Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court August 2008 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 01 2008

J. Srinivasa Rao Vs. Uco Bank Rep. by Its General Manager (Personnel) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-01-2008

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD199; 2008(6)ALT756; [2009(121)FLR137]

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Three important questions arise for consideration in this writ petition; viz, (a) whether it is obligatory on the part of the enquiry officer in departmental proceedings, to base his conclusions upon the discussion with reference to the oral and documentary evidence adduced before him; (b) whether it is permissible in law for the disciplinary authority, to impose separate punishments for individual charges; and (c) whether the appellate authority can impose more severe punishment on an employee, without issuing notice, indicating his mind and proposal.2. The facts that have given rise to filing of the writ petition are, in brief, as under. The petitioner was appointed initially as a Clerk in the respondent Bank on 22.11.1978. Thereafter, he was promoted to the cadres of JMG Grades I and II. In the year 2002, he worked as Assistant Manager at Rajahmundry Branch of the bank, and was designated as Recovery Officer.The bank introduced a scheme 'UCO Mega Cash L...


Aug 01 2008

Siriki Appalaswamy Vs. Sub-registrar

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-01-2008

Reported in: 2009(1)ALT101

ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. The petitioner claims that he had succeeded to the landed property to an extent of Ac.0.16 cents in Survey No. 43/21, Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No. 43/22, Ac.0.29 cents in Survey No. 43/23, Ac.0.18 cents in Survey No. 43/10 and Ac.0.02 cents in Survey No. 43/9 covered by T.D. No. 1406, situated in Rajayyapet village, Visakhapatnam, from his father, namely Siriki Sanyasi and maternal uncle, namely Rayavarapu Chinnayya, after their death. The petitioner states that his father and maternal uncle purchased the aforesaid property from their vendor, namely Sri Pilla Papayya Patrudu and two others under registered document No. 3861, dated 12-12-1968, registered in the office of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Visakhapatnam, and since then they were in possession and enjoyment of the same. The petitioner states that several of his relatives had also purchased lands in the said survey numbers during the period 18-4-1968 to 1-6-1970.2. The petitioner states that taking advantage of...


Aug 01 2008

Dr. Yadla Ramesh Naidu Vs. Sub-registrar, Sabbavaram and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-01-2008

Reported in: 2009(1)ALT256

ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and in possession of an extent of Acs. 2-01 cents in Sy. No. 29; Acs. 5-40 cents in Sy. Nos. 239/9 to 20; Acs. 6-00 cents in Sy. No. 282/1 (old 93/4); Acs. 7-82 cents in Sy. Nos. 277/1 to 11 (old 26/3 & 4); Acs. 17-22 cents in Sy. Nos. 93/2 to 38 and Acs. 19-09 cents in Sy. Nos. 26/1 and 2, totaling Acs. 57-54 cents of Gollapalem village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam, having purchased the same from his vendors, namely Garlapati Ramesh and Ors. under six registered sale deeds dated 25.08.2003. The petitioner states that originally his vendors were given ryotwari pattas under Section 4 of Andhra Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 in respect of the above lands.2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner having agreed to sell the aforementioned lands owned by him to one Sri. G. Goutham and Ors. having received the sale consideration, executed sale deeds in their favou...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial