4.2009 the complainant reported the same to the opp.party over phone who advised him to bring back the CPU for check up and he accordingly handed over the entire unit of CPU to the opposite party on 24.4.2009. On 25.4.2009 the opposite party sent a message that the CPU was not repaired and instructed the complainant to take back the unit stating that...

M/S.Chunduri Chit Funds Pvt. Limited, Rep. by Its Foreman and Managing ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.160/2004 on the file of District Forum, Krishna-II, Vijaywada the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant joined the opposite party chit group no.JV:2-36 which commenced in June ,2001 for a value of Rs.5 lakhs and monthly instalment being Rs.12,500/- for 40 months. The complainant was regular in payment of instalments and on 30.10.2003 participated in auction no.29 and stood as a highest bidder agreeing to forego Rs.1,18,000/- out of Rs.5 lakhs and hence she was to be paid Rs.3,82,000/-. The complainant completed all the formalities to release the chit prize amount but the opposite parties failed to pay the prize amount of Rs.3,82,000/- except payment of Rs.1,00,000/- and not paid the balance amount of Rs.2,82,000/-. The complainant issued legal notice to the opposite parties and also gave complaint to the Registrar of Chits on 15.6.2004 b...

Golden Liquid Solutions, Rep. by Mr. Vikkrham Saraathy Vs. V.S. Prabha ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.383/2007 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased one Water Softener and RO Water Purifier on 20.6.2005 from the opposite party. The capacity of the softener is based on the horse power of complainants borewell motor which is 1.5 H.P. The opposite party suggested the complainant to go for a 6000 LPH softener to take care of the load. The opposite party assured the complainant that final installation will be done after the complainant moves into his house. Accordingly the order was placed and the payments effected. The supply of the softener was done in June,2005 but the opposite party did not complete the installation till mid January,2006 and on the very first run of the motor and softener, the PVC pipes fixed to the softener broke into pieces and the opposite party took about two ...

Langapothu Praveen Kumar Reddy Vs. Poornima Maternity and Nursing Home ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appeal is filed challenging the order of the District Forum in C.D.No.122 of 2004 whereof the District forum dismissed the complaint holding that the appellant failed to produce documentary evidence that the opposite parties committed deficiency in service in regard to providing treatment for the fractured hip of the appellant. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant underwent surgery for fracture to his left hip and thigh in the month of November 1999. The appellant was treated as inpatient in the respondent no.1 hospital for the period from 1.11.1999 to 4.12.1999 during the course of which period operation was performed by a group of doctors on 13.11.1999 in the respondent no.1 hospital where the implants were removed by the doctors later in the month of August 2001. After the implants were removed the appellant reported pain and difficulty in walking. The doctors in the respondent no.1 hospital advised for physio...