Andhra Pradesh Court November 2009 Judgments

Smt.Lavudiya Rukkamma Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order : (Per Smt. M.Shreesha, Honble Member ) Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum in C.D.No.102/2005 on the file of Dist.Forum, Karimnagar, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the mother of one Mr.L.Roopsingh who has discharged his duties as School Attender and his Department made him take two LIC policies for Rs.50,000/- each and besides these two policies the complainant had himself taken two policies for Rs.1 lakh each on 28.9.2002 . Before issuance of the second policies the life assured was transferred on 19.6.2002 to ZPSS, Jagasagar of Medpally Mandal from Zilla Parishad School, Karimnagar. As the complainants son was not desirous to join at Jaggasagar, he obtained sick leave on the ground that he was suffering from jaundice. On 31.10.2002 after his long sick leave his transfer orders were cancelled and he was posted at ZPPSS, Venkapalli. While he was working as school attender in the said sc...

M.Seshadri Vasa Vs. Magalipuri Kishore Kumar and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) These two appeals arise out of the same subject matter that came to be adjudicated in C.D.No.72/2003 on the file of District Forum, Srikakulam. The facts that led to filing these two appeals are briefly as follows: The complainant claiming to have been motivated by opposite parties 1 and 2 placed an order with opposite party No.2 for the purchase of Offset Master Mini Printing machine of 45 x 20 size centralized lubrication for an amount of Rs.2,85,000/-. The said deal was confirmed by a document signed mutually by the complainant on one hand and the representative of the manufacturer, opposite party no.2 on the other as per Ex.A9. It is pertinent to point out that opposite party no.1(appellant) is not a party to the said confirmation. The complainant claimed to have paid a total amount of Rs.1,50,000/- to opposite party no.2 for the supply of the machinery for which he placed order with opposite party no.2. A further amount was outstanding due to oppos...

Sriperumbudhuri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy and Others Vs. Sri Pappala Aru ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appeal is filed challenging the order of the District Forum-I, Visakhapatnam. Briefly stated the facts of the case as narrated in the complaint are that the husband of the third respondent and father of the appellants no.1 and 2 entered into an agreement for development of property belonging to the husband of the third respondent with the father of the fourth respondent in the month of April 1999. The father of the fourth respondent entered into construction agreement with appellants no.1 to 3 and with the mother of the appellant no.4 for construction of flats in the land belonging to the father of the respondents no.1 and 2 and husband of respondent tno.3. The fourth appellant acquired the flat by virtue of a will deed executed by her mother late Bankapalli Ammanna Vimala. The first appellant opted for the flat in second floor for a consideration of Rs.3,31,500/-, the appellants no.2 and 3 ...

Alla Subba Rao and Others Vs. Pavuluri Adinarayana

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainants assailing the order of the District Forum and seeking the grant of relief sought in the complaint. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainants are agriculturists. They claimed to have purchased Bengal gram seeds from the opposite party described as a dealer in seeds. It seems they raised Bengal gram crop sowing the said seeds. Though there was germination and growth as it came to fruition, the crop appeared to have totally failed giving a very low yield delivering a financial blow to the farmers. As such the farmers felt that the acutely low yield was due to the defect in the seeds and therefore they gave a complaint to the Collector and the Grievance cell but with no avail. The farmers therefore filed the present complaint. The opposite party resisted the complaint totally repudiating the very assertion that he sold seeds to the complainants. In support of their case, the comp...

Racharla Srinivasa Vs. Smt.Kuchana Saritha and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (as per Sri K.Satyanand, Honble Member) These I.As., are filed by the Managing Partner of Yada Chit Funds seeking leave of this Commission to maintain the appeals in his personal capacity. The reasons attributed to resorting to this line of action appeared to be that though he was the Managing Partner of the firm in question at the time of the transaction which admittedly extended up to some time before his retirement in August, 2003, subsequently, he resigned from the partnership and ceased to be the Managing Partner. It is further contended that in as much he is being continued as representing the firm, the liability that was adjudicated in the C.D. would remain burdening him in his personal capacity and therefore it could be got rid of only by filing an appeal in his personal capacity. This plea of the petitioner is utterly untenable as a third party customer of the firm in question has got every right to maintain a complaint against the firm as it was represented at th...

M/S.Sri Balaji Cotton Traders (Complainant) Rep. by Its Proprietor, Pa ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand, Honble Member) Dis-satisfied with the quantum and pattern of relief granted by the District Forum, the complainant preferred this appeal obviously for enhanced relief in terms of their prayer. The complainant is a proprietorship business firm dealing in cotton. The complainant obtained a fire floater policy for Rs.10,00,000/- for cotton stock stores at two locations specified therein. The policy issued to the complainant was valid from 12-3-2005 to 11-6-2005. On 20-4-2005, there was fire accident in the location No.1, namely, Suryadevara Seshaiah and Co. and cotton kappas worth Rs.10,00,000/- were gutted in a fire accident. The matter was immediately informed to the fire department as also to the first opposite party. The fire office issued a certificate. The first opposite party sent a surveyor to estimate the loss. The surveyor estimated the loss at Rs.3,00,000/- though it was alleged that the complainant had submitted documents proving loss to a tune of Rs.9,00,0...

Gangula Nikila Kantha Vs. Dr. Ntr University of Health Sciences and or ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT48

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner joined I year of MBBS course, during the academic year 2006-07 in Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar District (for short 'PIMS'). She completed I year, in that college. However, on account of health problems faced by her, she wanted to be transferred to Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, the 3rd respondent herein. Both the colleges are affiliated to Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, the 1st respondent herein. As required under the Regulations framed by the Medical Council of India, the 2nd respondent herein, the petitioner submitted applications to the 1st and 3rd respondents and PIMS, the college in which she joined; duly enclosing the medical certificates and the opinion of the Medical Board etc. PIMS gave 'No Objection Certificate', on 7-4-2008, and on the next day, the 3rd respondent issued such a certificate. Based on the same, the 1st respondent issued 'Conditional No Objection Certificate', on 17-6-20...

Kattamaneni Lakshmi Poornachandra Rao Alias Gandhi, Chairman, Sri Sai ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Counsel for petitioner filed a memo stating that the matter has been settled out of court. In terms thereof, this petition and F.A(SR)156/2009 are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs....

Lagisetty Pandiah Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) Not satisfied with the quantum of relief granted by the District Forum, the complainant preferred this appeal obviously to get complete relief as prayed for. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant while proceeding on a foreign tour obtained an insurance policy coverage from the opposite party obviously in order to cover any unforeseen ailment that might set in the far off lands. He obtained the policy valid from 13-5-2005 to 10-8-2005 for various packages including the one for medical expenses for a coverage upto 50,000 US dollars. It seems after going to US, he fell ill due to some Hepatitis C for which he claimed to have taken treatment from the medical attendants there. He claimed to have spent an amount of Rs.99,600/- towards the medical expenses. After getting back to India, he filed a claim for reimbursement of the medical expenses that he incurred in U.S. by way of a claim form received by the opposite pa...

S. Thrilochana Rao and Another Vs. Jonnala Naresh

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

D. Appa Rao, President: Oral: 1. These three appeals are preferred by the Chairman and Managing Director and a partner of Sree Raja Rajeswara Finance and Investments, the opposite parties/JDRs, against the order of the Dist. Forum issuing NBWs for recovery of the amount covered under the FDRs without inquiry as contemplated under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act. 2. Though separate orders were passed in each of these appeals filed by appellants, in the light of the fact that a common question of fact and law have arisen, we deem it fit that a common order can be passed in all these appeals. The facts of one of the cases viz., C.C. No. 256/2002 are taken as representative sample of all other cases to avoid confusion. 3. The complainants filed the complaints for recovery of amount covered under the FDRs issued by Sree Raja Rajeswara Finance and Investments Company. They impleaded the Chairman and Managing Director and a partner as opposite party Nos.1 and 2. Since they did not c...