Andhra Pradesh Court December 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hanuman Vyas Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police, Vigilance Cell ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)54; 2008(1)ALT209
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The matter is coming up for admission.2. Heard Sri Ghanshyam Das Mandhani, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner and the learned G.P. for Civil Supplies.Sri Ghanshyam Das Mandhani, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner had placed strong reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in State of U.P. v. Mohammad Noon AIR 1958 SC 86 (1) and would maintain that the Writ Petition can be maintained. The learned Counsel also would submit that here is a case where the Special Court in violation of principles of natural justice had made an order and hence, the same can be challenged by filing a Writ of Certiorari. The Counsel also had drawn the attention of this Court to the distinction to be drawn between a Writ of Mandamus and also a Writ of Certiorari.3. Per contra, the learned G.P. for Civil Supplies would maintain that the writ petitioner is having an effective alternative remedy by way of a revision under Section 397 of the Criminal Proc...
Chinnakarasamma and ors. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD801; 2008(2)ALT596
G. Rohini, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in AAO No. 1460 of 1998, under which the learned Single Judge while allowing the appeal preferred by the Insurance Company in part, reduced the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal from Rs. 1,70,000/- to Rs. 70,296/-.2. The facts in brief are as under:The appellants herein are the claimants, who filed M.V.O.P. No. 78 of 1987 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Chittoor, claiming a compensation of Rs. 2,58,000/- for the death of one B. Muniappa in a motor accident on 24.7.1986. The said O.P. was contested by the Insurance Company-1st respondent herein as well as the 3rd respondent-owner of the vehicle. After considering the evidence adduced by the parties, both oral and documentary, the Tribunal by award dated 4.10.1988 having held that the death occurred due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the vehicle, awarded ...
Secretary, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) and ors. Vs. Dr. P.V. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD766; 2008(1)ALT503; [2008(117)FLR141]
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Though the matter has been at the interlocutory stage, the same has been heard at length and with the consent of both the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing and being disposed of finally.2. Heard learned standing counsel for the petitioners-Railways and the learned Counsel for the respondent.3. This Writ of Certiorari is filed seeking to quash the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad (for brevity 'the Tribunal') passed in O.A. No. 1600 of 2003, dated 12-10-2004, whereunder and whereby the Tribunal had directed the respondents therein (petitioners herein) to convert the punishment of dismissal of the applicant therein (respondent herein) from service into that of compulsory retirement.4. It seems that the respondent herein, while working as Medical Superintendent, South Central Railways, was found to have involved in the act of negligence in treating two patients because of which the lower part of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›