Andhra Pradesh Court July 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Apsrtc, Rep. by Its Divisional Manager and anr. Vs. Presiding Officer, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2008
Reported in: (2009)ILLJ94AP
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The 2nd respondent (for short 'the respondent') was employed as a conductor in the APSRTC. A charge sheet, dated April 29, 1999, was issued to him, alleging certain irregularities, in the matter of accounting the bundles of tickets of various denominations. He was also placed under suspension. Domestic enquiry was ordered, but the respondent did not participate in it. Complaining that the subsistence allowance was not paid and that documents were not supplied, the respondent approached this Court, more than once. Ultimately, through order dated February 12, 2002, the 2nd petitioner removed the respondent from service. Appeal filed against the same, before the 1st petitioner, was also rejected on January 9, 2003. Thereupon the respondent filed I.D. No. 8/2003, before the Labour Court-Ill, Hyderabad. Through its award dated February 7,2005, the Labour Court allowed the I.D., setting aside the order of removal, and directed reinstatement of the respondent, wi...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Md. Rahmatullah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2008
Reported in: 2008ACJ224
G. Bhavani Prasad, J.1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., arrayed as respondent No. 2 in O.P. No. 983 of 1994 on the file of Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases-cum-Fifth Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad filed this appeal against the award dated 5.1.1998 and also the petition in C.M.P. No. 23021 of 2000 to receive the office copy of the cover note No. 48826 as additional evidence.2. The factual background is that in an accident involving Ambassador car owned by respondent No. 1 in O.P. No. 983 of 1994, the son of claimant Nos. 1 and 2, who is the elder brother of claimant Nos. 3 and 4 in the said claim petition, died and the claimants claiming to be the dependants, filed the petition for a compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 against the owner of the car and also United India Insurance Co. Ltd., claiming the car to have been insured with the same.3. The insurance company denied the allegations of the claimants and put them to strict proof, while specifically claiming that the policy...
Dr. B. Krishna Reddy S/O. Late B. Rami Reddy, Research Associate, Depa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD52; 2008(5)ALT257
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. Heard Sri P.V. Sanjay Kumar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for the 3rd respondent. Sri O. Manohar Reddy for the 4th respondent and Smt. G. Jhansi for respondent Nos. 5, 7, 8 to 10, 12 and 14 have appeared and put forth their respective contentions on behalf of these respondents. Notices have been served on respondent Nos. 6, 11 and 13 also as per the record. No counter-affidavits have been filed on behalf of respondent No. 4, 6, 11 and 13. Sri B. Narayana Reddy, Advocate has filed vakalat on 28-04-1998 for respondent No. 15 but no counter has been filed.2. In WPMP No. 6822 of 1998, the petitioner sought to implead Dr. Bhupathi Naidu and Smt. T. Vijaya as party respondent Nos. 14 and 15 to the writ petition, alleging that these respondents were subsequently appointed, pursuant to the selection consequent on the ...
K. Veera Chary S/o Kistaiah Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD372; 2008(5)ALT115
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.Introduction1. Petitioners are Judicial Officers in the rank of District Judge Grade-II. They are governed by Andhra Pradesh State Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1958 (Higher Judicial Rules, for brevity). Both of them were initially appointed as District Munsiffs (redesignated as Junior Civil Judges), to State Judicial Service regulated by Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules, 1962 (Judicial Rules, for brevity). They were promoted as Senior Civil Judges, and later they were appointed by transfer as District Judges Grade-II to Higher Judicial Service. Government of Andhra Pradesh acting on the recommendation of High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms. No. 87, dated 28.07.2007, and G.O.Ms. No. 32, dated 07.04.2007, compulsorily retiring them with effect from last day of the month in which orders were passed. As these orders were issued in purported exercise of powers under first proviso or second proviso to Sub-section (1A) of Section 3 of Andhra Pradesh Publ...
Bodupalli Sathaiah and ors. Vs. Koppula Pedda Linga Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD311
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed, against the order dated 3.7.2000, passed by the Joint Collector, R.15. The genesis of the proceedings, in brief, is as under. One Thakur Devi Singh was the pattadar of an extent of Acs.82-13 gts., in Survey Nos. 1443, etc. of Arjalabavi, hamlet of Panagal Village, Nalgonda Mandal and District. Koppula Narsaiah, Veeraiah, Ramaiah, Verikataiah and Lingaiah, the ancestors of respondents 1 to 12, were declared as protected tenants, in respect of Acs.3-34 gts. in Sy. No. 1445, under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short 'the Tenancy Act'). They were also issued certificates, under Section 38-E of that Act on 30.10.1975.2. One Smt. Bharathi Bai challenged the certificates issued in favour of the predecessor-in-title, by filing an appeal before the Joint Collector. The appeal was rejected, and thereupon, she filed CRP No. 2636 of 1985, before this Court. The revision was also dismissed on 8.4.19...
