Andhra Pradesh Court April 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Veluru Satish and ors. Vs. Chittaturu Sailaja and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-19-2007
Reported in: 2007(5)ALD257; 2007(5)ALT222
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. These two revisions are directed against the common order dated 20-3-2006, passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. By the said common order, the applications in I.A. Nos. 578 and 579 of 2005 in O.S. No.88 of 2004, filed by the respondents-defendants, one seeking to set aside the ex parte decree dated 19-8-2004 and the other seeking to enlarge time for filing written statement by condoning the delay of 429 days, was allowed.2. Few facts necessary for the disposal of the C.R.Ps. may be noted, and they run thus:3. The respondents-defendants, in the affidavit filed in support of the I.As., stated that they entrusted the vakalat to one Sri Sanjeeva Kumar, Advocate. During the pendency of the suit, he died. According to them, they requested the counsel to file written statement on their behalf, but for the reasons best known to him, he did not file. There is no negligence on their part. The period of limitation to file the written statement was over by ...
National Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Sha ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2008ACJ1367; 2007(4)ALD188; 2007(3)ALT499
D.S.R. Varma, J. 1. Heard both sides.2. Aggrieved by the order and decree, dated 10-7-2002, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Nellore, (for brevity 'the Tribunal'), allowing the petition O.P. No. 690 of 1996, filed under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'), awarding a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/-, as was claimed in the O.P., for the death of one Shaik Basha Mohiddin (for brevity 'the deceased'), in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 23-5-1996, the National Insurance Company Limited has filed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal; while the petitioners in the O.P., have filed the Cross-objections, seeking enhancement.3. The application C.M.P. No. 15822 of 2004, which is filed under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking permission of this Court to amend the compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- claimed in the O.P., to Rs. 5,00,000/-, is hereby ordered.4. Appellant is the National Insu...
A. Rajeshwar Rao and ors. Vs. Hasan Ali Khan and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ALD774
ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J.1. Since these two revisions arise out of the same proceedings in one suit, they are taken up together for disposal.2. Heard Sri D. Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri M.S. Ramachandra Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri M. V.S. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.3. The petitioners in both these revisions are the plaintiffs in the Court below, who seek to assail the orders dated 5-1-2004 in I.A. No. 1 317 of 2000 and also the consequent orders passed in I.A. No. 1233 of 2000 in O.S. No. 2 17 of 1999 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad.4. Briefly stated the facts of the case without going into much details as to the chequered events and also various pleas as raised on behalf of both the sides on merits, it would suffice for the purpose of disposal of these revisions are that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed the present suit, inter alia, to declare that ...
Mohammad Vajahath HussaIn @ Fasi Vs. the Special Court Under A.P. Land ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2007(5)ALD6
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The petitioner seeks a writ of Certiorari to quash the order, dated 16-11-2000, passed by the learned Special Court and the order dated 13-06-1997 passed by the learned Special Tribunal in L.G.A. No.30 of 1997 and L.G.O.P. No. 5 of 1990 respectively after calling for the records pertaining thereto, on the premise that the orders have been passed without jurisdiction.2. The unsuccessful respondent is the writ petitioner and the second respondent herein is the applicant.3. The facts lie in a narrow compass : The applicant filed L.G.O.P. No. 5 of 1990 on the file of the Chairman, Special Tribunal under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act-cum-District Judge, Adilabad, against the respondent under Section 7-A of the said Act. That application was filed on the premise that the applicant purchased the house bearing No. 4-3-65 along with the appurtenant land under a registered sale deed dated 05-02-1969 and she was the owner thereof and that the respondent forc...
Khaja RaheemuddIn Vs. Conservator of Forests and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)ALD580
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Petitioner was granted Saw Mill licence in the year 1976. He was issued a show-cause notice, dated 24-5-2005, by the Divisional Forest Officer, Karimnagar, the second respondent herein. It was pointed out that there are discrepancies in the quantities of timber, dealt with by the petitioner under various permits. It was also alleged that there is a difference of quantity of timber between the one, found on physical verification and the one, entered in the Stock Register. It is stated that the petitioner submitted a representation on 13-6-2005, to the second respondent to furnish the copies of certain documents, based on which, the show cause notice was issued. The request is said to have been reiterated in the representations, dated 2-8-2005 and 8-2-2006. The petitioner contends that without considering his request and without giving adequate opportunity to him, the second respondent passed an order, dated 23-2-2006, directing cancellation of the Saw Mill ...
Doobasi Satyavathi Vs. Hari Gopal Lunani and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2007(5)ALD153
V. Eswaraiah, J.1. The appellant is the claimant, who filed O.P. No. 1807 of 1999 on the file of Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District Judge, Visakapatnam, claiming compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- for the injuries sustained by her in the accident occurred on 2-10-1999 due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry bearing No. AP-5X-5652. The 1st respondent is the owner while the 2nd respondent is the insurer of the said lorry.2. The Tribunal, after considering the oral and documentary evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the said lorry.3. Insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned, as against the claim of Rs.1,50,000/-, the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.25,000/- only along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Aggrieved by the said quantum of compensation, the appellant-claimant filed this appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation.4. For the sake of convenience, t...
Apsrtc Vs. Shaik Yousuf Pasha
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2007(5)ALD439
G. Chandraiah, J.1. Heard both the Counsel.2. Aggrieved by the order and decree dated 29.3.2001 passed by the Court of the Chairman Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Additional District Judge), Warangal in M.V.O.P. No. 888 of 1999 the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation') filed the present appeal.3. The case of the claimant is that he was working as Ghumastha (clerk) and earning an amount of Rs. 1,500/- per month. On 18.1.1998 while he was going on scooter bearing No. ATS 7656 from Hanamakonda to Warangal, bus of the Corporation bearing No. AP 9Z 8724 came in the opposite direction and hit the scooter and as a result he received grievous injuries to the head and fracture of his left leg and immediately he was shifted to M.G.M. Hospital, Warangal for treatment and that he was treated at M.G.M. Hospital, Warangal and also at private hospitals and he spent an amount of Rs. 45,000/- towards medicines and extra nourishment and that he became perman...
Sarojamma and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer-cum-rdo
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2007(5)ALD500; 2008(1)ALT23
ORDERR. Subhash Reddy, J. 1. As the issues involved in these two writ petitions are interrelated, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. In Writ Petition No. 35924 of 1998, the petitioners, who are the owners of the land admeasuring 9.00 acres covered by Sy. Nos. 518, 520 and 522 of Uppununthala Village in Mahaboobnagar District, have questioned the Award passed by the respondent in File No. B/2431/90, dated 25-9-1997 to the extent of treating the same as consent award.3. Writ Petition No. 35925 of 1998 has been filed questioning the order dated 16-10-1997 in Memo No. B/2431/90, by which the request of the petitioners for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was rejected.4. The petitioners were the owners and possessors of the land admeasuring 9.00 acres covered by Sy. Nos. 518, 520 and 522 of Uppununthala Village in Mahaboobnagar District. The said land was a private patta land and the same was taken possession by the responde...
Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Myakala Sulochana ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
Reported in: 2009ACJ1675; 2007(6)ALD738
G. Chandraiah, J.1. As the three appeals are connected and arise out of the same accident and the Court below disposed of the matters by common judgment, all the three appeals are also being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The Insurance Company is the appellant in all the three appeals. CMA No. 30/2000 is filed challenging the order dated 30.8.1999 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy in O.P. No. 32/1999 in granting compensation of Rs. 50,000/- under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.3. MA CMA Nos. 2739 and 2740 of 2006 have been filed challenging the common order dated 5.5.2005 passed by the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) at Medak in M.V.O.P. Nos. 33/1999 and 128/2004.4. It appears that the deceased had two wives and both the wives filed different claim petitions in different Courts and by virtue of the orders of this Court dated 10.2.2003 in Tr. CMP No. 412/2002, both the claim...
R.A. Nagireddy Vs. District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ALT620
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a declaration that the petitioner is entitled for additional remuneration payable to the Additional Public Prosecutor in the Assistant Sessions Judge's Court at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- p.m. from 1-8-1995 to 30-6-1997 and Rs. 4,000/- p.m. from 1-7-1997 onwards towards the services rendered by him as in-charge Additional Public Prosecutor and for a consequential direction to the respondents to pay him all arrears including arrears of Rs. 37,5007- towards his remuneration as an Assistant Government Pleader, Penukonda.2. Sri. R.N. Hemandranath Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, would fairly submit that the petitioner has since been paid the arrears of remuneration as an Assistant Government Pleader and the relief sought for is restricted only for payment of remuneration for the services discharged by him as an in-charge Additional Public Prosecutor in the Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Penukonda.3. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »