Andhra Pradesh Court August 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Vijaya Chandra Vs. Andhra University and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD136
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was admitted into M.A. History, in the College of Arts and Commerce, Andhra University, at Visakhapatnam. He was also admitted into the hostel in the campus of the University. He was issued a show-cause notice dated 14.6.2003, by the Registrar of the University, the 1st respondent, stating inter alia that the petitioner and certain others have incited the inmates of the hostel on 9.11.2002, on the pretext that worms were found in a curry, served in the mess. It was alleged that they resorted to manipulate it, by adding worms to the curry, and spoiled the peaceful atmosphere in the campus on 9th and 10th November 2002. An enquiry was said to have been instituted, into the matter, and in the report filed therein, the petitioner and others were found guilty. On that basis, the petitioner was required to explain, as to why his admission into the college shall not be cancelled.2. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 20.6.2003. Not being sa...
Majeti Veerabhadrarao and ors. Vs. Pithapuram Municipality Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD247; 2008(1)ALT729
V.V.S. Rao, J.1. The appellants are the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 148 of 1990 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Pithapuram. They filed the suit for declaration that the special notice dated 29-9-1988 issued by the respondents/defendant's Municipality levying half-yearly tax on their properties at Rs. 4,052.70 and Rs. 2,392.10 is illegal, capricious and arbitrary. They also sought consequential injunction restraining the defendants from collecting the same. By judgment dated 29-6-1998, the suit was dismissed, which was confirmed in A.S. No.10 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Pithapuram. Aggrieved by the same, the present second appeal is filed.2. The plaintiffs are owners of huge extent of urban property admeasuring Acs. 0.99 in survey No. 245 in Pithapuram, which is allegedly a garden land with two properties assessed to property tax with assessment Nos. 475 and 476 respectively. They alleged that the property was divided among four groups of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›