Gajjela Narasimha Reddy and ors. Vs. Collector and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD302; 2008(5)ALT233
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. Since these three writ petitions raise common issues, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The petitioners are owners of certain lands, which are notified for acquisition under three separate notifications dated 14.7.2004 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act').3. For convenience, the details are shown in the table below:W.P. No. Name of the Sy. No. Extent Date of Date of Date of petitioners Ac. Gts Notification Publication notification in the in the Gazette newspapers13863/05 1. Gajjela 764 of 28-20 14.7.2004 14.7.2004 Deccan Chronicle Narasimha Reddy Mankhal and Eenadu on 2. V. Pandu Village, 21.8.2004 Local Ranga Reddy Maheswara publication of 3. Smt. V. Aruna Mandal, substance on Jyothi R.R. Dist 12.5.2005 4. N. Ayodya Rama Reddy14247/05 1. Gajjela 763 of 4-32 -do- -do- -do- Narasimha Mankhal Reddy Village, 2. Gajjela Maheswara Venugopal Mandal, Reddy R.R. Dist14478/05 1. T. N...
K. Prasanna Kumar Vs. Superintending Engineer (Operation), Apcpdcl and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD701; [2008(119)FLR997]
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The father of the petitioner, by name Madaiah, was initially engaged as a Contract Labour for the works undertaken by the then A.P. State Electricity Board. His case was not considered in terms of B.P. Ms. No. 36, dated 18.5.1997, against 50% vacancies, on the ground that he was over-aged. However, he was appointed as Village Electricity Worker and thereafter, as Contract Junior Lineman on 5.8.2002. The contract was extended from time to time. When he was undertaking the repair of a transformer on 12.12.2004, he was electrocuted and died. The petitioner submitted a representation to the respondents with a request to provide him employment on compassionate grounds. His grievance is that the respondents are not considering his case and no action has been taken on the representation filed by him.2. The 1st respondent filed a counter-affidavit. The fact that Madaiah was appointed as Village Electricity Worker and thereafter, as Contract Junior Lineman, is admi...
A. Venkat Reddy Vs. District and Sessions Judge and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD755; 2008(6)ALT606
C.V. Ramulu, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in issuing Proceedings L.Dis.No. 32/Estt/2006, dated 11.1.2007 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently to set aside the same.2. It appears, at the relevant point of time, the petitioner was working as Upper Division Clerk/Deputy Nazir in the Court of III Additional District Judge, Tirupathi. In the midnight of 19/20.7.2005, due to heavy downpour, rain water entered into the residential quarters of the Judicial Officers at Tirupathi. Petitioner was informed to rush to the quarters for help and to remove the Court files etc. However, petitioner reached the quarters at 6.30 am on 20.7.2005. Thus, immediately he did not reach the quarters for rendering assistance to the Judicial Officers. Therefore, respondent No. 1 issued a charge-sheet dated 8.12.2005 enumerating the following charge:That the said Sri A. Venkat Reddy, Senior Assistant, while working as Senior Assistant (D.N.) in...
M. Sunkanna Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD623
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was working as a Depot Manager, Rayachoti. He retired from service with effect from 30.6.2008. The second respondent initiated disciplinary action against the petitioner by issuing a charge-sheet, dated 2.5.2008. He has also placed the petitioner under suspension, vide orders, dated 9.3.2008. A departmental enquiry was conducted and a report was submitted on 21.6.2008. The second respondent got displayed a show-cause notice, dated 21.6.2008, in the office of the Depot. The petitioner was on sick leave from 27.6.2007 onwards. Alleging that the petitioner did not respond to the show-cause notice, the second respondent passed a final order, dated 29.6.2008, imposing the penalty of reduction of his basic pay by one incremental stage which shall have the effect on computation of remaining benefits. The same is challenged in this writ petition.2. The petitioner contends that even when he was issued a charge-sheet, dated 2.5.2008, he submitted a re...
S.S. Hari Prasad Vs. District and Sessions Judge-cum-disciplinary Auth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALD751; 2008(6)ALT625
V.V.S. Rao, J.1. The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the second respondent dated 11.7.2007 whereby and whereunder the application filed by the petitioner to condone the delay in his appearance and permit him to appear before the enquiring authority in the matter of regular departmental enquiry ordered by first respondent was rejected. The petitioner also assails the proceedings of first respondent dated 30.7.2007 whereby and whereunder the application of the petitioner which was filed by way of appeal against the proceedings of the second respondent was rejected. Along with the said order, a Xerox copy of the proceedings dated 27.1.2006 placing the petitioner under suspension was communicated to him.2. The petitioner at the relevant time was working as Superintendent in the Court of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam at Gajuwaka. He was an accused in Crime No. 346 of 2005 filed by Punjab and Sind Bank under Section...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »