Andhra Pradesh Court August 2009 Judgments

Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri K. Satyanand, Member .) This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties assailing the order of the District Forum granting relief to the consumer complainant. The facts of the case briefly stated are as follows: The complainant installed a tyre and retreading unit at Seethampeta near Kattipudi taking loan from A.P.State Financial Corporation and also investing otherwise. He applied for three phase supply of energy for the said unit by a letter dated 7-3-2001 to the opposite parties which are functionaries at four levels of A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited. Thereupon the third opposite party informed the complainant to deposit an amount of Rs.16,930/- representing 10% supervision charges towards Quality Control on execution of work on Turn Key and an amount of Rs.10,340/- towards development charges and further amount of Rs.10,000/- towards security deposit. Accordingly the complainant claimed to have deposited the total amount of Rs.37,270/-. H...

The Divisional Electrical Engineer, A.P. Transco, A.P.E.P.D.C.L, Eluru ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: ( Honble Justice Sri D. Appa Rao, President) The learned counsel for the petitioner endorsed on the petition that the matter is not pressed. In view of the said endorsement petition is dismissed as withdrawn, consequently appeal is rejected. The learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant requested that the amount deposited by way of statutory amount be transmitted to the District Forum, West Godavari , Eluru in order to enable the appellant to comply the order passed by the District Forum. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the same....

P. Yashoda Vs. Lok Adalat at Kurnool, District Legal Services Authorit ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT141

ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. Petitioner seeks a Writ of Certiorari calling for records in relation to impugned Award dated 08.12.2006 passed by the Lok Adalat, Kurnool in C.C. No. 634 of 2005 on the file of the Honourable Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kurnool and quash the same as it is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Section 320(2) Cr.P.C. and to direct the Honourable Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kurnool to proceed with the trial in C.C. No. 634 of 2005 against the accused/ respondents 2 and 3 herein.2. It appears that one Ch. Uma Lakshmi, w/o. Yogeshwar Raju, r/o. Beechupalli, Mahabubnagar District, filed a private complaint on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kurnool and the said Court referred the matter for investigation by the police. Accordingly, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kurnool, IV Town Police Station, investigated the matter and filed a charge sheet for the offence under Sections 406, 417 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pe...

Ch. Rajalingam Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Principal ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT591

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Sri Ch. Rajalingam s/o. Rajaiah, Sarpanch, Korkishala filed W.P. No. 12066/2009 praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for records of 3rd respondent in proceedings No. 1255/A.2/ 2009-6, dated 1-6-2009 purporting to cancel the cheques power with regard to the BRGF funds while issuing show cause notice to the petitioner to show cause why action could not be initiated against him under the provisions of Panchayat Raj Act and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and to pass such other suitable orders. This Court issued rule nisi on 19-6-2009 and granted interim suspension in W.P.M.P. No. 15562 of 2009.2. The said writ petitioner also filed W.P. No. 14208 of 2009 praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for records of the 3rd respondent in proceedings No. 1255/A2/2009-8, dated 20-6-2009 purporting to cancel the cheques power with regard to the SFC, TSF...

G. Narender Vs. the Person in Charge, Ngo Cooperative House Building S ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.166/2004 on the file of District Forum, Mahabubnagar the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is a retired non gazetted officer and member of N.G.O Cooperative House Building Society which is the opposite party herein and on his application dt.7.6.1983 the Secretary of opposite party society allotted plot no.408 in MIGH-1 admeasuring 240 sq. yards in Phase II of NGOs Colony, Mahabubnagar. Allotment was made through lot system held on 13.3.1983 and he paid Rs.3,000/- on 4.6.1986 and Rs.3,360/- on 24.7.1986 towards land and land development cost . The complainant also paid another sum of Rs.2,400/- towards other charges. But the opposite party did not give possession of the said plot inspite of repeated requests and on 4.11.2004 he also made application to the opposite party and expressed his willingness to pay the balance amount. The opposit...

Dr.Gopalakrishna Sinha and Another Vs. M/S.New India Insurnace Company ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

ORAL ORDER: (Per Honble Sri K. Satyanand, Member .) The unsuccessful complainants filed this appeal assailing the order of the District Forum dismissing their complaint. The facts of the case briefly stated are as follows: The complainant No.2 is the wife of complainant No.1. Both of them purchased a Medi-claim insurance policy from the opposite party and it has been in force since the year 1995. The second complainant developed Arthritis of both knees during the year 2003 and consulted a doctor by name, Mr.T.V.Ramana Murthy, a Specialist in Orthopedics. He advised total replacement of the knee. Accordingly the first complainant admitted her in Hurkisondas Nurrotamdas Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai for the said operation which was performed and in that process the complainants claimed to have incurred an expenditure of Rs.2,70,940/-. After the operation, the complainants filed a claim before the opposite party on 31-12-2003 for reimbursement of the medical expenses. Soon the oppo...

The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. R. Ramchandra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: (Per Sri SYED ABDULLAH ,Honble Member) A joint memo is filed by the appellant and respondent counsel stating that both parties have settled the matter out of court and the respondent has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of the claim. It is represented that the appellant had already deposited Rs.3,00,000/- earlier and the balance of Rs.2,00,000/- is being deposited now through D.D.bearing No.864136 dated 28-7-2009 for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. In view of the joint memo, the appeal is disposed of as settled out of court. There shall be no order as to costs....

Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds, Company Limited Vs. Pothuraju Srinivasa Rao ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.165/2001 on the file of District Forum, Khammam , opposite party no.2 preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased 5 packets of Mahyco F 1 Tejaswini Chilli seed on 15.5.2001 from opposite party no.1 and sown the same in his acre of land. He was expecting 20 quintals for half acre as per the words of the opposite party. But there was no germination at all. The complainant submits that the opposite party no.1 visited his field and promised to inform the manufacturer but there was no response. Hence the complaint seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay Rs.80,000/- toward compensation for 20 quintals @ Rs.4000/- per quintal . Opposite party no.2 filed written version denying that they never informed the complainant that he would receive 40 quintals per acre i.e. 20 quintals for acre from his crop. The complainant has not filed the land record...

Shaik Mohd. HussaIn S/O Sk. Madar Sahab, A.P. State Wakf Board Vs. A.P ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(5)ALT350

ORDERSanjay Kumar, J.1. Successive disciplinary enquiries and denial of subsistence allowance during his suspension from service drove the appellant herein to file W.P.No.27527 of 2008 before this Court. By order dated 18.12.2008 the learned single Judge dismissed the said writ petition, giving rise to the present appeal.2. The appellant is a Junior Assistant/Inspector Auditor in the service of the A.P. State Wakf Board (for short, 'the Board'), Hyderabad, the respondent herein. He was placed under suspension by order dated 27.04.2006 in connection with the issuance of a No Objection Certificate (for short, 'NOC') in respect of the land in, Sy. No. 141 Ongole, Prakasam District. After three changes of the Enquiry Officer, show-cause notice dated 04.12.2006 was issued to the appellant calling for his explanation. The appellant submitted his explanation on 30.12.2006. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 03.01.2007 holding that the land in Sy. No. 141 was not a wakf land and th...

Mohd. Ashrar Ahmed Shareef and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by District ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(5)ALT403

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The appellants are the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 1974 of 2001 filed in the Court of X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. They pleaded that they purchased the suit schedule property comprised in municipal No. 9-4-110/3/107 of Virasat Nagar, Sheikpet, Towlichowki admeasuring 535 sq. yds. According to them, the property was a part of the land in Section No. 148/2 of Sheikpet revenue village. The appellants traced their title to the property and pleaded that a house is existing thereon. They pleaded that the respondents are trying to dispossess them without recourse to due process of law.2. A written statement is filed on behalf of the respondents. An objection was taken on the ground that notice under Section 80 C.P.C., was not issued. It was pleaded that the land is part of the tank bed known as Satham Cheruvu in Section No. 195/1 of Sheikpet village. They have explained in detail, the various proceedings including O.S. No. 592 of 1999 pending in the C...