Andhra Pradesh Court March 2007 Judgments

Lanka Anjaneyulu Vs. Saptagiri Grameena Bank and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD56

ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. The proceedings dated 28.4.1992 of the Kanakadurga Grameena Bank, (for short 'the Bank') represented by its Chairman, Gudivada, Krishna District, which received affirmation by the Board of Directors of the Bank, vide proceedings dated 19.10.1995 are the subject-matter of challenge in the present writ petition. Through the former proceedings, the petitioner's services were terminated, which termination was affirmed by the latter proceedings.2. The brief facts leading to the dispute are narrated hereinbelow:3. The 1st respondent-bank was sponsored by Indian Bank, one of the nationalized banks. This bank has about 30 branches in Krishna District with its Head Office situated in Gudivada, Krishna District. The bank opened its branch at Vallanki Village, Veerulapadu Mandal on 29.12.1986. The petitioner was engaged as a Sweeper on 30.12.1986 by the Branch Manager. From the stage of daily-wage to start with, the petitioner started receiving consolidated pay fro...

Annam Malla Reddy Vs. Bangi Nagaiah and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD43

P.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court on 5-2-1998 made the following order:Heard.This second appeal is admitted to consider the following substantial question of law:Whether the appellate Court failed to exercise jurisdiction in not considering I.A. No. 734 of 1994 filed in AS No. 50 of 1993 for additional evidence and as such the findings ultimately recorded are vitiated?This Court in CMP No. 15455 of 1997 granted interim stay of drawing up the final decree and all other proceedings till that stage shall go on.2. Sri P.V. Narayana Rao, the learned Counsel representing the appellants had pointed out that this specific ground was raised as a substantial question of law in ground No. 7(e) of the grounds of second appeal. Incidentally, the learned Counsel also had pointed out to the other substantial questions of law raised by him shown as ground No. 7(a), (b), (c) and (d) and the said grounds read as under:7(a) Whether it is necessary under Section 8 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act to ob...

Dr. Macha Mohandas Vs. Kareemunnissa Begum

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD450

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri V. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Counsel representing the appellant and Sri Srinivas, learned Counsel representing the respondent.2. On 3-7-1998, this Court made the following order:Admit.Ground Nos. 1, 3 and 4 framed by the appellant's Counsel in the Memo filed on 24-3-1998 are the substantial questions of law to be decided in the second appeal.The said grounds reads as hereunder:(1) The order under appeal is contrary to law, justice and facts of the case.(2) That the Court below ought to have seen that there was no breach of obligation existing in favour of the respondent either expressly or by implication as on the date of filing of the suit against the appellant herein.(3) That the Court below ought to have seen that the conduct of the respondent/plaintiff was such that she is not entitled to any assistance from the Court for the reliefs as sought for.This Court in CMP No. 13106 of 1997 made the following order:Post before the Civil Admission Court after 2 wee...

Life Information Corporation of India and Another Vs. Mohammadi Sultan ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mrs. Merla Shreesha, Member: 1. Aggrieved by the order in CD No. 717 of 2002 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad complainant preferred F.A. 1046/2004 and F.A. 1316/2004 has been preferred by the opposite parties under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act. Since both the appeals arise out of common order in CD. 717/2002 they are being disposed of by a common order. 2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is wife of late Mohd. Akber Shareef who has taken two policies while working as Lineman and Driver in A.P. Transco bearing No. 641476874 on 15.9.1999 and another Policy bearing No. 641478387 on 28.3.2000 for Rs. 1.00 lakh each. Complainants husband paid the premium for the first policy @ Rs. 626 p.m. and Rs. 632 p.m. for the second policy and both these policies were for a term of 15 years. On 5.6.2000 complainants husband was admitted to Farooqi Nursing Home, Moghulpura, Hyderabad on account of massive heart attack while driving the office je...

Chantam Reddy Manjunath Reddy Vs. Palm Grove Nursery

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mrs. Merla Shreesha, Member: Oral: 1. Aggrieved by the order in C.D. No. 125 of 2002 on the file of District Forum, Kadapa, the complainant preferred this appeal. 2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants family possesses lands to an extent of Ac 6.34 in Sy. No. 690/3 and 690/4 of Kothapalli Village. The complainant gave an order for 7500 banana plants to the agent of opposite party No. 1 company and went to the opposite partys office on 4.10.2000 and paid Rs. 25,000 as an advance for supply of 5000 banana plants of Robesta category and 2,500 plants of Semocolon America category. Opposite party issued a receipt dated 4.10.2000 in favour of the complainant for Rs. 25,000 and the complainant further paid an amount of Rs. 35,000 on 20.3.2001 towards final payment to the opposite party. Vide invoice No. 152 dated 2.3.2001 the opposite party supplied the said plants of 7500 on two dates i.e., 30.3.2001 and 2.4.2001 and the complainant planted the same to the e...

Mula Rama Devi (Smt.) Vs. Collector and District Registrar and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2007AP262; 2007(4)ALD273; 2007(4)ALT158

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.5-17 guntas of land in Sy.N.155/A of Nemaragomula village of Bibinagar Mandal, Nalgonda District, through a sale deed dated 18-12-2003. The value of the land was mentioned in the basic value register, maintained by the 2nd respondent, as Rs. 63,000/- per acre. The Department of Stamps and Registration itself furnished the details of valuation of the property as Rs. 3,41,775/-. The stamp duty and registration charges were specified at Rs. 20,520/- and Rs. 1,710/- respectively. Petitioner paid the said amounts, and the 2nd respondent registered the document.2. The 1st respondent caused an inspection of the records of the 2nd respondent. He issued notice dated 15-5-2006 to the petitioner under Section 41 -A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short 'the Act'). According to him, the value of the property, covered by the document, works out to Rs. 19,69,275/-; stamp duty of Rs. 2,16,640/- and registration fee Rs. 9,850/- ough...

Gandepalli Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Korpu La ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD377

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This batch of writ petitions is filed by the Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited, Gandepali of East Godavari District, aggrieved by the orders passed by the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, in various miscellaneous applications filed in a batch of original applications before it.2. One Sri Korpu Latchayya Dora, first respondent in W.P. No. 4479 of 2007, functioned as the President of the society for a term from 1982 to 1995. It is alleged that during his tenure, he raised loans of different categories in the name of himself and his relatives, who figured as first respondent in other writ petitions, amounting to approximately about Rs. 26 lakhs. On finding that the loan amounts were not paid together with accrued interest, the petitioner initiated proceedings under Section 71 of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act') before the third respondent. After following the procedure prescribed under the Ac...

Madepalli Madhu Vs. Grandhi Ramu and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD855

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The matter is appearing under the caption 'Interlocutory'. Both the Counsel on record made elaborate submissions and a request also was made for final disposal of the civil miscellaneous appeal. Hence, this civil miscellaneous appeal is being disposed of finally.2. Sri V.V.N. Narasimham, learned Counsel representing appellant would submit that the learned VIII Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry, had totally erred in dismissing the LA. No. 828 of 2006 in A.S. No. 177 of 2005 for the reason that the matter was posted for arguments and the Counsel representing the appellant argued for sometime and the matter was adjourned for further arguments and without giving further opportunity to make a reply as contemplated by Order XLI Rule 16(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the Code' for the purpose of convenience) the judgment was made, and hence, the said judgment cannot be said to be a judgment in the eye of law, and...

P. Venkateswarlu Vs. Commissioner Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)14VST245(AP)

ORDERBilal Nazki, J.1. All these writ petitions raise same questions of law and fact. Therefore, they are being disposed of together by this common order. Facts are taken from W. P. No. 1957 of 2007.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. These writ petitions have been filed seeking a direction that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 should not insist for payment of arrears of tax pertaining to third respondent from the petitioner and should not take any steps to recover the arrears of tax allegedly due from respondent No. 3 for the years 1994-95 and 1995-96. The counsel for the petitioner submits that he stood surety for respondent No. 3 for the year 1994-95 and an amount of Rs. 11,225 was outstanding, which, he had already paid. He submits that his surety stood for one assessment year and his surety with regard to respondent No. 3 was not perpetual and it could not be perpetual as has been held by two Division Benches of this Court in two judgments. One of the judgments passed by this Court is...

Gadiraju Narayana Raju and ors. Vs. Joint Collector and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(3)ALD355; 2007(3)ALT23

G.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. Having failed to persuade the learned Single Judge to accept their prayer for quashing order dated 18-12-2000 passed by Joint Collector, Khammam (respondent No. 1), the appellants have preferred this appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.2. The appellants 'are related to each other. Appellant No. 3 is the wife of appellant No. 1 and appellant No. 2 is the son of appellant Nos. 1 and 3. Appellant No. 1 was a native of West Godavari District till 1979. In 1979-1980, he settled down in Aswaraopet Village of Khammam District and by using his political clout, he could manage to get assignment of Ac.5-00 of land in Survey No. 1228 for himself and similar extents of land in the name of his three relatives, namely, Datla Ravi Kumar Varma, Penmathsa Balarama Raju and Gadiraju Ramachandra Raju. Appellant No. 1 also occupied land measuring Ac. 5-00 abutting to his land, which was assigned to landless poor person.3. It is borne out from the record that the lands assigne...