Andhra Pradesh Court September 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Nadipalloi Varakrupa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)ALT135
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri M.S. Ramachandra Rao, learned Counsel representing the revision petitioners - Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, represented by its Additional General Manager, Hyderabad and others and Sri Jayanthi S.C. Sekhar, learned Counsel representing the respondent in CRP No. 2222 of 2004.2. Sri M.S. Ramachandra Rao, learned Counsel representing the revision petitioners had pointed out to the orders impugned in the civil revision petitions and would maintain that the learned II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, had totally erred in granting interest at 9% per annum on the compensation from the date of petition till the date of realization of the amount due. The learned Counsel also would maintain that the learned II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, ought to have appreciated that while dealing with a claim under Sections 10 and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and under the said statute there is no provision for payment of interest on t...
Smt. G. Ramulamma W/O Late Pentaiah and anr. Vs. the Depot Manager, Ap ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ2193; 2009(1)ALT442
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This Appeal has been filed preferred by the claimants in M.V.O.P. No. 442 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Hyderabad.2. The deceased by name Yellamma is the mother of the petitioners. On 05-03- 2007 at about 6-00 AM, the deceased was proceeding by walk to Hotel Sherton to have a cup of tea. On reaching Quardri Bagh Cross Roads, an RTC bus, proceeding from Sri Ramana Theatre to Central Bus Station, came with high speed being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the deceased, which resulted in grievous injuries to her. The deceased was shifted to the Osmania General Hospital and while undergoing treatment in the hospital, she died on the next day, therefore, the petitioners claimed Rs. 3,00,000/- towards compensation.3. The respondents resisted the claim by contending that no accident took place as contended by the petitioners. They also denied that the petitioners are not the legal heirs of the deceased, t...
K. Venkat Reddy and ors. Vs. Chinnapareddy Viswanadha Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP1; 2008(6)ALD222; 2008(6)ALT360
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar, J.1. Both these appeals are filed against the common order dated 2.4.2008 passed by the learned I-Additional District Judge, Nizamabad allowing OP No. 309 of 2006 and dismissing, OP No. 89 of 2006. Both these appeals relate to custody of minor child C. Sainath Reddy who is now aged about 6 years (born on 17.9.2002). His grand parents are appellants 1 and 2 in both the appeals and the appellants 3 and 4 in CMA No. 396 of 2008 are their daughters. The natural father of the minor child is respondent in CMA No. 396 of 2008 and respondent No. 1 in CMA No. 410 of 2008 and respondent No. 2 in CMA No. 410 of 2008 is the father of the respondent No. 1. Both these appeals are disposed of by this common judgment.2. The dispute before the Court below and in these appeals relating to the custody of the minor child, is between his maternal grand parents and his natural father. The mother of the minor child Smt. Rajani committed suicide on 1.12.2004 when the child was about 2 1/...
Satish Kumar S/O Manohar and Mohd. Asif S/O Mohd. QamruddIn Vs. the St ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1099
K.C. Bhanu, J.1. These Criminal Appeals are preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Cr.P.C.) challenging the convictions and sentences recorded in judgment dated 21.6.2005 in Sessions Case No. 458 of 2005 on the file of the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. Originally, A.1 and A.2 filed Criminal Appeal No. 1133 of 2006, represented by State Brief. Thereafter, A1 preferred separate appeal in Criminal Appeal No. l3of2007.2. The learned Sessions Judge convicted A.1 of the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (for short, 'the I.P.C) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 100/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month; and A.2 of the offence under Section 302 read with 34 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 100/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month.3. The brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the prese...
Shakera Begum Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary Home Depart ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2008
Reported in: 2009(1)ALT354
ORDERK.C. Bhanu, J.1. Mother of the detenu, filed the present writ petition, challenging detention of her son, by name, Syed Wahed @ Wahab under Section 3(2) of the A.P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act (for brevity 'the Act').2. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, passed the impugned order in proceedings in S.B. (1) No. 119/PD-DGS-1/2007, dated 10-03-2008, detaining the son of the petitioner in Central Prison, Chenchalguda. The Detaining Authority referred to three cases; one relating to Kukatpally Police Station and the other two relating to S.R. Nagar Police Station. The detenu was an illiterate and he cannot read either Urdu or English and the substance of the detention order was not even explained to him in the language known to him. It is stated that the grounds of detention were not served upon him and thereby, depriving him from making representation against the order to the...
