Andhra Pradesh Court September 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Patibanda Soma Sundara Rao Vs. Chilakamarthi Mohana Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD270; 2008(1)ALT701
B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. The appellant-Patibanda Soma Sundara Rao questions the correctness of the judgment rendered by I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, who allowed the appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the Code).2. The appellant was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 1220 of 1990 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Vijayawada. He filed the suit against Chilakamarthi Mohana Rao, respondent herein, and his son Chilakamarthi Ravi Kumar being minor represented by his mother-Valli Mohan for cancellation of the sale deeds dated 21-12-1981 executed by late Patibanda Sunder Rao in favour of Chilakamarthi Mohana Rao-1st defendant in respect of item No. 1 and Chilakamarthi Ravi Kumar in respect of item No. 2 of the plaint schedule properties. He also sought for consequential relief of possession of the suit schedule item Nos. 1 and 2, and for costs in the suit.3. The plaint averments, in brief, are:Late Patibanda Sunder Rao was an Advocate of Vi...
Regional Directer Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Zuari Ceme ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD775; 2007(6)ALT223; [2007(115)FLR1141]
B. Prakash Rao , J.1. These appeals are at the instance of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Hyderabad, under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'), aggrieved by the orders passed in E.I. Case Nos. 85 of 2002,101 of 2001 and 69 of 2001 respectively, dated 18.10.2004, 16.05.2003 and 18.10.2004 respectively, on the file of the Employees' Insurance Court and Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-I, Hyderabad, allowing the petitions filed by respondent No. 1 herein under Section 75(1)(g) of the Act seeking declaration of exemption from the applicability of the Act and the scheme thereunder for the periods mentioned in the respective petitions and consequently to set aside the respective demand notices issued by the appellant demanding certain amounts towards contribution and also interest thereon.2. Heard Sri B.G. Ravindra Reddy, Smt. Pushpinder Kaur, Sri William Burra, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of appellant-Corporation and Sri M....
The Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Zuari ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: (2008)ILLJ835AP
B. Prakash Rao, J.1. These appeals are at the instance of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Hyderabad, under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'), aggrieved by the orders passed in E.I. Case Nos. 85 of 2002, 101 of 2001 and 69 of 2001 respectively, dated 18.10.2004, 16.05.2003 and 18.10.2004 respectively, on the file of the Employees' Insurance Court and Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-I, Hyderabad, allowing the petitions filed by respondent No. 1 herein under Section 75(1)(g) of the Act seeking declaration of exemption from the applicability of the Act and the scheme thereunder for the periods mentioned in the respective petitions and consequently to set aside the respective demand notices issued by the appellant demanding certain amounts towards contribution and also interest thereon.2. Heard Sri B.G. Ravindra Reddy, Smt. Pushpinder Kaur, Sri William Burra, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of appellant-Corporation and Sri M....
Chebrolu Jaganmohan Rao Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD126
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. On 27.4.2005 this Court issued rule nisi and in W.P.M.P. No. 12665/ 2005 this Court made the following Order:Pending disposal of W.P. No. 9702/2005, there shall be interim stay as prayed for.W.V.M.P. No. 2360/2006 filed to vacate the interim order granted in W.P.M.P. No. 12665/ 2005 in W.P. No. 9702/2005 dated 27.4.2005 and pass such other suitable orders.2. Heard Sri S. Surya Prakasha Rao, the learned Advocate representing the writ petitioner and the learned A.G.P. for Endowments.At the request of the Counsel on record, the writ petition itself is being disposed of finally.3. The writ petitioner Ch.Jaganmohan Rao, filed the present writ petition for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to execute and register sale deeds in respect of plots Nos. 5 and 36 in S. No. 9, Nidubrolu Village, Ponnur Mandal, Guntur District belonging to Sri Chennakesavaswamy Temple, Nidubrolu Village, in favour of the petitioner or his nominees after receiving balance of bid am...
P. Ravichandra Reddy Vs. Executive Engineer, Irrigation and Cad Depart ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD93
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court issued Rule nisi on 11.10.2006 and in WPMP No. 26725 of 2006, an interim direction had been granted directing the respondent not to deny the petitioner in participating in future contracts until further orders. WVMP No. 914 of 2007 is filed to vacate the interim order.2. Sri Koona Reddy Anji Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the petitioner, would maintain that the alleged show-cause notice, on which the respondents is relying upon, is in relation to a different ground altogether, and even otherwise, the same is vague. Specifically, for putting the petitioner in the blacklist, no show-cause notice, as such, had been issued and no explanation had been called for, and hence, the same is in violation of principles of natural justice. The Counsel also placed strong reliance on Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Anr. : [1975]2SCR674 .3. Per contra, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation had taken this Co...
Kasarapu Sujatha and anr. Vs. Veera Velli Veera Somaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: 2008(3)ALD525; 2008(4)ALT82
B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. Unsuccessful defendants in the trial Court as well as in the lower appellate Court are the appellants in this second appeal.2. The respondent is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 169 of 1994 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Surayapet. He filed the suit for declaration of his title and injunction. He also sought for relief of recovery of possession of certain extent of land wherein some structures exist. It is the case of the plaintiff that he purchased the suit schedule land comprising Survey No. 475 admeasuring Ac. 2.05 guntas; Survey No. 476 admeasuring Ac. 0.26 guntas and Survey No. 477 admeasuring Ac. 0.26 guntas from Kotha Rami Reddy and his son Kotha Yakava Reddy under Ex.A-2 registered sale deed dated 5-8-1976. He got his name mutated in the revenue records as Pattedarand he paid the cist for the said land till the State Government exempted collection of cist for the agricultural land in the year 1984. The defendant No. 1 along with his sister Prameela f...
Jakka Taraka Mallikharjuna Rao Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD297; 2008(4)ALT648
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court ordered Notice before admission on 3-7-2007 and also made an order:Pending further orders, status quo obtaining as on today as to the management of Sri Sivaramakrishna Kshetram, Vijayawada shall be maintained for a period of one week from today.Further, the said interim order was extended for one week from 10-7-2007 and further on 13-7-2007 and also on 20-7-2007 the interim order was extended from time to time. On 14-9-2007, this Court made the following order:The authority of Principal Secretary to Government to make the impugned order is called in question. The Counsel for vacate petitioner is raising a preliminary objection relating to the very maintainability of the Writ Petition on the ground that the writ petitioner is not an aggrieved party and the writ petitioner has no locus standi to question the same.and issued rule nisi and called for records.2. W.V.M.P. No. 1847/2007 is filed by the 5th respondent to vacate the interim order specified ab...
Ruchi Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. the Food Inspector, Division-ii
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)711; 2007(3)ALT(Cri)347
ORDERG.V. Seethapathy, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the prosecution of the petitioner/A-3 in C.C.No.150 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Huzurnagar, for the offences under Sections 7(i) and 2(ia)(m) read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short 'the Act').2. The case of the respondent-complainant, the Food Inspector Division-I, Nalgonda District, is that on 13.11.2003 at about 11-15 a.m. the Food Inspector along with his attender in the presence of mediators inspected Pragathi Enterprises, situated in Door No. 1-67/2, Main Road, Huzurnagar, and the vendor A-1 was present at the time of inspection and the Food Inspector found about 75 Nos. of Ruchi No. l Vanaspathi sealed in 100 ml. Packets and A-1 stated that they are meant for human consumption and kept for sale and suspecting the same to be adulterated, the Food Inspector purchased sample packets of Ruchi No. 1 Vanaspat...
Dr. K. Ashok Reddy Vs. K. Ramchandra Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD708
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 162 of 1984 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Warangal, filed this second appeal. Respondents 1 and 2 are his brothers.2. The appellant filed the suit initially, against his father and two brothers, for partition of the suit schedule properties. During the pendency of the suit, his father died and since his estate is represented by the appellant and respondents 1 and 2 herein, no other individuals were added as parties.3. The appellant pleaded that the joint family, comprising of himself and his brothers, is possessed of 'A', 'B' and 'C' schedule properties and in spite of his repeated requests, the respondents did not effect partition. The 1st respondent herein remained ex parte in the suit. The suit was contested by the 2nd respondent alone. He pleaded that there was a partition of the joint family properties in the year 1973 and that a list of partition was prepared on 30.04.1973. He further pleaded that subseq...
Surana Securities Ltd. Rep. by Sri Ravinder Singh S/O R.B. Singh Vs. S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ1221
T. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against the order of acquittal passed by the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, by his judgment dated 30th October, 2001 in C.C. No. 18 of 2000.2. The unsuccessful complainant which is a private limited company is the appellant. It filed the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, the Act'). The complainant's case in nutshell is thus:The complainant is a member of the National Stock Exchange of India and a registered broker carrying on business in shares and securities. The accused was a client of the complainant company and used to trade in shares. In the process, he became liable to pay an amount of Rs. 7, 21,174.47 ps. The accused after verifying his accounts with the complainant, admitted and acknowledged the liability and in discharge of the said liability issued six cheques, each for Rs.1, 00,000/- and another cheque for Rs. 1, 21,174.47 ps, drawn on Andhra Bank on different dat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »