Andhra Pradesh Court December 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Trust Association of the Convention of Baptist Churches Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT442
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In these two writ petitions, G.O.Ms. No. 3, Education, dated 10.01.2000 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh is challenged. The impugned G.O. was issued proposing to acquire the property of McLaurin High School, Kakinada (for short 'the school') under Section 67(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 (for short 'the Act').2. When the country was under British Rule, an agency known as Canadian Baptist Foreign Mission Board, which was later renamed as Canadian Baptist Overseas Mission Board, was functioning with the object of spreading Christianity. The school was established by the said organization in the year 1911. After independence of India, the Board, while winding up its activity, transferred the management of the school to the Convention of the Baptist Churches of the Northern Circars (for short 'CBCNC'). As regards the administration of various properties, O.P. No. 15 of 1974 was filed in the Madras High Court and in pursuance of the ord...
Shenyang Furukewa Cable Co. Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corporation of Andhr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)ALT590
ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 - Transmission Corporation of A.P. Limited in opening the price bids of the respondents 3 to 5 herein pursuant to the Tender Notice No. APT/76/2007 is arbitrary and illegal and consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to evaluate the tenders strictly in accordance with the eligibility conditions prescribed under the Tender Notification.2. The facts, in brief are as under:The Transmission Corporation of A.P. Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'A.P. TRANSCO'> issued Tender Notice No. APT/76/2007 inviting tenders for supply, erection, testing and commissioning of 220 KV/132 KV Gas Insulated Sub-Stations at Erragadda (Lot-1) and Chilakalaguda (Lot-2) along with supply, laying, testing and commissioning of 220 KV XLPE Underground Cables with associated accessories. As per the said tender notice the bids are to be submitted in two parts namely Techno Commercial Bid and Pri...
Saleha Fatima and ors. Vs. Mirza Fazal HussaIn Baig and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP103
ORDERG. Yethirajulu, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 1828 of 2003 preferred the present appeal challenging the Decree and Judgment of the lower Court dated 12-03-2008 in O.S. No. 1828 of 2003. The plaintiffs filed the above suit for partition of money of Rs. 21,00,255.75 ps. The suit was decreed holding that plaintiffs are entitled to 1/6th share each out of total amount received on the personal insurance policy of late Mirza Hashim Hussain Baig by the first defendant. Being aggrieved by the same, defendants 1 to 3 preferred the present appeal.2. The averments of the plaintiffs by the plaintiffs are briefly as follows:The plaintiffs are the father and mother of late Mirza Hashim Hussain Baig. He is the only son among other children. Defendant No. 1 is the wife and defendants 2 and 3 are children of the deceased Baig. During the lifetime of the deceased, he. worked at Meero and Co. Sharjah, Abu Dhabi as Project Engineer and while working he purchased insurance policy of his life for and...
Walnut Packaging P. Ltd. Vs. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: [2009]148CompCas330(AP)
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar, J.1. The unsuccessful creditor before the company court has filed this appeal assailing the order of the learned company judge dismissing the company petition in C. P. No. 200 of 2004, dated March 18, 2008 (Walnut Packing P. Ltd. v. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. , filed for winding up of the respondents-companies, at the admission stage.2. This appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for brevity 'the Act') was heard at length by us as several questions of fact and law were elaborately argued by learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Counsel for the respondents.3. The first respondent-company is carrying on business of manufacture of pulp and paper boards, incorporated on November 17, 1938, and is a reputed company having share capital of Rs. 25 crores of which the subscribed and paid-up share capital is Rs. 8,34,06,690. Except the allegation that the second respondent-company is a subsidiary of the first respondent-company, there has...
V. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Princi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP478
ORDERGhulam Mohammad, J.1. The writ petitioner herein is applicant in O.A. No. 9317 of 2002. The writ petitioner and one N. Ram Mohan Rao, filed O.As., before the Tribunal seeking declaration that note 3(ii) and (iii) of the Rule 3 of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Services Rules, (or short 'the Rules'), as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and to direct the respondents to consider only such of the Deputy Executive Engineers who possess the qualifications prescribed in the Annexure to Rule 3(b) for promotion to the post of Executive Engineers.2. It is the case of the applicants before the Tribunal that they joined the government service as Assistant Executive Engineers (A.E.Es.) in the year 1980 and later they were selected by the A.P.P.S.C and appointed in the year 1984. The applicants were promoted as Deputy Executive Engineers, on 6-2-1990 and 11-2-1991 respectively. The post of Assistant Executive Engineer is gov...
Balaga Savithramma Vs. Nalla Satyanarayana and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)ALT1
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two writ petitions are filed against the common order dated 03-10-2008, passed in O.P.Nos. 689 of 2007 and 217 of 2008. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in W.P.No. 23854 of 2008.2. Elections to the Gram Panchayat of Kannampet, Vizianagaram District were held that the petitioner had three living children, out of whom, two were born after 31-05-1995. The objection was overruled by the Returning Officer, and the nomination of the petitioner was accepted. The petitioner secured majority of votes and she was declared elected.3. The 1st respondent, who is a voter in the Gram Panchayat, submitted a representation on 31-08-2006 to the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat, stating that the petitioner incurred disqualification under Section 19(3) of the Act, and requested him to take necessary steps. He also filed Election O.P. No. 689 of 2007 before the Court of District Judge-cum-Authority under Section 22 of the Act, with a prayer ...
Sekharamahanti Nagabhushanarao (Died) Per L.R. Vs. Andhra University, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)ALT260
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The Division Bench ot this Court by order dated 28-9-2006 allowed this writ petition, which is in the following terms:In view of the decision taken by this Bench in Jonnalagadda Samrajyam v. The Registrar Special Court Coustituted Under The AP Land Grabbing (P) Act, 1982, in WP No. 19619 of 2002 and batch, dated 23-8-2006 (1996 (5) ALT 690 (D.B.)), the instant writ petition shall have to be disposed of in terms thereof. The applicant herein is statutory authority, namely, Andhra University. It filed an application under Section 7-A of the AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, against the writ petitioner. Such an application cannot be maintained is the decision of this Court in the judgment referred to hereinabove.The writ petition is, therefore, allowed. But, under the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.2. It is on record that the judgment in Jonnalagadda Samrajyam v. The Registrar Special Court Coustituted Under The AP Land Grabbing (P) A...
Mohd. Mujtaba Vs. Mohd. Ahmed Pasha and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)ALT209
ORDERG. Yethirajulu, J.1. This revision petition has been preferred by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 1038 of 2007 on the file of the IV Additional Rent Controller-cum-XVI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. The said suit was filed by the plaintiff for perpetual injunction. In the said suit the defendants filed a counter claim for partition of the suit schedule properties into four shares and put the defendants in one such share. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed I.A. No. 222 of 2007 under Order VIII Rule 6-C read with Section 151 C.P.C praying to exclude the counter claim made by the defendants as prayed for. The plaintiff is contending that he is in exclusive possession of the property. He filed the suit for permanent injunction and also obtained a temporary injunction. The defendants are claiming that the plaintiff and the defendants are in joint possession of the properties. Therefore, the properties are liable for partition. The plaintiff is contending that the filed the...
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Principal Secretary to Government ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALT306
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The matter is coming up for admission. Heard the learned Government Pleader for Revenue representing the revision petitioners, Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Counsel representing the first respondent-petitioner-plaintiff and Sri M.A. Rafi, learned Standing Counsel representing the 2nd respondent.2. This Court on 20-11-2008 made the following order:Assailing the order dated 27-11-2007, passed by the. A.P. Wakf Tribunal, in I.A. No. 548 of 2007 in O.S. No. 106 of 2007, as irregular and contrary to the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 and the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and consequently to set aside the same, the petitioners-Government, filed the present writ petition.The writ petition was admitted and unofficial respondent No. 2 also filed counter.The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 2 placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in Mohd Abdul Kareem v. A.P. State Wakf Board : 2004 (3) ALT 254, submitted that the present writ petition, file...
The Housing Board Employees, Iv Phase, Plot Allottes Welfare Associati ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-2008
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT532
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to register the plots in Sy. Nos. 964 and 1009 of Kukatpally village in Phase-IV of the lay out plan prepared for A.P.H.B. Employees Housing Scheme in the individual names of the Housing Board Employees in pursuance of G.O.Ms. No. 2, Housing Department, dated 10-01-1991 and for cancellation of the allotment of flats in G.O.Ms. No. 32, dated 12-09-2006.2. All the writ petitions are filed seeking the same relief against the same respondents, therefore, they are clubbed and heard together and this common order is passed.3. The averments of the Affidavits filed in support of the writ petitions are briefly as under: The petitioners are the members of the A.P. Housing Board Employees Phase-IV plot allottees Welfare Association represented by its President, Hyderabad. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioners contended that the said...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »