Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court January 2008 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 17 2008

K. Lalithamma Vs. Branch Manager, State Bank of India (Adb) and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(2)ALD489; 2008(2)ALT243

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The writ petitioner filed the present writ petition for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not returning the title deeds by demanding a further sum of Rs. 88,500/- towards balance loan amount in spite of settlement of dispute by Lok Adalat vide proceedings in LSA No. 3170/2003, R.A., dated 17.8.2003 on payment of Rs. 15,000/- as full and final settlement of the loan amount as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Section 21(2) of the A.P. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and consequently direct the respondents to return the title deeds of the petitioner, which are in the custody of the 1st respondent bank and pass such other suitable orders.2. Sri Rathangapani Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner had taken this Court through the Award made by the Special Lok Adalat, Cuddapah, Camp at Rajampet, under Section 21 of the A.P. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (hereinafter, in short, would be referred to as '...


Jan 17 2008

White Circles Oxides Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director, M.V. Ramana ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(2)ALT257

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent-Industrial Development Bank of India in issuing Notices dated 5.2.2007 and 7.4.2007 under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the Act') as arbitrary and illegal and in violation of the petitioner's fundamental rights guaranteed to it under Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.2. The Managing Director of the petitioner-company, who had sworn in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, had stated that the respondents, after issuing the notices impugned in the writ petition, lodged a caveat under Section 148-A CPC on 7.8.2007 and they were later served with advance notices of the writ petition. He had further stated that the petitioner-company was registered in the year 1997 with the sole intent of manufacturing a highly specialized material call...


Jan 17 2008

D. Kanakachary Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(3)ALD415; 2008(2)ALT286

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court ordered notice before admission on 30-8-2007 and issued rule nisi on 23-11-2007. Counter affidavit is filed.2. Heard Sri V. Sai Ram Goud, Counsel representing the writ petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. At the request of Counsel on record, the Writ Petition itself is being disposed of finally though the matter is appearing under the caption 'Interlocutory'.3. The Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Case No. CS1/991/2007 dated 17-8-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same in respect of Fair Price Shop Dealer of Chinnakonduru Village of Choutuppal Mandal, Nalgonda District and to pass such other suitable orders.4. Sri Sai Ram Goud, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner had taken this Court through the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition and...


Jan 17 2008

Harikishore Bhattad and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Department of F ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(2)ALT225; [2008]144CompCas687(AP); [2010]97SCL261(AP)

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus questioning/challenging the proceedings in MRD/DSA/101507/2007, dated 16.8.2007 issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) i.e., the 2nd and 3rd respondents, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, apart from contrary to the provisions of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the Hyderabad Stock Exchange Limited (Corporatisation and Demutualisation) Scheme, 2005 and Securities and Contracts (Regulation) (Manner of increasing and maintaining public share holding in recognized stock exchange).2. 4th respondent-Hyderabad Stock Exchange Limited was impleaded as per order dated 7.9.2007 made in W.P.M.P. No. 23994 of 2007.3. Counter-affidavit had been filed by respondents 2 and 3 and reply affidavit also had been filed by the writ petitioners. This Court issued notice before admission on 29.8.2007 and further issued Rule nisi on ...


Jan 17 2008

Nataru Govinda Reddy Alias Govindu Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)539; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)124; 2008CriLJ3296

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The sole accused in S.C. No. 122 of 2000 on the file of the Special Judge for trial of offences under SCs & STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Prakasam District at Ongole, filed this appeal, feeling aggrieved by the conviction and sentence handed out to him by the trial Court. He was tried for the offence under Section 302, IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'), alleging that he committed the murder of one Kasukurthi Nagamani. The trial Court acquitted the appellant for the offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the Act, but convicted him for the one under Section 302, IPC. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. The prosecution case against the appellant commenced with the receipt of intimation from the Headquarters hospital, by the Head Constable of Police, Sing...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial