Andhra Pradesh Court June 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.S. Bali and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Chief Secretary and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-02-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT49
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In this batch of eight writ petitions, the validity of memo, dated 21.05.2005, issued by the Government of A.P., in its Revenue Department, is challenged. In addition to that, G.O.Ms. No. 1084, dated 06.06.2005, issued by the Government in exercise of power under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, as it then existed, is challenged in two writ petitions, viz., W.P. Nos. 22619 of 2007 and 7747 of 2008.2. The petitioner in W.P. No. 10084 of 2006 claims to be the representative of some of the legal descendants of late Nawab Nusrat Jung-I, and those in the other writ petitions, claim to be the descendants themselves.3. The brief facts that gave rise to filing of these writ petitions, as stated by the petitioners, are as under:Mohammed Nizamuddin Khan, titled as, Nawab Nusrat Jung Bahadur-I (hereinafter referred to as 'the Nawab') purchased an extent of 1635 acres of land at Asad Nagar, which, since came to be known as 'Kokapet Village' in the surroundings o...
T. Sarath Chandra Reddy Vs. Margadarsi Chit Funds Limited and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT37
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court ordered notice before admission on 31-12-2008 and granted interim stay for a limited period, which is being extended from time to time.2. The first respondent filed C.R.P.M.P. No. 2260 of 2009 praying for the relief of vacating the interim stay granted by this Court on 31-12-2008.3. The learned Counsel representing the parties, at this stage, made a request for final disposal of the civil revision petition and hence, the same itself is heard finally by this Court.4. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/defendant No. 1 against the order, dated 24-11-2008 made in I.A. No. 1388 of 2008 in O.S. No. 3 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool.5. Sri Y. Ashok Raj, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioner, would maintain that in the facts and circumstances, since it is a clear case of lack of territorial jurisdiction instead of driving the parties to let in evidence on all the issues, it would have b...
M. Vijay Kumar and anr. Vs. Chapala Narsimha and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT651
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 11-06-2007 passed by the Joint Collector and Additional District Magistrate, Mahabubnagar, the 5th respondent herein. The facts, that are relevant for this writ petition, are as under:2. The petitioners are pattadars of land in Sy. Nos. 245 and 259 of Farooq Nagar village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, admeasuring Ac.20.00 and Ac.3.34 guntas, respectively. According to them, these survey numbers are carved out of old Sy. Nos. 206 and 266/2, respectively.3. It is stated that Chapala Yellaiah, the grand-father of respondents 1 to 4 and 7 (for short 'the contesting respondents'), was recognized as protected tenant, in respect of Ac. 15.35 guntas, in Sy. No. 245, and that the respondents have been pursuing their remedy under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short 'the Tenancy Act) for grant of ownership certificate under Section 38-E of that Act. They filed an application unde...
Nakka Perumal Reddy and ors. Vs. Pandiripilli Lakshmi Prasad and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)ALT779
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals arise out of execution proceedings in O.S. No. 149 of 1985 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. The appellants are different, but the respondents are common to both the appeals.2. The appellants and certain others were said to be in possession of small extents of land, forming part of an area of 50 cents in Sy. No. 4/7 of Gopalapatnam Revenue Village, owned by Pandiripilli Madhava Rao, the father of the 1st respondent. When they apprehended that they would be evicted from the sites in their possession, they filed O.S. No. 325 of 1985 in the Court of VII Additional District Munsif, Visakhapatnam, for the relief of perpetual injunction. Madhava Rao, in turn, filed O.S.IMo.149 of 1985 in the Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam, against 13 defendants, including the appellants herein, for recovery of possession of the entire extent of 50 cents. During the pendency of the suits, M...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›