Revenue Divisional Officer and anr. Vs. Smt. Gampa Lakshmi Devi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP451
V. Eswaraiah, J.1. This writ appeal has been filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram and the Mandal Revenue Officer, Kothavalasa Mandal of Vizianagaram district, aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge, passed in WP No. 16583 of 1997, dated 04.11.1998, allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent herein, questioning the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 03.07.1997 passed in RC No. 2312/91 /A.2. The first appellant-the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram by order dated 03.07.1997 set aside the order of the Special Deputy Tahsildar (Field Check Officer), S. Kota, in granting patta in favour of the respondent herein in respect of the land in an extent of Ac. 1.28 cents in old Survey No. 61, corresponding to re-settlement No. 100/16. The respondent herein filed W.P. No. 16583 of 1997, questioning the said order of the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 03.07.1997, on the ground that she is the absolute owner of the land, an extent of Ac.1.26 ce...
Dr. (Miss) Sepuri Madhuri Vs. Dr. Ntr University of Health Sciences Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)ALT389
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, A.P, Vijayawada-1st respondent issued notification for admission to Super Speciality Courses (DM and M.Ch.) for the Academic Session 2008-2009. The method of selection for admission of candidates to Super Speciality Courses (DM & M.Ch.) for the Academic Session 2008-2009 is by way of entrance test. Dr. (Miss) Sepuri Madhuri- petitioner and Dr.Yeluri Sudha Rani-3rd respondent appeared for the entrance test held on 29.06.2008. Both of them secured 66 marks in the entrance test. They competed for admission for a seat in DM (Endocrinology). The eligibility under relevant qualifying examination for admission in DM (Endocrinology) is MD (General Medicine or Paediatrics or Biochemistry). The petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent got eligibility for admission in DM (Endocrinology) since they did MD in Biochemistry. Since both secured 66 secured marks in the entrance test, there was a tie between the petitioner and the 3r...
P. Manikyam and anr. Vs. the Sub-registrar and Three ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD268
ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorari to quash order dated 26-7-2005 in A.P. No. 1 of 2002 passed by District Registrar, Vizianagaram, respondent No. 2. 2. Under document dated 2-8-2002 an extent of Ac.1.08 cents of dry land in old Survey No. 197/1 (New Survey Nos. 197/2CP and 197/2E.2P) of Kothavalasa village and Mandal, Vizianagarm District, was purported to be sold in favour of respondent No. 4 by the petitioners for a sale consideration of Rs. 1.00 lakh. The said document described the names of as many as 15 persons, including the two petitioners herein, as the vendors. However, it was signed by the petitioners alone. The said document was presented for registration by respondent No. 4 before respondent No. 1. On receipt of the said document, respondent No. 1 issued summons to the petitioners. On 24-10-2002 the petitioners were present before respondent No. 1. On 28-10-2002 respondent No. 1 passed order, whereby he refused to register ...
Mr. P. Nagendra Prasad S/O Seshagiri Rao and ors. Vs. the Government o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD277; 2009(2)ALT220
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The short question for consideration in this group of writ petitions is whether subsidy of 25% payable under Gramin Bhandaran Yojana (Rural Godown Scheme) (hereafter referred to as the scheme) of the Central Government should be paid on the entire capital cost of construction of godown including allied facilities/amenities like internal roads, consumer shop, agri clinics, weighing, grading, packaging and quality certification, warehousing etc., or whether such subsidy is payable on the actual cost of the godown used for storage of food-grains. The answer to this question requires interpretation and understanding of the operational guidelines of the scheme dated 27.03.2002 issued by the Directorate of Marketing and Inspection (DMI), New Delhi, Department of Agriculture and Corporation in the Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. At the outset background of the cases may be noticed in nutshell.2. All the petitioners are owners of agricultural land in various...
P. Rajamullu and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Its Commissioner ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD627; 2008(6)ALT172
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners who are four in number assailing the notification dated 21-3-2006 issued by the Commissioner, Yellandu Municipality, inviting applications from the eligible persons to be co-opted as members of council.2. The petitioners are the members of the Municipal Council of Yellandu Municipality. The Municipal Council came to be constituted and its first meeting was held on 30th September, 2005. The Commissioner, Yellandu Municipality issued notification on 21-3-2006 inviting applications for being co-opted as members of the Council. The writ petitioners challenged the Notification on the ground that the Commissioner has no power to issue a Notification after sixty days from the date of the 1st meeting of the Council appointed by the Election Authority. For better understanding the grievance of the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to refer para 7 of the writ affidavit and it reads as hereunder:It is submitted ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »