Andhra Pradesh Court August 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Shoukath Ali Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour Court and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-2007
Reported in: 2007(6)ALT432; [2008(116)FLR244]; (2008)ILLJ969AP
G.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. The appellant, who is one among many thousand beneficiaries of the fraudulent employment market, which has grown in this country in last three decades, succeeded in persuading the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal to accept his plea for invalidation of the action taken by the employer to terminate his service, but did not feel satisfied with the award of reinstatement with continuity of service and other benefits except back wages, invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for mandating the respondents to pay him full back wages by claiming that the termination of his service without complying with the provisions of Section 25-F read with Section 25-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, 'the Act') has the effect of rendering the action of the employer as nullity and the learned Presiding Officer committed a jurisdictional error by refusing the relief of reinstatement with back wage...
Kurni Banda Thiripalaiah (Died) by Lrs. Vs. Atmakur Nagabhushanam Chet ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD626; 2008(2)ALT383
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri M.V. Subba Reddy, Counsel representing the appellants and Sri D. Ranganath Kumar, Counsel representing the respondents.2. Sri Subba Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the present appellants, the legal representatives of the deceased 1st appellant had taken this Court through the respective pleadings of the parties and the evidence available on record and would point out that in the light of the clear evidence of D.W. 1 and D.W. 2 to the effect that there was no passing of consideration in relation to the mortgage transaction in question, attaching some importance to the endorsement made by the Sub-Registrar and decreeing the suit cannot be sustained. The learned Counsel also would maintain that it may be that D.W. 1 can be taken to be an interested witness but the evidence of D.W. 2 is available on record. The evidence of D.W. 2 being independent evidence, much weight to be given to the said evidence. The Counsel also had taken this Court through the ...
Kurapati Lakshmaiah and ors. Vs. Additional Agent to Government and Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD840; 2008(3)ALT805
V.V.S. Rao, J.1. Introduction and Background:The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are residents of different villages in either Khammam District or East Godavari District in State of Andhra Pradesh. Some Taluks/Mandals in these two districts are scheduled areas having been statutorily notified as such long back. All the petitioners do not belong to Scheduled Tribes (in this order they are referred to as non-tribals). They own agricultural lands in their villages. They allege that either they or their ancestors or predecessors-in-title purchased from other non-tribals under agreements of sale and other transfer documents. In some cases, they also claim that they were granted ryotwari patta under relevant law.2. The jurisdictional Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare) (SDC, for brevity) initiated action under Section 3(2) of Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 (Regulation No. I of 1959), as amended by Regulation I of 1970 (the Regulation, for brev...
Ramireddygari Virupaksha Reddy and Six ors. Vs. R. Prakash Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD658
P.S. Narayana, J.1. On 13.8.1998 this Court made the following order:In view of the substantial question of law raised in ground No. 4, the Second Appeal is admitted.The substantial questions of law specified above are as hereunder:(i) Whether the lower appellate Court is right and justified in reversing the well considered judgment of the trial Court based on the substantial evidence as held by the Supreme Court in Surain Singh v. Mehenga reported in : [1996]1SCR1152 (ii) Whether the lower appellate Court is right and correct in reverse the judgment of the trial Court on the ground that relying on the evidence of defendants the suit cannot be decreed?2. Sri A.V. Sivaiah, learned Counsel representing the appellants would maintain that this is a suit for specific performance on the strength of an oral agreement of sale and the said oral agreement of sale had been clearly proved by the voluminous oral and documentary evidence available on record apart from certain admissions made by DWs....
B. Madhu Vs. State
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ20
P. Swaroop Reddy, J.1. The sole appellant, who was the accused in S.C. No. 569 of 2004 on the file of the learned Special Judge for the trial of offences under SCs and STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-XX Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad at Secunderabad, was convicted for the offence under Section 376(2)(f) read with 511, IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs. 100.00 in default to suffer simple imprisonment for fifteen days.2. The prosecution case is that the accused and the parents of the victim, Lavanya were neighbours at Indirammanagar, Rasoolpura, Hyderabad. On 28-11-2003 between 3.30 and 4.15 p.m., the victim, who was aged five years at that time, went into the house of the accused along with some others for watching T.V. The accused sent away other children and committed rape on the victim, who came home weeping and informed her mother (P.W. 1); there was bleeding from her (victim) priv...
Annepu Vykunta Rao and anr. Vs. Annepu Vasudeva Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD819
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The Court on 22.7.1998 made the following order:Heard, in view of the substantial questions of law raised in ground Nos. 9(a) to (f) of the Memorandum of Appeal, the second appeal is admitted.It may be appropriate to have a look a the said grounds specified as 'a' to 'f under ground No. 9, which are as hereunder:(a) Whether under law, the ages stated in the cause title of the deposition form before the oath was administered, amounts to a statement on oath and evidence or admissions on the part of the plaintiffs ?(b) Whether the positive evidence of PWs. l and 2 given on oath about the ages of the plaintiffs can be ignored in view of same ages noted in the deposition form under law ?(c) Whether under law, self-serving statements made in Exs.A4 to A6, Bl and B3, B19 to B23 that there was a prior partition to support the validity of the alienations made thereunder bind the minors under law?(d) Whether the appellate Court committed a grave error of law, in not deciding,...
Chundru Narayana Vs. the Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)250
ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. Petitioner seeks a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings in Rc.No.145/2007/A-4 dated 16.06.2007 on the file of the Prohibition & Excise, Superintendent in respect of C.C.No.2 of 2005 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate - cum - Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru and to quash the same and to direct the first respondent to compound the offence in C.C.No.2 of 2005.2. Petitioner submits that the Inspector of Prohibition and Excise Station, Tadepalligudem, registered a case in Cr.No.24 of 1998-99 for the offence punishable under Section 8(b)(ii) of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995 (for short 'the Act') showing him as A-1 along with two others as A-2 and A-3. After completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed, which was numbered as C.C.No.637 of 1999 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Excise), West Godavari District, Eluru, now pending on the file o...
Godugula Adellu S/O Malkanna Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Public Pros ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ206
D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard the earned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State.2. Appellant is the accused No. 1 in the Sessions Case.3. This Criminal Appeal, by the accused No. 1, under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the judgment, dated 21.03.2005, in Sessions Case No. 447 of 2003, passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Adilabad, convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for brevity 'IPC') and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and also convicting for the offence punishable under Section 498A IPC and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two months, directing to run both the sentences concurrently.4. The gravam...
K. Bharathi and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2007
Reported in: 2007(6)ALD86
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioners were granted house site pattas over an extent of 33.33 sq. yards, each, in T.S. No. 4/1, Block-M, of Ward No. 47, Nampally Mandal, Hyderabad, in the year 1995. That area was covered by notification dated 12-12-1991, issued under Section 3 of the A.P. Slum Improvement (Acquisition of Lands) Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act').2. Recently, the Government allotted an extent of 5117.68 sq. yards of land, in favour of Indian National Congress Party, vide G.O. Ms. No. 76, dated 25-11-2005. This land included the plots, that were assigned to the petitioners. Apprehending eviction from the land, petitioners filed W.P. No. 25905 of 2005. The respondents filed a counter-affidavit, stating that they would not dispossess the petitioners, except by following the procedure, prescribed by law. The writ petition was disposed of, on 19-12-2006, duly recording the undertaking given by the respondents. This was followed by another writ petition, being W.P. No. 49...
Loyola Public School Society Vs. P. Anil Kumar and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD8; 2007(5)ALT586
T. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. These two appeals can be disposed of together since they emanate from a common judgment and decrees dated 3rd January, 2003 passed by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.A.S. No. 873 of 2003 has been filed qua die judgment and decree passed in OS No. 262 of l995. AS No. 874 of 2003 has been filed qua the judgment and decree in OS No. 500 of 1993. The unsuccessful first defendant in both the suits is the appellant.2. The facts leading to file the instant appeals may be stated thus:The first defendant in both the suits is the institution known as the Loyola Public School Society, situate at Father Balaiahnagar, old Alwal, Secunderabad. The second defendant was its former President. The first defendant filed a suit in OS No. 291 of 1987 on the file of the Additional Sub-Judge, Rangareddy District at Saroornagar against the plaintiffs in both the suits and the second defendant, Father, Balaiahnagar Co-operative H...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »