Andhra Pradesh Court June 2009 Judgments

Nasayam Mohammed Feroz, S/O Mohd. Farook and Two ors. Vs. Vijetha Agro ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2009]152CompCas559(AP)

ORDERNooty Ramamohana Rao, J.1. This is an application taken out by 3 individuals Viz: Sri Nasayam Mohammed Feroz, S/o Mohd. Farook, Sri Pasapoina Nageswara Rao, S/o China Venkata Swamy and Sri Arimandla Veera Reddy, S/o Rami Reddy, seeking directions for releasing the property bearing D. No. 12-25-12, Ganeshwar Rao Street (Sivalyam Street), Kothapet, Guntur from the custody/possession of the Official Liquidator attached to this Court.2. M/s. Vijetha Agro Farms India Limited is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act having its registered office at Vijetha Complex, Sivalayam street, Kothapet, Guntur. One of the principal objectives for which the company came to be established was to develop agro farms and agro based industries and products. It has mobilized funds by way of collection of deposits for the purpose of developing agro farms at various places. The company also acquired an open plot admeasuring 813 sq. yards through four different sale deeds be...

Vrs and Yrn College Rep. by Secretary and Correspondent Vs. the Commis ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT359

ORDERNooty Ramamohana Rao, J.1. The writ petitioner is a reputed degree college at Chirala. It is aggrieved of an order passed by the Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education proposing to recover the monies paid to it by the State Government towards salary and allowances that were in turn paid to the 3rd respondent for the period beyond January 1997 up to December 2000, when he had worked as the Principal of the said college. The 3rd respondent was initially recruited as a Demonstrator in the writ petitioner college and subsequently, came to be appointed as a Lecturer. He had been serving the institution from August 1963 onwards. Since the writ petitioner institution is one of the institutions, which maintains and achieved excellence in the field of education, the State Government had admitted various posts, both teaching and non-teaching in the said college, to grant-in-aid. Indisputably, the post of Principal being so pre-eminent position in a degree college was also admitte...

Andhra Pradesh Forest Development Corporation Limited Rep. by Regional ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(7)ALT726

B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10.08.1998 passed in O.S. No. 955 of 1991 on the file of IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil Judge decreed the suit and appointed an arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences in respect of agreement dated 14.02.1990.2. Facts in a nutshell necessary for appreciating the question involved in this appeal may be stated: Goddila Chinnappa Reddy-plaintiff is an agriculturist carrying on agriculture in plantation of props of Eucalyptus at Vanamaladinne village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District. He sought the services of the A.P. Forest Development Corporation for marketing Eucalyptus props. An agreement dated 14.02.1990 came to be executed between the parties. Some disputes arose regarding payment of amount for the props supplied by the plaintiff. Since the agreement dated 14.02.1990 contained an arbitration cla...

P. Sankeerh Mouli and ors. Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological Universi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(15)ALT612

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. The petitioners in these writ petitions are the students of Engineering Course in different colleges affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University and all the writ petitions are filed aggrieved by the action of the University in not permitting the petitioners to appear for the examinations on the ground of shortage of attendance. Since all the petitioners are similarly situated and a common question of law arises for consideration, these writ petitions are heard together and decided by this common order.2. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (for short, 'JNTU') is established and incorporated in the State of Andhra Pradesh under Section 3 of Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Act, 1972 (for short, 'the Act').3. In exercise of the powers conferred under paragraph-7(d) of Part-II of the Schedule to the Act, the Academic Senate of the University made Academic Regulations. Section 6 of the said Regulations which deals with the attendance runs as ...

P. Sambasiva Rao S/O Ramakataiah Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT68

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. The 2nd respondent - Vijayawada Municipal Corporation -issued Tender-cum-Auction Notice dated 30.06.2008 inviting tenders for grant of leasehold rights in respect of vacant shops in different commercial complexes situated within the area of operation of Vijayawada Municipal Corporation. Shop No. 7/A situated in the ground floor of Jerimella Satyanarayana Complex was one among the shops included in the said Tender-cum-Auction Notice. The petitioner submitted his tender in respect of the said Shop No. 7/A duly making deposit of Rs. 5,000/-prescribed in the tender notice.2. The auction was held on 10.7.2008 in which the petitioner offered Rs. 1,97,000/- as goodwill and Rs. 1,800/- towards rent per month. One V. Venkateswara Rao offered Rs. 1,98,000/- as goodwill and Rs. 1,500/- towards rent per month. Thereafter, the Standing Committee of the 1st respondent Corporation met on 30.7.2008 and accepted the petitioner's tender for Shop No. 7/A. The same was informed to the...

Kotha Dhanalakshmi Vs. Bandi Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT66

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner presented a plaint on 26.09.2003, in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa against the respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,46,200/- on the strength of two promissory notes, dated 18.02.1998 and 10.05.1998. It was given S.R. No. 6059 of 2003. The trial Court, through its order, dated 14.10.2003, rejected the plaint on the ground that the suit claim was barred by limitation. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed C.M.A. No. 16 of 2004 in the Court of the III Additional District Judge, Kadapa. The C.M.A. was dismissed on 19.04.2005. Hence, this civil revision petition.2. Sri S.V. Bhatt, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent initiated proceedings under the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (for short 'the Act') by filing I.P. No. 13 of 1999 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa. He contends that on dismissal of the I.P., A.S. No. 65 of 2003 was filed in the Court of the Principal District Judge, ...

Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. Vs. P. Vengal Rao and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2009AP196

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. An arbitration has taken place between the petitioner and the respondents in relation to a commercial transaction. An Arbitrator from Chennai was chosen and he passed an award, dated 06.04.2001 for a sum of Rs. 17,63,255/- in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an execution petition before the Court of the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam with a prayer to transfer the decree to the Court of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. It was alleged that the respondents own several items of property within the jurisdiction of the District Court, Ranga Reddy District. The learned District Judge passed an order, dated 17.06.2002, refusing to entertain the execution petition, on the ground that it has no jurisdiction. The same is challenged in this civil revision petition.2. Sri K. Someswar Kumar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Court of the Principal District Judge answers the description of 'Cour...

Heights Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Director ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(5)ALT818

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. The petitioners herein are Advertising Agencies, who have been undertaking jobs of publishing advertisements, creative art works and other related works. Having been registered with Indian Newspapers Society (INS), they were also empanelled as the Advertising Agencies of the 2nd respondent - South Central Railway w.e.f. 1998, 2004 and 2000 respectively for undertaking its works of advertisements.2. It is not in dispute that pursuant to the said empanelment, the petitioners are handling the creative publicity campaigns, release of advertisements and production of other publicity related works of the South Central Railways and they have been continuing as such till date.3. While so, the second respondent published a notification dated 31.05.2009 inviting applications from advertising agencies for fresh empanelment prescribing the following minimum eligibility criteria:1. The agency should be 'fully accredited' with the INS for the last three years as on the date of o...

Malyala Venkata Ramanamurthy Vs. the Director of Insurance and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order ( As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The appellant is the unsuccessful complainant. The District Forum dismissed his complaint in C.D.No.217 of 2004 on the grounds that the appellant failed to submit any proposal for issue of insurance policy under APGLIC Scheme. The factual matrix as stated in the complaint is that the appellant joined in government service as UDC in the office of the respondent no.3 and worked there till February 2001. Subsequently he was transferred to the College of Nursing, Visakhapatnam on promotion as Superintendent and having put up the rest of his service there the appellant was retired at Visakhapatnam. Insurance policy under APGLIC scheme is compulsory for government servants and during the year 1987-88 the appellant obtained insurance policy, GPF NO.24853-Medical whereby Rs.64/- was deducted every month from his salary by the drawing and disbursing officer, the respondent no.3 remitted to the respondents no.1 and 2. The appellant was not give...

Creamline Dairy Products Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director, K. Bhask ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order ( As per R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) This appeal is filed against the order of the District Forum-I, Hyderabad passed on 3.3.2006 in C.D.No.555 of 2005. The factual matrix as seen from the complaint is that the respondent, an unemployee used to buy milk from the respondent by paying the required cost to the appellant in advance or at the time of purchasing the milk. The respondent used to sell the milk in Raichur on marginal profit for the purpose of his livelihood. On 7.2.2002 the respondent deposited an amount of Rs.25,000/- with the appellant towards deposit for distributorship for Raichur City. The respondent had closed his business on 31.7.2004 due to non-cooperative attitude of the appellant. The respondent had to bear the transportation charges including diesel chares. The respondent used to engage different vehicles for transportation of the milk to Raichur an other areas. The respondent used to reimburse the appellant the transportation charges whenever the appe...