Andhra Pradesh Court November 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Sumakiran Mallena Vs. the Secretary, Medical and Health and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD176; 2008(3)ALT741
ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. An internal family squabble, pure and simple is sought to be given the colour of a constitutional issue in this writ petition.2. The facts of this case which raise more of ethical issues rather than any legal or constitutional issues and interesting as they are, run as under:3. The petitioner and respondent No.2 were married on 28.01.2007. Both are engineering graduates. While the petitioner is working as Software Analyst in a company at Secunderabad, respondent No.2 is employed as a Telecom Engineer in the United States of America. Respondent No.3, who is viewed as a thorn in the petitioner's flesh, is no other than the latter's father-in-law and respondent No.2's father. Respondent No.3 was diagnosed as suffering from decompensated cirrhosis of liver-HCV related incurable liver infection and was advised transplantation of liver.4. Evidently, moved by his father's plight, respondent No.2 prepared himself to donate a part of his liver to his father and h...
L. Venkata Krishna Reddy (Died) and ors. Vs. M. Anjappa (Died) Per L.R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD379; 2008(1)ALT260
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The unsuccessful judgment-debtors seek to assail the order dated 19-01-2007 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, in E.P.No. 50 of 1996 in O.S.No. 33 of 1985 in the instant revision petition.2. The respondents herein filed the E.P.No. 50 of 1996 under Order 21 Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'the Code') to direct the judgment debtors 1 to 3 and 5 to 8 to execute the sale deed pursuant to the decree dated 11-8-1992 passed by the Court for specific performance in O.S.No. 33 of 1985 after receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.2,50,000/- and to put the decree holders in possession of properties covered therein. That was objected to by the second judgment debtor on the premises that when the decree directed the original defendant in the suit to execute the sale deed by 21-09-1992, the decree holders deposited the balance sale consideration amount of Rs.2,50,000/- after a long lapse of time on 22-04-1995, although E.P. was...
Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Narala Venkata ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2007
Reported in: 2008ACJ551; 2008(2)ALD814; 2008(1)ALT9
D. Appa Rao, J.1. The United India Insurance Company Limited, R-2 in M.V.O.P. No. 310 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District Judge, Cuddapah, preferred this appeal against the order of awarding compensation of an amount of Rs. 15,00,000/-, on the death of the deceased by name N. Venkata Subba Reddy.2. The facts, in brief, are that the deceased Subba Reddy was working as Sales Officer in I.C.I. India Limited, Madras, Branch Office at Hyderabad. While so, on 16-6-1994 at about 11 a.m., when he was going on a vehicle Maruthy Gipsy bearing Regn. No. TSK 7129, the left front wheel of the vehicle burst, due to which, the vehicle was dragged to the left side of the road and dashed to a tree by the side of the road and as a result of which, he sustained bleeding injuries. Immediately, when he was shifted to the hospital by the villagers, on the way, he succumbed to the injuries. He was a bachelor, aged about 28 years, working as a Sales Officer. H...
Mallidi Suryanarayana Kanaka Durga Prasad Reddy Vs. Isukapalli Venkata ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2007
Reported in: 2009(3)ALT435
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. On 10.8.1998 this Court made the following order:This appeal is admitted to consider the following question of law:Whether the appellate Court is correct in reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court having held that Bapanamma had no pre-existing interest and as such Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act does not apply and consequently dismissed the plaintiff's suit on the ground that the impugned sale deeds were executed by the plaintiff's father for legal necessity, which fact is neither pleaded nor proved in the case on the basis of the material on record.2. Sri G. Krishna Murthy, learned Counsel representing the appellant had pointed out that apart from the said substantial question of law on the strength of which the second appeal was admitted the following substantial questions of law also would arise for consideration:(1) Whether the sale deed executed by Bapanamma relating to item No. 1 can be said to be valid and binding as she got only l...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›