Andhra Pradesh Court August 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gandarapu Narasimhulu @ Narisimha Chowdary Vs. District Collector and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD809; 2009(1)ALT149
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. Assailing the issuance of Pattadar Pass Books and title deeds issued by the 3rd respondent, namely the Mandal Revenue Officer, Anantapur (Tahsildar), in respect of an extent of Ac.5-29 cents in Sy. No. 192 of Akkampalli village, Anantapur Mandal, in favour of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, the petitioner preferred appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, who by order dated 28.10.2006, cancelled the Pattadar Pass Books, issued by the 3rd respondent, in favour of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, and remanded the matter to him, for de novo enquiry and for finalization of the ownership of the land. Aggrieved by the said order, respondent Nos. 4 to 6 filed revision before the 2nd respondent, namely the Joint Collector, Anantapur, and the same is pending in File No. R.C. No. D4/5869/ 2006. While the case is pending, it is the case of the petitioner that the 2nd respondent, passed the impugned order dated 31.05.2008, directing the 3rd respondent to inspect the land in q...
Kakollu Lakshmana Rao and anr. Vs. Javvadi Subbayamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD584
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri A.V. Sesha Sai, learned Counsel representing revision petitioners and Sri Rama Mohan Palanki and Sri K. Chidambaram, learned Counsel representing contesting respondents.2. This Court while admitting the civil revision petition on 4.4.2008 in C.R.P. M.P. No. 1781 of 2008 made the following order:There shall be interim stay of proceedings in E.P. No. 44 of 2003 in O.S. No. 74 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Narsapuram, on condition of the petitioners herein depositing a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) to the credit of E.P. within a period of ten days from today. In default, this order shall stand rescinded without further reference to Court, and it shall be open to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Narsapuram, to proceed with E.P. No. 44 of 2003.3. It is stated that the said conditional order had been complied with. CRP MP No. 3370 of 2008 is filed to vacate the interim stay granted in CRP MP No. 1781 of 2008...
Nallamalla Prabhakar Rao Vs. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD501
ORDERG. Chandraiah, J.1. Heard both the Counsel.2. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not taking a decision for reappointment of the petitioner as per the terms of Circular No. P40/5911/IR/335 dated 10.3.2000 issued by the 2nd respondent -the Director, (PA&W;), Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem as per memo of settlement dated 21.2.2000 even though the petitioner was interviewed as long back as on 18.10.2000, as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.3. The case of the petitioner as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is that he was working as temporary general mazdoor of the 1st respondent - the Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem and was appointed as General Mazdoor in Category-I with effect from 1.1.1985 vide office order of the 3rd respondent-the General Manager (Personnel), Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Munugur, Khamm...
Ch. Siva Kumari Vs. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Instit ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD755
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is appointed as a P.G. Teacher in the A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society (for short 'the Society'). By June 2008, she was working in an institution of the Society at Mababubabad, Warangal District. The respondents have undertaken general transfers and conducted counselling for that purpose. Vide order, dated 16.6.2008, the Secretary of the Society transferred the petitioner to an institution at Wyra, Khammam District. However, the Chairman of the Society, 3rd respondent herein, issued orders, dated 15.7.2008, transferring the petitioner to the institution at Kalluru, Khammam District, in the place of the 2nd respondent, and the latter was posted to the institution at Wyra. The same is challenged in this writ petition.2. The petitioner contends that the order of transfer, dated 16.6.2008, was not challenged by anyone and in fact, no one has any grievance, since it was against a clear vacancy and did not result in...
S. Shakeela and ors. Vs. S. Khaleel and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)600; 2008(3)ALT(Cri)283; 2009CriLJ511
ORDERS. Ashok Kumar, J.1. This criminal revision case is filed by the wife and children of the respondent-husband against the order dated 6-7-1999 of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati in Criminal Revision Petition No. 35 of 1999 which was preferred against the order dated 3-3-1999 in M.C. No. 7 of 1996 passed by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vayalpad.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:The petitioners filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance of Rs. 500/- each. The case of the petitioners is that the first petitioner is legally wedded wife of the respondent-husband and their marriage took place about five years prior to the filing of the application. Petitioners 2 and 3 born out of the above said wedlock. Apart from gold ornaments, Rs. 10,000/- was also paid to the respondent-husband towards his clothing etc., at the time of marriage. After the marriage, the first petitioner and respondent-husband lived happily...
B.F. Dittia S/O F.N. Ditya and ors. Vs. the Appropriate Authority, Inc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: (2009)222CTR(AP)390; [2008]307ITR158(AP)
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Exercise of the right of pre-emptive purchase by the Central Government, under Section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, of 'Rustom Villa', a residential building, and the order issued in this regard on 30.3.1998, are the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.2. 'Rustom Villa' at Sardar Patel Road, Secunderabad, belonged to Mrs.Zenobia Rustom Ranji who passed away on 29.10.1988. She had earlier executed a will on 22.5.1987 appointing the petitioners as executors in respect of her properties including 'Rustom Villa'. Under the will, the said residential building was to be sold and the sale proceeds was to be donated to nine charitable institutions. Petitioners claim to have got the property valued by two valuers according to whom it was worth Rs. 15.32 lakhs and Rs. 15.60 lakhs respectively. The petitioners entered into an agreement of sale with Mrs. Sanbar N. Markar on 14.12.1989 for a total consideration of Rs. 15.60 lakhs. They filed the statem...
Berla Ramesh Vs. V.B. Markandeya and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD714
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The 2nd respondent filed O.S. No. 34 of 1998 in the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, against the 3rd respondent for recovery of certain amount. The suit was decreed, and after the decree became final, the 2nd respondent filed E.P. No. 172 of 2000. An item of immovable property was attached, and thereafter, brought to sale, on 26.8.2002. The 1st respondent emerged as the auction-purchaser, and the sale was confirmed on 7.11.2002. The petitioner, who is a third party to the decree, raised an objection for confirmation of sale. According to him, he too filed a suit, in respect of that very property, for specific performance of an agreement of sale against the 3rd respondent, and that the said suit was decreed. He is said to have filed an E.P., for execution of the sale. It is stated that, at the instance of the 1st respondent herein, the said E.P. was dismissed.2. The petitioner filed C.R.P. No. 6018 of 2002 before this Court against the o...
Dr. J. Ramachandra Rao Vs. A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd. an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP19; 2008(6)ALD404
ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. The petitioner Mr. J. Ramachandrarao questions the orders of the Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, APEPDC Limited, Eluru dated 12.12.2000, requesting the petitioner to arrange the payment of arrears of Rs. 82,697-59 ps alleging that the said dues are payable by the petitioner Managing Director of M/s. Delta Oils and Fats Limited during the period when the petitioner was Managing Director of the said company upto 12.8.1991. It is further stated that no intimation about the change of the petitioner as Managing Director was received by the respondents till 20.10.2000 and Managing Director alone is responsible for the deeds and acts committed by the Company as all the decisions are being taken by him. Insofar as identification purpose only, the name of the Company has been given. The arrears belong to the tenure of the petitioner as Managing Director and hence he is liable to discharge his liabilities.2. The 1st respondent earlier issued Letter No. SE/Q/ELR...
V. Papaiah Vs. A.P. Northern Power Distribution Company Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD390; 2009(1)ALT172
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is working as Additional Assistant Engineer, in the Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, the first respondent herein. The Chairman and Managing Director of the Company initiated disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. He appointed the Superintending Engineer of the concerned wing, as Enquiry Officer. The latter, in turn, issued a charge-sheet, dated 29.9.2006, framing relevant charges. Departmental enquiry was conducted and the Enquiry Officer submitted his report on 27.2.2007, holding that the charges, framed against the petitioner, are proved. Thereafter, the first respondent issued a show-cause notice, dated 19.6.2007. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 27.7.2007. On consideration of the same, the first respondent passed an order, dated 23.2.2008, reverting the petitioner to the post of Sub-Engineer, for a period of three years. The same is challenged in this writ petition.2. The petitioner had urged three conten...
D. Ramadevi and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP15; 2008(6)ALD23; 2009(1)ALT1
ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to set aside notification dated 22.1.2004 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the 1894 Act') by respondent No. 1 to the extent of Ac.0.24 cents comprised in Survey No. 289/2 of Vatluru Village, Peddapadu Mandal, West Godavari District.2. The petitioners claimed to be the owners of the above mentioned land as having succeeded to the said property under gift deed dated 8.2.2001 executed by the original owner of the property, by name, Sri Nageswara Rao. In her affidavit, petitioner No. 1 stated that the said Nageswara Rao was the owner of Ac.4.00 cents of agricultural land having purchased the same in the year 1972 and that he gave away most of the said land to the Andhra Pradesh Housing Board (for short 'the Board') in the year 1994 and gifted the remaining land of Ac.0.24 cents to the petitioners. She stated that the purpose mentioned in the notification, viz., construc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »