Andhra Pradesh Court May 2007 Judgments

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kollareddy Motilal Reddy and Anoth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mrs. M. Shreesha, President (I/c): Oral: 1. Aggrieved by the order in C.D. No. 78/1996 on the file of District Forum, Machilipatnam, opposite party No. 2 preferred F.A. 204/2004 and F.A. 505/2005 has been preferred by opposite party No. 1 under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act. Since both these appeals arise out of same complaint they are being disposed of by a common order. 2. The brief facts as set out in the case are that since the complainants daughter Ms. Madhavi aged about 15 years was suffering from throat pain, the complainant took her to opposite party No. 1 doctor on 10.6.1996 and on examination, opposite party No. 1 doctor prescribed some medicines stating that the patient was suffering from tonsils. Again on 26.6.1996 the complainant got her daughter tested in opposite party No. 1 hospital wherein various tests were conducted on the patient and the opposite party No. 1 fixed the date for conducting operation on 28.6.1996. Accordingly, the complainant had taken the ...

Kommana Veera Raju and Others Vs. Lic of India and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mrs. Merla Shreesha, I/c President: 1. Aggrieved by the order in C.D. No. 775 of 2003 dated 8.6.2004 on the file of District Forum Visakhapatnam the complainants prefered this appeal. 2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants are the legal representatives of late K. Raja Rao who took LIC policies among other policies for an assured sum of Rs. 7,00,000 from the first opposite party on 28.7.2000 paying a premium amount of Rs. 38,137 and the first complainant is the nominee of the policy holder. The complainants submit that by the date of policy, the policy holder was hale and hearty and the policy was issued only after thorough medical examination by the panel doctor. The said Raja Rao also took two more policies from the first opposite party for an assured sum of Rs. 25,000 and Rs. 50,000 which claims were settled by opposite party No. 1 but refused to pay the policy amount of Rs. 7 lakh under the policy bond No. 691476187. Opposite party repudiated the cl...

Lalitha Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(3)ALT693

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Smt. Lalitha, w/o. Banoth Sammaiah, filed the present Writ Petition praying for a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenu by name Banoth Sammaiah s/o.Balu Naik, aged 28 years, R/o. K.K. Nagar Mandal, Kamanpur of Karimnagar District and set him at liberty by declaring the detention order dated 7-4-2007 in Re. No. 306/2007/P & Ex/A3 passed by the 2nd respondent and the order in G.O.Rt. No. 1942, General Administration (Law and Order. II) Department dated 12-4-2007 passed by the 1st respondent approving the detention order as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Act No. 1 of 1986 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass such other suitable orders.2. It is stated that the petitioner is a resident of K.K. Nagar, Godavarikhani of Kamanpur Mandal of Karimnagar District and eking out livelihood by working as a daily agricultural labour and she is the wife of the detenu by name Banoth Sammaiah and her husband ...

Charminar Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. Rep. by Its Chief Recovery Offi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2007AP339; 2007(5)ALD128; 2007(4)ALT337

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri P.S. Rajasekhar, learned Counsel representing Sri Abhinand Kumar Shavali, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant.2. The Charminar Co-operative Urban bank Limited, Hyderabad, represented by its chief Recovery Officer-petitioner-appellant, (sic) the present application to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the judgment and decree including typed copy of the decree vendered by the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad in of 2002, dated 10-11-2003, and pass such other suitable orders.3. This application is filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'Code' for the purpose of convenience). In paragraph Nos. 3 to 13 of the affidavit filed in support of the application, several reasons had been narrated and ultimately a request was made to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the judgment and decree including the typed copy of the decree rendered by the I ...

Pratap Karan and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by Its P ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALT334

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Vedula Venkatramana and the learned Advocate General.This application is filed to dispense with the certified copy and also the typed copy of the decree made in O.S. No. 155 of 2005. dated 30-4-2005, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad.2. It is not in serious controversy that the learned Principal District Judge, Rangareddy District had delivered an elaborate judgment on 30-4-2005 in O.S. No. 155 of 2005. The said application is filed under Order 20 Rule 6-A of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as 'Code' for the purpose of convenience).3. Order 20 Rule 6-A of the Code deals with preparation of decree and the provision reads as hereunder:Preparation of decree:- (1) Every endeavour shall be made to ensure that the decree is drawn up as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within fifteen days from the date on which the judgment is pronounced.(2) An appeal may be preferred against ...

L. Kiran Kumar and ors. Vs. Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD23; 2007(3)ALT579

ORDERR. Subhash Reddy, J.1. Though these cases are listed for admission, but, in view of the urgency expressed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners and as counter affidavit has been filed, at their request, they are heard finally at the stage of admission and are disposed of by this common order.2. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are the students of M.B.B.S. course studying in various private medical colleges affiliated to N.T.R. University of Health Sciences. They were admitted into the said course durnig the academic year 2006-07 and appeared for the first year examinations, which were conducted from 5th September, 2006 to 10th October, 2006. The results were published in the newspapers and simultaneously were communicated to the students through respective Principals of various colleges in the State. While announcing the results, it was notified to the students that applications for personal identification and retotalling can be submitted on or before 13-12-2006 a...

Arif Noorul Hassan Rep. by Gpa Holder, Mehdi Ali and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALT69

ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J.1. Since all these matters involve the same subject matter and commonly touching questions, they are taken up together for disposal.2. In W.P. No. 28470 of 1995, which was filed on 15-12-1995, the petitioners, who are the legal heirs of Abdul Basith, seek a Writ of Certiorari assailing the orders in L.G.C. No. 46/89, dated 30-10-1995 on the file of the Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act at Hyderabad, dismissing their application filed under Section 8(1) of the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (for brevity the 'Act') to declare the respondents as land grabbers and seek eviction and consequent reliefs in respect of the property admeasuring Acs.6.34 guntas in Sy. No. 129/51 (old) new Sy. No. 328 situated in Shaikpet Village, Golconda Revenue Mandal, Hyderabad District. These proceedings are filed against the respondents, who include the Government as the first respondent and V.R.K. Sastry as fifth respondent and M/s. Kaushik Co-op...

P. Vijayalakshmi Devi and anr. Vs. Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet Ma ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD1

B. Prakash Rao, J. 1. Since all these writ petitions are directed against the common order, dated 20.9.2006, passed in I.A. Nos. 1407 and 1253 of 2004; and 224 and 53 of 2005 in L.G.C. No. 87 of 1998 on the file of the Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, at Hyderabad (for short 'the Special Court'), they are heard together and are being taken up together for disposal.2. Heard Sri M.P. Chandramouli, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri M. Subba Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents 2 and 3.3. The petitioners herein, who are respondents 3 and 4 in the aforesaid interlocutory applications and also the respondents in the main L.G.C. No. 87 of 1998 on the file of the Special Court, filed these writ petitions inter alia seeking for a writ of certiorari assailing the correctness of the common order, dated 20.9.2006, passed in I.A. No. 1407 of 2004 and batch in the said L.G.C. No. 87 of 1998, allowing the ap...

Jujjavarapu Yesurao Vs. Nadakuduru Kamala Kumar and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD140; 2007(6)ALT249

V.V.S. Rao, J.1. Immovable property bearing House No. 578 with appurtenant land of 521 square yards in Ward No. 7 (Ward No. 30 new) situated at Malakapatnam of Machilipatnam in Krishna District was the ancestral property of one Subbamma, W/o. Nathaniel. She executed registered gift deed, dated 20-4-1965 in favour of her son, Nadakuduru Raja Rao, S/o. Nathaniel. He had three sons, namely Prabhakara Rao, Vijaya Kumar and Kamala Kumar. Along with his two sons except Kamala Kumar, Raja Rao executed registered sale deed, dated 12-2-1979 in favour of one Brahmaiah. After his death, his wife, Victoria sold the property to Jujjavarapu Yesu Rao (plaintiff) under registered sale deed, dated 16-8-1982 duly delivering possession to him. On 30-12-1982, Kamala Kumar, third son of Raja Rao, S/o. Nathaniel, filed O.S. No. 552 of 1982 for partition and separate possession of suit schedule property. He arrayed his father, brothers and Jujjavarapu Yesu Rao as defendants to the suit. The trial Court dismi...

B. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman, Nalgondaranga Reddy District Milk Produc ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(6)ALT681

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. The constitutional and legal validity of the Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance 2 of 2006 and the consequential Government Orders and Proceedings are under challenge in this batch of writ petitions. On replacement of the Ordinance by the Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act 20 of 2006, W.P. No. 3275 of 2006 was permitted to be amended for the purpose of challenging the constitutionality and vires of the Amendment Act without the necessity of filing formal applications for the purpose in the other petitions.2. The Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 is hereinafter referred to as '1964 Act' and the Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995 is referred to as '1995 Act'. The Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Corporation is referred to as 'the Corporation' and the Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Co-operative Federation Limited is referred to as 'the Federation'....