Andhra Pradesh Court March 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Heritage Estate and Holdings Rep. by Its Managing Director and anr. Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT371
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The 1st petitioner is a Private Limited Company. It purchased Ac.5.08 guntas of land in Sy. Nos. 574 and 575 of Alwal Village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, through two sale deeds, dated 29-07-2006. The land was originally held by M/s Ghulam Ahmed and 10 others. A declaration under Section 6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act (for short 'the Act') was filed by Ghulam Ahmed and others, in respect of various extents of land, held by them, including the one, mentioned above. After processing the declaration, the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, the 1st respondent, passed an order dated 30-01-1996, holding that the declarants do not have any land in excess of ceiling limits, under the Act.2. Seven years thereafter, the 1st petitioner approached the Government, the 2nd respondent, stating that the land declared by Ghulam Ahmed and others was sold in favour of M/s. Nava Bharath Co-operative Housing Society Limited...
B. Bhanu Murthy Vs. P. Rama Subrahmanyam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)ALT100
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. In C.M.P. No. 4691/2008, this Court granted interim suspension. CMP. No. 7201/2008 is filed praying for vacation of the interim suspension.2. When the matter is coming up before this Court under the caption 'Interlocutory', the Counsel on record made a request for disposal of the Civil Revision Petition itself and thus this Civil Revision Petition itself is being disposed of finally by this Court after hearing the Counsel on record.3. The Revision Petitioner also filed reply affidavit in CRP.M.P. No. 7201/2008.4. Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, the learned Counsel representing the Revision Petitioner would maintain that the learned II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram failed to consider that it is an established cardinal principle of law through a catena of decisions that while interpreting Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as 'Code' for the purpose of convenience) an order of attachment cannot straightaway be made...
G. Ranga Reddy Vs. the District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)ALT425
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The 5th respondent filed a revision under Section 166-B of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli (for short 'the Act') before the District Revenue Officer, Warangal District, the 3rd respondent herein, with a prayer to rectify the entries in respect of the land in Sy.No.145 of Guruvanpet Village, Cherial Mandal, Warangal District for the years 1975-76 to 2001-02. For the said period, the entries were in the name of the petitioner herein, vis-a-vis the said land. The 3rd respondent took up the revision, issued notice to the petitioner, and passed an order, dated 08-02-2008, directing rectification of the entries, as prayed for by the 5th respondent. The same is challenged in this writ petition.2. It is urged that the revision under Section 166-B of the Act is not the remedy for rectification of the entries in the revenue records, and the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short 'the R.O.R. Act') is a comprehensive enactme...
V. Seenaiah Vs. Executive Engineer (Housing), Warangal Division and or ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)ALT666
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. On 19-11-2002, while admitting the Civil Revision Petition, in CM.P. No. 22235/2002 interim stay had been granted. C.M.P. No. 4377/2008 is filed by the 1st respondent in the Civil Revision Petition praying for vacation of the said interim stay.2. Though the matter is coming under the caption 'Interlocutory', at the request of the Counsel on record, the Civil Revision Petition itself had been taken up for final hearing and thus the same is being disposed of finally.3. Sri K.V. Satyanarayana, the learned Counsel representing the Revision Petitioner had pointed out to the relevant provisions of A.P. Housing Board Act 1956 (in short hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience) and would maintain that the order made by the Primary Authority being not in accordance with law, the mere fact that certain reasons had been recorded by the Appellate Authority may not cure this initial defect and hence the order which is being challenged cannot be sustai...
Jai Jangannath Gases Pvt. Ltd. Rep by Its Managing Director Sri B.S. R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-03-2009
Reported in: (2009)25VST535(AP)
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. The petitioner, a small scale industrial unit engaged in the business of production of oxygen gas and effecting sales thereof duly filling it in cylinders, obtained the final eligibility certificate, under G.O. Ms. No. 108 dated 20.05.1996, on 15.06.1999. The said certificate entitled the petitioner to claim the benefit of sales tax holiday for Rs. 1,33,73,140/- for a period of seven years from 11.02.1999 till 10.02.2006, apart from other incentives. Clause 11 (vi) thereof disentitled the petitioner from collecting sales tax from its consumers and required it, in case it collected sales tax during the availed period of sales tax exemption, to remit the sales tax collected by it to the government.Placing reliance on the circular memo issued by the Commissioner of Industries dated 17.05.2000, purporting to withdraw the tax holiday for industrial gases etc., the 1st respondent issued show cause notice dated 29.07.2000 proposing to assess the petitioner herein...
Nukalapati Venku Reddy (Died) and ors. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-03-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)ALT467
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The revision and appeal are interconnected. Hence, they are heard together. Briefly stated, the facts that gave rise to them are:Sri Venkaiah Swamy was born at Nagulavellatur of Nellore District in the early years of 20th Century. Up to 20 years of age, his life was almost ordinary. At about that age, he went in to forest and spent a secluded and isolated life for about 30 years, doing penance. He surfaced thereafter with vast spiritual powers. Within a short time, many people were attracted by his teachings, and became his disciples. Over the time he came to be known as, Bhagwan Venkaiah Swamy. He went around many places, and at a later stage, made Golagamidi Village of Venkatachalam Mandal, Nellore District, as his abode.2. An Ashram was established, and ultimately Bhagwan Sri Venkaiah Swamy attained Nirvana, on 28-08-1982. His Samadhi was developed into a place of worship. The maintenance thereof was not so much organized, though his disciples and devotees u...
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Vs. Ke ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-03-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)ALT260
ORDERG. Bhavani Prasad, J.1. The insurer filed the petition for review of the judgment, dated 12-10-2007 in C.M.A. No. 380 of 2006.2. The review petitioner desires to have the judgment reviewed on the ground of the assessment of loss having to be confined to the supervisory capacities only and the contribution by the deceased having to be assessed at a much lower level than two-thirds of the income in case of an agriculturist and a business man. The reliance placed by the Court on the charge-sheet also has to be reconsidered and hence, the review petition relying on the precedents cited by the learned Counsel for the review petitioner in the grounds of review and his written submissions.3. Sri Kota Subba Rao, learned Counsel for the review petitioner in his oral and written arguments desired preference to be given to Ex.A-2 first information report but not Ex.A-1 charge-sheet and when the deceased was not getting any salary, the income from business and agriculture has to be assessed w...
L.V.V. Satyanarayana S/O. Venkata Rao Vs. the A.P. Eastern Power Distr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-02-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)ALT374
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. The petitioner joined the service in the erstwhile A.P. State Electricity Board on 08.12.1979 as Helper. He was promoted as Instrument Mechanic (Grade-III) on 29.01.1998, as a Tester (Grade-II) on 03.03.1999 and as a Tester (Grade-I) on 01.07.2005. Presently he is working as Tester (Grade-I) under the control of the Divisional Engineer, Transformers, the A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Company limited, Eluru, West Godavari District-3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent issued Memo. No. DE/M&P;/ELR/ JAO/ADM/UDC/D. No. 449/07, dated 17.12.2007, whereunder the petitioner was informed that his pay was wrongly fixed in the cadre of Instrument Mechanic (Grade-II) and sought to recover excess payment made to him. He was informed that the Tester Instrument Mechanic (Gr.-III) and the Tester Instrument Mechanic (Grade-II) were brought under common pay scale with effect from 01.04.1998 and therefore, fixation of his pay in the cadre of Instrument Mechanic (Grade-II) t...
P. Dasthagiri S/O. Subbarayudu, Vs. Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-02-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)ALT278
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. As common issues are involved in all the four writ petitions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited-1st respondent issued notification dated 6.10.2006 inviting applications for the post of Sub-Engineers/Electrical in various operation circles spread over the districts of Anantapur, Kurnool, Mahaboobnagar, Medak, Hyderabad and Ranga Reddy Districts on yearly contract basis. The petitioners responded to the notification and appeared for the written test held on 4.2.2007. They became successful in the written examination and appeared for viva. Some of the petitioners got intimation with regard to their provisional selection and they were asked to furnish the original certificates on or before 6.3.2007 and accordingly they submitted their certificates. While so, the 1st respondent Distribution Company in the meeting held on 14.5.2007 resolved to give preference to t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›